Literature DB >> 16820629

Metabolic syndrome is associated with faster degeneration of bioprosthetic valves.

Martin Briand1, Philippe Pibarot, Jean-Pierre Després, Pierre Voisine, Jean G Dumesnil, François Dagenais, Patrick Mathieu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported similarities between calcification of the native aortic valve and atherosclerosis. Recent studies also suggested that hypercholesterolemia may be a risk factor for calcific degeneration of bioprosthetic valves. The metabolic syndrome (MS) is associated with a higher risk of vascular atherosclerosis. We thus hypothesized that the atherogenic features of MS could accelerate bioprosthetic valve degeneration. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We included 217 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic valve in the study. Of these patients, 71 patients (33%) had MS defined according to the modified criteria proposed by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III. The annualized increase in mean transprosthetic gradient and the worsening of transprosthetic regurgitation measured by Doppler echocardiography were used to assess the deterioration of valve hemodynamic function. Patients with MS had higher progression of gradient (+4+/-5 mm Hg/year versus +2+/-2 mm Hg/year, P<0.001), higher proportion of > or = 1/3 degree worsening of regurgitation (25% versus 12%, P=0.02), and higher proportion of valve function deterioration defined as regurgitation worsening and/or > or = 3 mm Hg/year increase in gradient (41% versus 25%, P=0.02) when compared with patients without MS. On multivariate analysis, MS was an independent predictor of gradient progression (P=0.01), regurgitation worsening (P=0.02), and valve function deterioration (P=0.02). The other independent predictors were diabetes, renal insufficiency, and higher mean gradient at baseline.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to report that the MS is independently associated with faster bioprosthetic valve degeneration. This study could pave the way for the development of a new medical therapy able to significantly reduce the structural valve deterioration of bioprostheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16820629     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.000422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  21 in total

1.  The Quebec Heart Institute: 50 years of excellence in cardiology.

Authors:  Gilles R Dagenais; François Philippon; Jean-Pierre Després; Jean G Dumesnil; Paul Cartier; Peter M Bogaty; Michel Lemieux; André Moisan
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.223

2.  The effect of physiological stretch and the valvular endothelium on mitral valve proteomes.

Authors:  Mir S Ali; Xinmei Wang; Carla Mr Lacerda
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2019-02-05

Review 3.  Adipose tissue: friend or foe?

Authors:  Mohamed Hassan; Najma Latif; Magdi Yacoub
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Inflammation is associated with the remodeling of calcific aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Nancy Coté; Ablajan Mahmut; Yohan Bosse; Christian Couture; Sylvain Pagé; Sylvain Trahan; Marie-Chloé Boulanger; Dominique Fournier; Philippe Pibarot; Patrick Mathieu
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.092

Review 5.  Targeting abdominal obesity in cardiology: can we be effective?

Authors:  Paul Poirier
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 6.  Abdominal obesity and the metabolic syndrome: a surgeon's perspective.

Authors:  Patrick Mathieu
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.223

7.  Metabolic syndrome and outcome after breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Areerat Ounhasuttiyanon; Visnu Lohsiriwat
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2014-02

Review 8.  The 'valvulo-metabolic' risk in calcific aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Patrick Mathieu; J P Després; P Pibarot
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.223

9.  Porcine versus bovine bioprosthetic valves in mitral position: does choice really matter?

Authors:  Karthik Raman; Anbarasu Mohanraj; Vijayanand Palanisamy; Bharat Kumar Mohandoss; Sivakumar Pandian; Anjith Prakash Rajakumar; Jacob Jamesraj; Ejaz Ahmed Sheriff; Valikapathalil Mathew Kurian; Rajan Sethuratnam; Ravi Agarwal
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-07-23

10.  Degenerative valve disease and bioprostheses: risk assessment, predictive diagnosis, personalised treatments.

Authors:  Kristina Yeghiazaryan; Dirk Skowasch; Gerhard Bauriedel; Hans H Schild; Olga Golubnitschaja
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 6.543

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.