BACKGROUND: Despite the high prevalence of clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) among older men, there remains a notable absence of studies focused on BPH prevention. OBJECTIVE: To determine if finasteride prevents incident clinical BPH in healthy older men. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data for this study are from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial. After excluding those with a history of BPH diagnosis or treatment, or an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥ 8 at study entry, 9253 men were available for analysis. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary outcome was incident clinical BPH, defined as the initiation of medical treatment, surgery, or sustained, clinically significant urinary symptoms (IPSS >14). Finasteride efficacy was estimated using Cox proportional regression models to generate hazards ratios (HRs). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Mean length of follow-up was 5.3 yr. The rate of clinical BPH was 19 per 1000 person-years in the placebo arm and 11 per 1000 person-years in the finasteride arm (p<0.001). In a covariate-adjusted model, finasteride reduced the risk of incident clinical BPH by 40% (HR: 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.69; p<0.001). The effect of finasteride on incident clinical BPH was attenuated in men with a body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m(2) (p(interaction) = 0.04) but otherwise did not differ significantly by physical activity, age, race, current diabetes, or current smoking. The post hoc nature of the analysis is a potential study limitation. CONCLUSIONS:Finasteride substantially reduces the risk of incident clinical BPH in healthy older men. These results should be considered in formulating recommendations for the use of finasteride to prevent prostate diseases in asymptomatic older men.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Despite the high prevalence of clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) among older men, there remains a notable absence of studies focused on BPH prevention. OBJECTIVE: To determine if finasteride prevents incident clinical BPH in healthy older men. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data for this study are from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial. After excluding those with a history of BPH diagnosis or treatment, or an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥ 8 at study entry, 9253 men were available for analysis. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary outcome was incident clinical BPH, defined as the initiation of medical treatment, surgery, or sustained, clinically significant urinary symptoms (IPSS >14). Finasteride efficacy was estimated using Cox proportional regression models to generate hazards ratios (HRs). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Mean length of follow-up was 5.3 yr. The rate of clinical BPH was 19 per 1000 person-years in the placebo arm and 11 per 1000 person-years in the finasteride arm (p<0.001). In a covariate-adjusted model, finasteride reduced the risk of incident clinical BPH by 40% (HR: 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.69; p<0.001). The effect of finasteride on incident clinical BPH was attenuated in men with a body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m(2) (p(interaction) = 0.04) but otherwise did not differ significantly by physical activity, age, race, current diabetes, or current smoking. The post hoc nature of the analysis is a potential study limitation. CONCLUSIONS:Finasteride substantially reduces the risk of incident clinical BPH in healthy older men. These results should be considered in formulating recommendations for the use of finasteride to prevent prostate diseases in asymptomatic older men.
Authors: Alan R Kristal; Chen Chi; Catherine M Tangen; Phyllis J Goodman; Ruth Etzioni; Ian M Thompson Journal: Cancer Date: 2006-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: J Kellogg Parsons; H Ballentine Carter; Alan W Partin; B Gwen Windham; E Jeffrey Metter; Luigi Ferrucci; Patricia Landis; Elizabeth A Platz Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2006-04-11 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: John D McConnell; Claus G Roehrborn; Oliver M Bautista; Gerald L Andriole; Christopher M Dixon; John W Kusek; Herbert Lepor; Kevin T McVary; Leroy M Nyberg; Harry S Clarke; E David Crawford; Ananias Diokno; John P Foley; Harris E Foster; Stephen C Jacobs; Steven A Kaplan; Karl J Kreder; Michael M Lieber; M Scott Lucia; Gary J Miller; Mani Menon; Douglas F Milam; Joe W Ramsdell; Noah S Schenkman; Kevin M Slawin; Joseph A Smith Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-12-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Gerald Andriole; Nicholas Bruchovsky; Leland W K Chung; Alvin M Matsumoto; Roger Rittmaster; Claus Roehrborn; David Russell; Donald Tindall Journal: J Urol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Ian M Thompson; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Gary J Miller; Leslie G Ford; Michael M Lieber; R Duane Cespedes; James N Atkins; Scott M Lippman; Susie M Carlin; Anne Ryan; Connie M Szczepanek; John J Crowley; Charles A Coltman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-06-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alan R Kristal; Kathryn B Arnold; Jeannette M Schenk; Marian L Neuhouser; Phyllis Goodman; David F Penson; Ian M Thompson Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2008-02-07 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Opal Lin-Tsai; Peter E Clark; Nicole L Miller; Jay H Fowke; Omar Hameed; Simon W Hayward; Douglas W Strand Journal: Prostate Date: 2014-02-05 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Carol M Moinpour; Amy K Darke; Gary W Donaldson; Duane Cespedes; Christine R Johnson; Patricia A Ganz; Donald L Patrick; John E Ware; Sally A Shumaker; Frank L Meyskens; Ian M Thompson Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2012-09-12 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Seth K Bechis; Alexander G Otsetov; Rongbin Ge; Zongwei Wang; Mark G Vangel; Chin-Lee Wu; Shahin Tabatabaei; Aria F Olumi Journal: J Urol Date: 2015-04-25 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Jeannette M Schenk; Rachel Hunter-Merrill; Yingye Zheng; Ruth Etzioni; Roman Gulati; Catherine Tangen; Ian M Thompson; Alan R Kristal Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2013-06-28 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Teresa T Liu; Melanie J Grubisha; Krystle A Frahm; Stacy G Wendell; Jiayan Liu; William A Ricke; Richard J Auchus; Donald B DeFranco Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2016-05-13 Impact factor: 5.157