BACKGROUND: The potential for aerosol transmission of infectious influenza virus (ie, in healthcare facilities) is controversial. We constructed a simulated patient examination room that contained coughing and breathing manikins to determine whether coughed influenza was infectious and assessed the effectiveness of an N95 respirator and surgical mask in blocking transmission. METHODS: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health aerosol samplers collected size-fractionated aerosols for 60 minutes at the mouth of the breathing manikin, beside the mouth, and at 3 other locations in the room. Total recovered virus was quantitated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and infectivity was determined by the viral plaque assay and an enhanced infectivity assay. RESULTS: Infectious influenza was recovered in all aerosol fractions (5.0% in >4 μm aerodynamic diameter, 75.5% in 1-4 μm, and 19.5% in <1 μm; n = 5). Tightly sealing a mask to the face blocked entry of 94.5% of total virus and 94.8% of infectious virus (n = 3). A tightly sealed respirator blocked 99.8% of total virus and 99.6% of infectious virus (n = 3). A poorly fitted respirator blocked 64.5% of total virus and 66.5% of infectious virus (n = 3). A mask documented to be loosely fitting by a PortaCount fit tester, to simulate how masks are worn by healthcare workers, blocked entry of 68.5% of total virus and 56.6% of infectious virus (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: These results support a role for aerosol transmission and represent the first reported laboratory study of the efficacy of masks and respirators in blocking inhalation of influenza in aerosols. The results indicate that a poorly fitted respirator performs no better than a loosely fitting mask.
BACKGROUND: The potential for aerosol transmission of infectious influenza virus (ie, in healthcare facilities) is controversial. We constructed a simulated patient examination room that contained coughing and breathing manikins to determine whether coughed influenza was infectious and assessed the effectiveness of an N95 respirator and surgical mask in blocking transmission. METHODS: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health aerosol samplers collected size-fractionated aerosols for 60 minutes at the mouth of the breathing manikin, beside the mouth, and at 3 other locations in the room. Total recovered virus was quantitated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and infectivity was determined by the viral plaque assay and an enhanced infectivity assay. RESULTS: Infectious influenza was recovered in all aerosol fractions (5.0% in >4 μm aerodynamic diameter, 75.5% in 1-4 μm, and 19.5% in <1 μm; n = 5). Tightly sealing a mask to the face blocked entry of 94.5% of total virus and 94.8% of infectious virus (n = 3). A tightly sealed respirator blocked 99.8% of total virus and 99.6% of infectious virus (n = 3). A poorly fitted respirator blocked 64.5% of total virus and 66.5% of infectious virus (n = 3). A mask documented to be loosely fitting by a PortaCount fit tester, to simulate how masks are worn by healthcare workers, blocked entry of 68.5% of total virus and 56.6% of infectious virus (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: These results support a role for aerosol transmission and represent the first reported laboratory study of the efficacy of masks and respirators in blocking inhalation of influenza in aerosols. The results indicate that a poorly fitted respirator performs no better than a loosely fitting mask.
Authors: Francoise M Blachere; William G Lindsley; Terri A Pearce; Stacey E Anderson; Melanie Fisher; Rashida Khakoo; Barbara J Meade; Owen Lander; Stephen Davis; Robert E Thewlis; Ismail Celik; Bean T Chen; Donald H Beezhold Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2009-02-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Taronna R Maines; Li-Mei Chen; Yumiko Matsuoka; Hualan Chen; Thomas Rowe; Juan Ortin; Ana Falcón; Tran Hien Nguyen; Le Quynh Mai; Endang R Sedyaningsih; Syahrial Harun; Terrence M Tumpey; Ruben O Donis; Nancy J Cox; Kanta Subbarao; Jacqueline M Katz Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-07-31 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: William G Lindsley; Francoise M Blachere; Robert E Thewlis; Abhishek Vishnu; Kristina A Davis; Gang Cao; Jan E Palmer; Karen E Clark; Melanie A Fisher; Rashida Khakoo; Donald H Beezhold Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-11-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Vincent J Munster; Emmie de Wit; Judith M A van den Brand; Sander Herfst; Eefje J A Schrauwen; Theo M Bestebroer; David van de Vijver; Charles A Boucher; Marion Koopmans; Guus F Rimmelzwaan; Thijs Kuiken; Albert D M E Osterhaus; Ron A M Fouchier Journal: Science Date: 2009-07-02 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Donald K Milton; M Patricia Fabian; Benjamin J Cowling; Michael L Grantham; James J McDevitt Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2013-03-07 Impact factor: 6.823
Authors: Patricia Fabian; James J McDevitt; Wesley H DeHaan; Rita O P Fung; Benjamin J Cowling; Kwok Hung Chan; Gabriel M Leung; Donald K Milton Journal: PLoS One Date: 2008-07-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Francoise M Blachere; William G Lindsley; Cynthia M McMillen; Donald H Beezhold; Edward M Fisher; Ronald E Shaffer; John D Noti Journal: J Virol Methods Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 2.014
Authors: Jasmine Shimin Chung; Moi Lin Ling; Wing Hong Seto; Brenda Sze Peng Ang; Paul Anantharajah Tambyah Journal: Singapore Med J Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 1.858
Authors: Eric A Fried; George Zhou; Ronak Shah; Da Wi Shin; Anjan Shah; Daniel Katz; Garrett W Burnett Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2020-09-15 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Lewis J Radonovich; Michael S Simberkoff; Mary T Bessesen; Alexandria C Brown; Derek A T Cummings; Charlotte A Gaydos; Jenna G Los; Amanda E Krosche; Cynthia L Gibert; Geoffrey J Gorse; Ann-Christine Nyquist; Nicholas G Reich; Maria C Rodriguez-Barradas; Connie Savor Price; Trish M Perl Journal: JAMA Date: 2019-09-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: James J McDevitt; Petros Koutrakis; Stephen T Ferguson; Jack M Wolfson; M Patricia Fabian; Marco Martins; Jovan Pantelic; Donald K Milton Journal: Aerosol Sci Technol Date: 2013-01-25 Impact factor: 2.908
Authors: Jeffrey D Smith; Colin C MacDougall; Jennie Johnstone; Ray A Copes; Brian Schwartz; Gary E Garber Journal: CMAJ Date: 2016-03-07 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Edward M Fisher; John D Noti; William G Lindsley; Francoise M Blachere; Ronald E Shaffer Journal: Risk Anal Date: 2014-03-04 Impact factor: 4.000