| Literature DB >> 22458778 |
Dounia Saleh1, Joëlle Milazzo, Henri Adreit, Didier Tharreau, Elisabeth Fournier.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sexual reproduction is common in eukaryotic microorganisms, with few species reproducing exclusively asexually. However, in some organisms, such as fungi, asexual reproduction alternates with episodic sexual reproduction events. Fungi are thus appropriate organisms for studies of the reasons for the selection of sexuality or clonality and of the mechanisms underlying this selection. Magnaporthe oryzae, an Ascomycete causing blast disease on rice, reproduces mostly asexually in natura. Sexual reproduction is possible in vitro and requires (i) two strains of opposite mating types including (ii) at least one female-fertile strain (i.e. a strain able to produce perithecia, the female organs in which meiosis occurs). Female-fertile strains are found only in limited areas of Asia, in which evidence for contemporary recombination has recently been obtained. We induced the forced evolution of four Chinese female-fertile strains in vitro by the weekly transfer of asexual spores (conidia) between Petri dishes. We aimed to determine whether female fertility was rapidly lost in the absence of sexual reproduction and whether this loss was controlled genetically or epigenetically.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22458778 PMCID: PMC3379926 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-42
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Strains used for the experiment, mating type, experimental design and parameters of the Poisson regressions fitted to the data
| Last culture | Duration of the experiment | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1-A10 | 10/73 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 4.4 | 4.9 | 0.02 | -0.01 | - | - | -0.65 | 0.69 |
| S1-B20 | 20/146 | 0.82 | 0.53 | 4.8 | 5.1 | -0.28 | -0.15 | 2.5 | 4.5 | 0.56 | 0.64 |
| S2-A20 | 20/146 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 5.4 | 5.5 | -0.08 | -0.08 | 8.6 | 8.4 | 0.38 | 0.60 |
| S2-B20 | 20/146 | 0.85 | 0.94 | 5.4 | 5.6 | -0.21 | -0.24 | 3.3 | 2.9 | 0.82* | 0.98* |
| S3-A10 | 10/73 | 0.36 | 0.67 | 5.5 | 5.7 | -0.14 | -0.20 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 0.64 | 0.90* |
| S3-B20 | 20/146 | 0.67 | 0.87 | 5.6 | 5.8 | -0.19 | -0.30 | 3.7 | 2.3 | 0.65 | 0.82* |
| S4-A20 | 20/146 | 0.46 | 0.94 | 5.8 | 5.4 | -0.13 | -0.40 | 5.4 | 1.7 | 0.84* | 0.95* |
| S4-B20 | 20/146 | 0.60 | 0.99 | 5.7 | 5.6 | -0.22 | -0.46 | 3.2 | 1.5 | 0.89* | 0.85* |
Two replicates were performed for each strain (A and B). The name of experimental strains is given as Sx-RAG, where Sx is the name of the original wild-type strain, R is the replicate (A or B), and AG is the number of "asexual generations". The duration of the experiment is given in number of AGs and number of days. The "intercept" (a) and "slope" (b) of the Poisson regressions y = e(y: number of perithecia produced by the evolved strain, t = number of AGs) and tare given for each evolved strain with the two reference strains (1st and 2nd ref.). R: Coefficient of determination for each adjustment. ρ: Pearson's coefficient for the correlation between female fertility (= number of perithecia produced) and male fertility (= number of perithecia induced) for each strain against each reference strain in each replicate (* indicates values significantly different from 0, test for association between paired samples)
Figure 1. Design of the crosses and schematic diagram of results (A and B). A. Two lines of perithecia are produced between each tested strain and each reference strain: the tested strains are female-fertile and male-fertile. B. A single line of perithecia is produced between each tested strain and each reference strain: the tested strains are female-sterile and male-fertile. C and D: crosses of evolved strains derived from S3 at three different asexual generations (1, 2 and 10) with the two reference strains S1 and S2. C. Tests with S3-A1 and S3-A2: both strains are female-fertile. D. Tests with S3-A10 (same strain tested twice): the strain is female-sterile.
