Y-C Huang1, Y-C Li, T-J Chen. 1. Department of Dermatology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, 111 Xinglong Road Section 3, Wenshan District, Taipei City 116, Taiwan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Quantitative analysis of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) treatment against toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is lacking. OBJECTIVES: To provide a meta-analysis evidence-based examination of IVIg efficacy against TEN. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of literature published before 31 July 2011 was conducted. In observational controlled studies with at least eight patients with TEN receiving IVIg treatment, a pooled estimate of mortality risk was determined, comparing IVIg and supportive care. Statistical analyses were performed on raw data to compare the clinical differences between (i) high-dose and low-dose IVIg treatment in adult patients and (ii) paediatric and adult patients treated with IVIg. RESULTS: Seventeen studies met inclusion criteria. Overall mortality rate of patients with TEN treated with IVIg was 19.9%. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for mortality from six observational controlled studies comparing IVIg and supportive care was 1.00 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58-1.75; P=0.99]. The pooled OR for mortality in patients treated with high-dose IVIg vs. supportive care was 0.63 (95% CI 0.27-1.44; P=0.27). Adults treated with high-dose IVIg exhibited significantly lower mortality than those treated with low-dose IVIg (18.9% vs. 50%, respectively; P=0.022); however, multivariate logistic regression model adjustment indicated that IVIg dose does not correlate with mortality (high vs. low dose: OR 0.494; 95% CI 0.106-2.300; P=0.369). Paediatric patients treated with IVIg had significantly lower mortality than adults (0% vs. 21.6%; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although high-dose IVIg exhibited a trend towards improved mortality and children treated with IVIg had a good prognosis, the evidence does not support a clinical benefit of IVIg. Randomized controlled trials are necessary.
BACKGROUND: Quantitative analysis of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) treatment against toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is lacking. OBJECTIVES: To provide a meta-analysis evidence-based examination of IVIg efficacy against TEN. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of literature published before 31 July 2011 was conducted. In observational controlled studies with at least eight patients with TEN receiving IVIg treatment, a pooled estimate of mortality risk was determined, comparing IVIg and supportive care. Statistical analyses were performed on raw data to compare the clinical differences between (i) high-dose and low-dose IVIg treatment in adult patients and (ii) paediatric and adult patients treated with IVIg. RESULTS: Seventeen studies met inclusion criteria. Overall mortality rate of patients with TEN treated with IVIg was 19.9%. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for mortality from six observational controlled studies comparing IVIg and supportive care was 1.00 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58-1.75; P=0.99]. The pooled OR for mortality in patients treated with high-dose IVIg vs. supportive care was 0.63 (95% CI 0.27-1.44; P=0.27). Adults treated with high-dose IVIg exhibited significantly lower mortality than those treated with low-dose IVIg (18.9% vs. 50%, respectively; P=0.022); however, multivariate logistic regression model adjustment indicated that IVIg dose does not correlate with mortality (high vs. low dose: OR 0.494; 95% CI 0.106-2.300; P=0.369). Paediatric patients treated with IVIg had significantly lower mortality than adults (0% vs. 21.6%; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although high-dose IVIg exhibited a trend towards improved mortality and children treated with IVIg had a good prognosis, the evidence does not support a clinical benefit of IVIg. Randomized controlled trials are necessary.
Authors: Olivia A Charlton; Victoria Harris; Kevin Phan; Erin Mewton; Chris Jackson; Alan Cooper Journal: Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) Date: 2020-01-09 Impact factor: 4.730