Literature DB >> 22459178

Immediate procedural outcomes in 35 consecutive pipeline embolization cases: a single-center, single-user experience.

Geoffrey P Colby1, Li-Mei Lin, Juan F Gomez, Alexandra R Paul, Judy Huang, Rafael J Tamargo, Alexander L Coon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Flow diverters are an exciting new class of endovascular devices that treat aneurysms by curative reconstruction of the parent artery. The Pipeline embolization device (PED) is the first FDA-approved intracranial flow diverting device available in the USA. This paper presents periprocedural results with the device in a series of 35 consecutive cases.
METHODS: All patients who underwent PED treatment of an intracranial aneurysm at our institution following FDA approval of the device in April 2011 were included in the series. Patient demographics, aneurysm characteristics, procedural details and technical and clinical outcomes were analyzed.
RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (age range 23-78 years, mean 56.4 years) with 41 unruptured aneurysms (37 anterior circulation, four posterior circulation, mean size 11.4 mm, 20/21 large or giant) were treated with the PED in 35 cases (one patient had bilateral aneurysms treated on 2 separate occasions). Thirty-four of 35 cases (97%) were successfully completed. A total of 64 PEDs were implanted, with a mean number of 1.2 PEDs implanted per anterior circulation cases and 6.5 per posterior circulation cases. A single PED was implanted in 73% of cases. Immediate flow disruption occurred in 97% of the cases. The overall rate of major stroke or mortality was 3% (1/35 patients). Minor stroke, cranial nerve palsy, transient neurological deficit and groin complication occurred in one patient each (3% each, 12% total).
CONCLUSION: Treatment of cerebral aneurysms with the PED carries an acceptable risk profile when a rigorous and uniform technique is used. Although the long-term results will need to be analyzed, the immediate procedural outcomes in the study series using this technique appear quite promising.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22459178     DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  24 in total

1.  Revisiting the risk of intraparenchymal hemorrhage following aneurysm treatment by flow diversion.

Authors:  G P Colby; L-M Lin; A L Coon
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms using flow-diverter devices: A systematic review.

Authors:  Francesco Briganti; Giuseppe Leone; Mariano Marseglia; Giuseppe Mariniello; Ferdinando Caranci; Arturo Brunetti; Francesco Maiuri
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2015-08-27

3.  Utilization of a Novel, Multi-Durometer Intracranial Distal Access Catheter: Nuances and Experience in 110 Consecutive Cases of Aneurysm Flow Diversion.

Authors:  Geoffrey P Colby; Li-Mei Lin; Risheng Xu; Narlin Beaty; Matthew T Bender; Bowen Jiang; Judy Huang; Rafael J Tamargo; Alexander L Coon
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2017-02-03

4.  What's coming down the pipe--and should we be excited, concerned, or both?

Authors:  J L Brisman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Endovascular treatment of the distal internal carotid artery large aneurysm.

Authors:  Hong-Ju Bae; Do-Sung Yoo; Pil-Woo Huh; Tae-Gyu Lee; Kyoung-Suok Cho; Sang-Bok Lee
Journal:  J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg       Date:  2014-09-30

6.  Last-recorded P2Y12 reaction units value is strongly associated with thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications occurring up to 6 months after treatment in patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with the pipeline embolization device.

Authors:  J E Delgado Almandoz; B M Crandall; J M Scholz; J L Fease; R E Anderson; Y Kadkhodayan; D E Tubman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Delayed rupture of intracranial aneurysms after placement of intra-luminal flow diverter.

Authors:  Kun Hou; Guichen Li; Xianli Lv; Baofeng Xu; Kan Xu; Jinlu Yu
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2020-08-27

8.  Effect of structural remodeling (retraction and recoil) of the pipeline embolization device on aneurysm occlusion rate.

Authors:  L-D Jou; B D Mitchell; H M Shaltoni; M E Mawad
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Clinical and angiographic outcomes in patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with the pipeline embolization device: intra-procedural technical difficulties, major morbidity, and neurological mortality decrease significantly with increased operator experience in device deployment and patient management.

Authors:  Josser E Delgado Almandoz; Yasha Kayan; Andrea Tenreiro; Adam N Wallace; Jill M Scholz; Jennifer L Fease; Anna M Milner; Maximilian Mulder; Kyle M Uittenbogaard; Oscar Tenreiro-Picón
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 10.  Transvenous approach for the treatment of direct carotid cavernous fistula following Pipeline embolization of cavernous carotid aneurysm: a report of two cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  Li-Mei Lin; Geoffrey P Colby; Bowen Jiang; Guglielmo Pero; Edoardo Boccardi; Alexander L Coon
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-07-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.