Stresses performed on female-sterile strains S1-B12 and S3-A10 and the corresponding wild-type strains S1 and S3
| -80°C | 5/5 | 5/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 |
| -80°C | 5/5 | 5/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 |
| Mycelium | 5/5 | 5/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 |
| single-spore | 1/1 | 1/1 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 12/12 | 12/12 | 0/12 | 0/10 |
| growth on plant | 1/1 | 1/1 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 7/10 | 10/10 | 0/8 | 0/10 |
The treatments were: one hour at -80°C, 24 hours at -80°C, mycelium mashing by ultrasound, single-spore isolation and growth on plants. The ratios (number of replicates in which the strain was female-fertile)/(number of replicates in which the strain was female-sterile) are given before and after the various treatments
Figure 2Estimation of the number of perithecia produced during crosses between the strains after several asexual generations (AGs). Perithecia were counted on 9 mm2 squares at three different positions along the confrontation line. Closed red symbols: number of perithecia produced by the evolved strain (female fertility). Open blue symbols: number of perithecia produced by the reference strain, i.e. induced by the evolved strains (male fertility). Triangles: first reference strain; Circles: second reference strain. The name of the reference strain used for the crosses is given in brackets. The curves are the Poisson regressions fitted to the data: y = e.
ANOVA of tfor loss of female fertility as a function of mating type, strain, replicate and reference strain used for crosses
| Source of variation | df | Sum of squares | Mean Square | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mating type | 1 | 12.4 | 12.4 | 12.5 | 0.017 * |
| Wild-type strain | 2 | 7.4 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 0.103 |
| Replicate | 3 | 31.1 | 10.4 | 10.4 | 0.014 * |
| Reference strain | 2 | 6.3 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 0.130 |
| Residuals | 5 | 5.0 | 1.0 |
df: degrees of freedom. * significant at the 5% level
Segregation of mating type and female fertility in the progenies of crosses between female-sterile evolved strains S1-B12 and S3-A10 and wild-type strains S3 and S1, and in backcross progenies
| S1 | S3 | Mat1-f | Mat2-f | 21 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 21:18 | 0.23 (0.631) | 39:00 | |||
| 126 | S1 | S3-A10 | Mat1.1-f | Mat1.2-s | 3 | 15 | 21:13 | 1.88 (0.170) | 12:24 | 7.53 (0.006) | |||
| 130 | S3 | 126/0/04 | Mat1.2-f | Mat1.1-s | 7 | 15 | 18:17 | 0.03 (0.866) | 09:26 | 8.26 (0.004) | |||
| 133 | S1 | 126/0/35 | Mat1.1-f | Mat1.2-s | 4 | 8 | 17:19 | 0.11 (0.739) | 13:23 | ||||
| 127 | S3 | S1-B12 | Mat1.2-f | Mat1.1-s | 5 | 15 | 20:17 | 0.24 (0.622) | 07:30 | 14.3 (0.000) | |||
| 131 | S1 | 127/0/25 | Mat1.1-f | Mat1.2-s | 18 | 6 | 19:24 | 0.58 (0.446) | 31:12 | 8.40 (0.004) | 50.9 (0.000) | ||
| 132 | S3 | 127/0/28 | Mat1.2-f | Mat1.1-s | 4 | 11 | 22:17 | 0.64 (0.423) | 10:29 | 9.26 (0.002) | |||
f: female-fertile, s: female-sterile (mutant). The control cross is the cross between the two wild-type strains S1 and S3 (first line). Values in bold indicate non significant differences at the 5% level
Figure 3Boxplots of number of conidia per cm. Conidial production was assessed in vitro (A) and on rice plants (B).
Figure 4Number of germinated conidia after transfer from one Petri dish to another (estimated over circles of 3 mm in diameter). Two independent replicates were generated. For each replicate, three areas on the plate were counted. The error bar represents the standard deviation calculated from these three counts. Blue bars: female-fertile wild-type strains (S1, S2 and S4). Green bars: female-sterile evolved strains (S1-B20, S2-A20 and S4-B20). Orange bars: mixtures of female-fertile wild-type strains and female-sterile evolved strains (S1+S1-B20, S2+S2-A20 and S4+S4-B20).
Ratio of female-sterile and female-fertile strains transferred in a single asexual generation from mixtures of female-sterile and female-fertile strains
| No. of female-sterile strains recovered/20 strains | Mean % of female-sterile strains recovered | Comparison with expected 50% ratio | Expected % based on conidial transfer evaluation in single culture | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mixture | Rep1 | Rep2 | |||
| S1 + S1B20 | 10 | 12 | 55 | NS (Chi2 = 0.4, | 72.1 |
| S2 + S2A20 | 19 | 20 | 97.5 | S (Chi2 = 36.1, | 90.6 |
| S3 + S3B20 | 19 | 20 | 97.5 | S (Chi2 = 36.1, | nd |
| S4 + S4A20 | 13 | 15 | 70 | S (Chi2 = 6.4, | 57.5 |
The expected percentage based on conidial transfer evaluation in a single culture was calculated by averaging the observed number of conidia transferred for each of the two strains when grown individually