Literature DB >> 22458868

Personality disorders in DSM-5.

Andrew E Skodol1.   

Abstract

A substantive revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) last occurred in 1994; therefore, the mental health field should anticipate significant changes to the classification of mental disorders in the fifth edition. Since DSM-5 Work Groups have recently proposed revisions for the major diagnostic classes of mental disorders, an article on the current status of the personality disorders (PDs) is timely. This article reviews scientific principles that have influenced the development of proposed changes for the assessment and diagnosis of personality psychopathology in DSM-5, presents the proposed model as of the summer of 2011, summarizes rationales for the changes, and discusses critiques of the model. Scientific principles were articulated for DSM-5 more than a decade ago; their application to the process has not been straightforward, however. Work Group members have labored to improve the DSM-5 approach to personality and PDs to make the classification more valid and more clinically useful. The current model continues to be a work in progress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22458868     DOI: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol        ISSN: 1548-5943            Impact factor:   18.561


  34 in total

1.  Associations between changes in normal personality traits and borderline personality disorder symptoms over 16 years.

Authors:  Aidan G C Wright; Christopher J Hopwood; Mary C Zanarini
Journal:  Personal Disord       Date:  2014-11-03

Review 2.  DSM-5 reviewed from different angles: goal attainment, rationality, use of evidence, consequences—part 2: bipolar disorders, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorders, trauma- and stressor-related disorders, personality disorders, substance-related and addictive disorders, neurocognitive disorders.

Authors:  Hans-Jürgen Möller; Borwin Bandelow; Michael Bauer; Harald Hampel; Sabine C Herpertz; Michael Soyka; Utako B Barnikol; Simone Lista; Emanuel Severus; Wolfgang Maier
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 3.  A Brief but Comprehensive Review of Research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders.

Authors:  Johannes Zimmermann; André Kerber; Katharina Rek; Christopher J Hopwood; Robert F Krueger
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Longitudinal validation of general and specific structural features of personality pathology.

Authors:  Aidan G C Wright; Christopher J Hopwood; Andrew E Skodol; Leslie C Morey
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2016-11

5.  Illuminating ipsative change in personality disorder and normal personality: A multimethod examination from a prospective longitudinal perspective.

Authors:  William C Woods; Elizabeth A Edershile; Aidan G C Wright; Mark F Lenzenweger
Journal:  Personal Disord       Date:  2018-07-16

Review 6.  Personality disorder classification: stuck in neutral, how to move forward?

Authors:  Andrew E Skodol
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 7.  Personality Assessment in the Diagnostic Manuals: On Mindfulness, Multiple Methods, and Test Score Discontinuities.

Authors:  Robert F Bornstein
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2015-04-09

8.  Impulsivity is associated with uric acid: evidence from humans and mice.

Authors:  Angelina R Sutin; Roy G Cutler; Simonetta Camandola; Manuela Uda; Neil H Feldman; Francesco Cucca; Alan B Zonderman; Mark P Mattson; Luigi Ferrucci; David Schlessinger; Antonio Terracciano
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 13.382

9.  Pathological narcissism and interpersonal behavior in daily life.

Authors:  Michael J Roche; Aaron L Pincus; David E Conroy; Amanda L Hyde; Nilam Ram
Journal:  Personal Disord       Date:  2012-12-03

10.  Incremental validity of the PID-5 in relation to the five factor model and traditional polythetic personality criteria of the DSM-5.

Authors:  J Christopher Fowler; Michelle A Patriquin; Alok Madan; Jon G Allen; B Christopher Frueh; John M Oldham
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 4.035

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.