Literature DB >> 22456890

Tradeoffs limit the evolution of male traits that are attractive to females.

William E Wagner1, Oliver M Beckers, Amanda E Tolle, Alexandra L Basolo.   

Abstract

Tradeoffs occur between a variety of traits in a diversity of organisms, and these tradeoffs can have major effects on ecological and evolutionary processes. Far less is known, however, about tradeoffs between male traits that affect mate attraction than about tradeoffs between other types of traits. Previous results indicate that females of the variable field cricket, Gryllus lineaticeps, prefer male songs with higher chirp rates and longer chirp durations. In the current study, we tested the hypothesis that a tradeoff between these traits affects the evolution of male song. The two traits were negatively correlated among full-sibling families, consistent with a genetically based tradeoff, and the tradeoff was stronger when nutrients were limiting. In addition, for males from 12 populations reared in a common environment, the traits were negatively correlated within populations, the strength of the tradeoff was largely invariant across populations, and the within-population tradeoff predicted how the traits have evolved among populations. A widespread tradeoff thus affects male trait evolution. Finally, for males from four populations assayed in the field, the traits were negatively correlated within and among populations. The tradeoff is thus robust to the presence of environmental factors that might mask its effects. Together, our results indicate there is a fundamental tradeoff between male traits that: (i) limits the ability of males to produce multiple attractive traits; (ii) limits how male traits evolve; and (iii) might favour plasticity in female mating preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22456890      PMCID: PMC3367788          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.0275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  26 in total

1.  Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin's finches.

Authors:  J Podos
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-01-11       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Costs of sexual traits: a mismatch between theoretical considerations and empirical evidence.

Authors:  J S Kotiaho
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2001-08

3.  The evolution of trade-offs: geographic variation in call duration and flight ability in the sand cricket, Gryllus firmus.

Authors:  D A Roff; P Crnokrak; D J Fairbairn
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.411

4.  Sexual selection: when to expect trade-offs.

Authors:  Dave Shutler
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Evolutionary trade-off between weapons and testes.

Authors:  Leigh W Simmons; Douglas J Emlen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  The evolution of trade-offs: where are we?

Authors:  D A Roff; D J Fairbairn
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  The energetic basis of acoustic communication.

Authors:  James F Gillooly; Alexander G Ophir
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The physiology of life-history trade-offs: experimental analysis of a hormonally induced life-history trade-off in Gryllus assimilis.

Authors:  A J Zera; J Potts; K Kobus
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Directional female preference for an exaggerated male trait in canary (Serinus canaria) song.

Authors:  Tudor I Drăgănoiu; Laurent Nagle; Michel Kreutzer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Female life span and fertility are increased by the ejaculates of preferred males.

Authors:  William E Wagner; Christopher J Harper
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  A systems approach to animal communication.

Authors:  Eileen A Hebets; Andrew B Barron; Christopher N Balakrishnan; Mark E Hauber; Paul H Mason; Kim L Hoke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Eavesdropping parasitoids do not cause the evolution of less conspicuous signalling behaviour in a field cricket.

Authors:  Oliver M Beckers; William E Wagner
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  The Developmental and Genetic Architecture of the Sexually Selected Male Ornament of Swordtails.

Authors:  Manfred Schartl; Susanne Kneitz; Jenny Ormanns; Cornelia Schmidt; Jennifer L Anderson; Angel Amores; Julian Catchen; Catherine Wilson; Dietmar Geiger; Kang Du; Mateo Garcia-Olazábal; Sudha Sudaram; Christoph Winkler; Rainer Hedrich; Wesley C Warren; Ronald Walter; Axel Meyer; John H Postlethwait
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Expression of multiple sexual signals by fathers and sons in the East-Mediterranean barn swallow: are advertising strategies heritable?

Authors:  Yoni Vortman; Rebecca J Safran; Tali Reiner Brodetzki; Roi Dor; Arnon Lotem
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Mate choice decision rules: Trait synergisms and preference shifts.

Authors:  Nancy Tyler Burley; Elnaz Hamedani; Cole Symanski
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Constrained evolution of the sex comb in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  M S Maraqa; R Griffin; M D Sharma; A J Wilson; J Hunt; D J Hosken; C M House
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Pre and Post-copulatory Selection Favor Similar Genital Phenotypes in the Male Broad Horned Beetle.

Authors:  Clarissa M House; M D Sharma; Kensuke Okada; David J Hosken
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.326

8.  Evolution of correlated complexity in the radically different courtship signals of birds-of-paradise.

Authors:  Russell A Ligon; Christopher D Diaz; Janelle L Morano; Jolyon Troscianko; Martin Stevens; Annalyse Moskeland; Timothy G Laman; Edwin Scholes
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 8.029

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.