OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to describe coping strategies and their associations with psychological distress in young adult survivors of childhood cancer. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-four childhood cancer survivors, at least 7 years after diagnosis, completed questionnaires assessing demographics, health information, psychological distress, and different ways of coping (return rate: 61%). The Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18) and the Post-traumatic Diagnostic Scale's (PDS) eight-item short form were used to measure psychological distress. Coping was assessed with the Cognitive Control Strategies Scale (CCSS), the Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised (IPQ-R), and the White Bear Suppression Inventory (WBSI). RESULTS: Higher levels of distress were associated with the female sex, not being in a relationship, and with the presence of medical late effects. These predictors explained 12% of the variance in psychological distress. When coping variables were also entered into the equation, the amount of explained variance increased to 50%. The most important determinants of psychological distress in our sample were a tendency to suppress negative thoughts and a low level of optimism. CONCLUSION: These results contribute to a better understanding of the correlates of difficulties in long-term psychological adjustment after childhood cancer. Cognitive strategies, which are associated with or may increase the risk for concurrent psychological distress, in specific, avoidance of negative thoughts and a lack of positive future expectations, should be addressed in psychological counseling with survivors suffering from symptoms of distress.
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to describe coping strategies and their associations with psychological distress in young adult survivors of childhood cancer. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-four childhood cancer survivors, at least 7 years after diagnosis, completed questionnaires assessing demographics, health information, psychological distress, and different ways of coping (return rate: 61%). The Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18) and the Post-traumatic Diagnostic Scale's (PDS) eight-item short form were used to measure psychological distress. Coping was assessed with the Cognitive Control Strategies Scale (CCSS), the Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised (IPQ-R), and the White Bear Suppression Inventory (WBSI). RESULTS: Higher levels of distress were associated with the female sex, not being in a relationship, and with the presence of medical late effects. These predictors explained 12% of the variance in psychological distress. When coping variables were also entered into the equation, the amount of explained variance increased to 50%. The most important determinants of psychological distress in our sample were a tendency to suppress negative thoughts and a low level of optimism. CONCLUSION: These results contribute to a better understanding of the correlates of difficulties in long-term psychological adjustment after childhood cancer. Cognitive strategies, which are associated with or may increase the risk for concurrent psychological distress, in specific, avoidance of negative thoughts and a lack of positive future expectations, should be addressed in psychological counseling with survivors suffering from symptoms of distress.
Authors: Norma Mammone D'Agostino; Kim Edelstein; Nan Zhang; Christopher J Recklitis; Tara M Brinkman; Deokumar Srivastava; Wendy M Leisenring; Leslie L Robison; Gregory T Armstrong; Kevin R Krull Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-07-08 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: James L Klosky; Kevin R Krull; Toana Kawashima; Wendy Leisenring; Mary E Randolph; Brad Zebrack; Margaret L Stuber; Leslie L Robison; Sean Phipps Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2014-05-05 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Elisabeth M van Dijk-Lokkart; Katja I Braam; Gertjan J L Kaspers; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder; Tim Takken; Martha A Grootenhuis; Isabelle C Streng; Marc Bierings; Johannes H Merks; Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink; Margreet A Veening; Jaap Huisman Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-01-11 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Kristen J Stefanski; Julia S Anixt; Pamela Goodman; Katherine Bowers; Wendy Leisenring; K Scott Baker; Karen Burns; Rebecca Howell; Stella Davies; Leslie L Robison; Gregory T Armstrong; Kevin R Krull; Christopher Recklitis Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2021-04-06 Impact factor: 13.506