Literature DB >> 19282047

Signs of sex: what we know and how we know it.

Andrew M Schurko1, Maurine Neiman, John M Logsdon.   

Abstract

The predominance of sexual reproduction indicates that it must confer profound benefits, considering its significant costs relative to asexuality. However, definitively determining whether a lineage engages in sex is often complicated by the potential for cryptic sex, especially among unfamiliar organisms. Here we consider the strengths and weaknesses of various molecular- and organismal-based approaches for recognizing signs of sex and describe their applications and relevance to evolutionary biology. We review recent studies that use these methods; some analyses even dispute several 'ancient' asexual taxa, and suggest they are recently derived or might be covertly sexual. More broadly, a better understanding of which organisms have sex and how they do it will deepen our understanding of the distribution, maintenance and evolution of sexual reproduction.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19282047     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  53 in total

1.  Sex-biased dispersal creates spatial genetic structure in a parthenogenetic ant with a dependent-lineage reproductive system.

Authors:  A Kuhn; D Bauman; H Darras; S Aron
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Neutral and selection-driven decay of sexual traits in asexual stick insects.

Authors:  Tanja Schwander; Bernard J Crespi; Regine Gries; Gerhard Gries
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Asexual Daphnia genomes expose something old, new, borrowed, and blue.

Authors:  John M Logsdon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Rapid genome shrinkage in a self-fertile nematode reveals sperm competition proteins.

Authors:  Da Yin; Erich M Schwarz; Cristel G Thomas; Rebecca L Felde; Ian F Korf; Asher D Cutter; Caitlin M Schartner; Edward J Ralston; Barbara J Meyer; Eric S Haag
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Rare gene capture in predominantly androgenetic species.

Authors:  Shannon M Hedtke; Matthias Glaubrecht; David M Hillis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Sex is a ubiquitous, ancient, and inherent attribute of eukaryotic life.

Authors:  Dave Speijer; Julius Lukeš; Marek Eliáš
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Large genomic differences between the morphologically indistinguishable diplomonads Spironucleus barkhanus and Spironucleus salmonicida.

Authors:  Katarina Roxström-Lindquist; Jon Jerlström-Hultqvist; Anders Jørgensen; Karin Troell; Staffan G Svärd; Jan O Andersson
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Evolution of the sex-related locus and genomic features shared in microsporidia and fungi.

Authors:  Soo Chan Lee; Nicolas Corradi; Sylvia Doan; Fred S Dietrich; Patrick J Keeling; Joseph Heitman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Biological species is the only possible form of existence for higher organisms: the evolutionary meaning of sexual reproduction.

Authors:  Victor P Shcherbakov
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 4.540

10.  Inventory and phylogenetic analysis of meiotic genes in monogonont rotifers.

Authors:  Sara J Hanson; Andrew M Schurko; Bette Hecox-Lea; David B Mark Welch; Claus-Peter Stelzer; John M Logsdon
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.645

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.