| Literature DB >> 22461983 |
Antonio Cigliano1, Alessandro Gandaglia, Antonio Junior Lepedda, Elisabetta Zinellu, Filippo Naso, Alessandra Gastaldello, Paola Aguiari, Pierina De Muro, Gino Gerosa, Michele Spina, Marilena Formato.
Abstract
Cardiac valves are dynamic structures, exhibiting a highly specialized architecture consisting of cells and extracellular matrix with a relevant proteoglycan and glycosaminoglycan content, collagen and elastic fibers. Biological valve substitutes are obtained from xenogenic cardiac and pericardial tissues. To overcome the limits of such non viable substitutes, tissue engineering approaches emerged to create cell repopulated decellularized scaffolds. This study was performed to determine the glycosaminoglycans content, distribution, and disaccharides composition in porcine aortic and pulmonary valves and in pericardium before and after a detergent-based decellularization procedure. The fine structural characteristics of galactosaminoglycans chondroitin sulfate and dermatan sulfate were examined by FACE. Furthermore, the mechanical properties of decellularized pericardium and its propensity to be repopulated by in vitro seeded fibroblasts were investigated. Results show that galactosaminoglycans and hyaluronan are differently distributed between pericardium and valves and within heart valves themselves before and after decellularization. The distribution of glycosaminoglycans is also dependent from the vascular district and topographic localization. The decellularization protocol adopted resulted in a relevant but not selective depletion of galactosaminoglycans. As a whole, data suggest that both decellularized porcine heart valves and bovine pericardium represent promising materials bearing the potential for future development of tissue engineered heart valve scaffolds.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22461983 PMCID: PMC3296293 DOI: 10.1155/2012/979351
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biochem Res Int
Total GAG content (μg hexuronate/mg DDT) in the selected areas of cardiac valves and in pericardial tissue (before and after TriCol treatment).
| Aortic valve | Pulmonary valve | Pericardium | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaflet | Sinus | Wall | Leaflet | Sinus | Wall | ||
| NT | 17.50 ± 5.55 | 18.21 ± 11.57 | 5.74 ± 3.72 | 9.11 ± 5.02 | 5.66 ± 0.94 | 4.18 ± 1.09 | 2.34* |
| TriCol | 4.88 ± 3.43 | 5.61 ± 2.16 | 2.74 ± 0.60 | 4.61 ± 1.23 | 2.62 ± 0.95 | 2.82 ± 0.87 | 1.44* |
*pooled samples.
Figure 1Representative FACE separation of unsaturated AMAC-labeled disaccharides obtained from low- (0.55 M NaCl) and high-charged (1 M NaCl) GAGs after depolymerization with Chase ABC and AC.
Figure 2Relative Δ-disaccharides content in fresh (NT) and decellularized (TriCol) porcine heart valves and pericardium, as calculated from FACE data.
Figure 3Distribution of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) in NT and TriCol-treated porcine valves and pericardium, as calculated from FACE data. G0S: nonsulfated GlcA-containing disaccharides, G6S: 6-sulfated GlcA-containing disaccharide, G4S: 4-sulfated GlcA-containing disaccharide, G(4,6)S: disulfated GlcA-containing disaccharide, I0S: nonsulfated IdoA-containing disaccharide, I6S: 6-sulfated IdoA-containing disaccharide, I4S: 4-sulfated IdoA-containing disaccharide, I(4,6)S: disulfated IdoA-containing disaccharide.
Percentages of nonsulfated disaccharides from CS isomers in the examined tissues (means ± SD). Significant differences (P < 0.05) are reported in bold.
| ΔDi-nonsulfated/total Δ-disaccharides | |||
| NT | TriCol | ||
|
| |||
| Pericardium | 0.019 | 0.017 | |
|
| |||
| Aortic valve | |||
| NT | TriCol |
| |
|
| |||
| Leaflet | 0.177 ± 0.031 | 0.150 ± 0.024 | 0.228 |
| Sinus | 0.237 ± 0.031 | 0.158 ± 0.056 | 0.061 |
| Artery wall | 0.028 ± 0.016 | 0.048 ± 0.040 | 0.404 |
|
| |||
| Pulmonary valve | |||
| NT | TriCol |
| |
|
| |||
| Leaflet | 0.100 ± 0.017 | 0.090 ± 0.020 | 0.463 |
| Sinus | 0.129 ± 0.021 | 0.086 ± 0.029 | 0.070 |
| Artery wall | 0.029 ± 0.019 | 0.018 ± 0.004 | 0.380 |
|
| |||
| Aortic versus pulmonary | |||
| NT | TriCol | ||
|
| |||
| Leaflet |
|
| |
| Sinus |
| 0.117 | |
| Artery wall | 0.938 | 0.274 | |
Levels of epimerization and sulfation of CS isomers (means ± SD).
| CS/DS | CS | DS | Total GalAGs (CS + DS) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aortic valve | GlcA/IdoA | 4S/6S | 4S/6S | 4S/6S |
| Leaflet | 1.666 ± 0.645 | 0.375 ± 0.072 | 2.340 ± 0.699 | 0.823 ± 0.121 |
| Sinus | 2.611 ± 0.908 | 0.397 ± 0.072 | 2.359 ± 1.175 | 0.724 ± 0.077 |
| Artery wall | 1.446 ± 0.843 | 0.644 ± 0.111 | 2.221 ± 0.910 | 0.971 ± 0.074 |
|
| ||||
| Pulmonary valve | ||||
|
| ||||
| Leaflet | 1.180 ± 0.404 | 0.412 ± 0.087 | 2.605 ± 0.759 | 1.304 ± 0.525 |
| Sinus | 1.476 ± 0.673 | 0.589 ± 0.429 | 3.995 ± 0.665 | 1.273 ± 0.190 |
| Artery wall | 3.133 ± 0.777 | 0.681 ± 0.103 | 1.982 ± 0.760 | 0.905 ± 0.074 |
|
| ||||
| Pericardium* | 0.017 | * | * | 80.289 |
*Single data regarding C4S/C6S and D4S/D6S for pericardium were very high, as 6-sulfation was near to 0.
Figure 4H and E staining of native bovine pericardium (a); TriCol-decellularized bovine pericardium before (b) and after 7 days of bovine fibroblasts seeding (c). Magnification 20x.
Figure 5Stress-strain diagram of native and TriCol-decellularized bovine pericardium strips. See Section 2.