Literature DB >> 23888083

Eavesdropping parasitoids do not cause the evolution of less conspicuous signalling behaviour in a field cricket.

Oliver M Beckers1, William E Wagner.   

Abstract

Males of many species produce conspicuous mating signals to attract females, but these signals can also attract eavesdropping predators and parasites. Males are thus expected to evolve signalling behaviours that balance the sexual selection benefits and the natural selection costs. In the variable field cricket, Gryllus lineaticeps, males sing to attract females, but these songs also attract the lethal parasitoid fly Ormia ochracea. The flies use male crickets as hosts for their larvae, primarily search for hosts during a 2 h period following sunset and prefer the same song types as female crickets. We tested whether males from high-risk populations reduce the risk of parasitism by singing less frequently or by shifting their singing activity to a time of the night when the risk of parasitism is low. We compared male singing activity and its temporal pattern between six high-risk and six low-risk populations that were reared in a common environment. There was no effect of parasitism risk on either total male singing activity or the temporal pattern of male singing activity. Males from high-risk populations thus sang as frequently as males from low-risk populations. These results suggest that sexual selection on male singing behaviour may be substantially stronger in high-risk populations than in low-risk populations. It is possible that other traits may have evolved to reduce parasitism risk without compromising mate attraction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gryllus lineaticeps; Ormia ochracea; field cricket; natural selection; parasitoid fly; sexual selection; singing activity

Year:  2012        PMID: 23888083      PMCID: PMC3719872          DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  13 in total

1.  Crickets with extravagant mating songs compensate for predation risk with extra caution.

Authors:  A V Hedrick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Genetics, development and evolution of adaptive pigmentation in vertebrates.

Authors:  H E Hoekstra
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Silent night: adaptive disappearance of a sexual signal in a parasitized population of field crickets.

Authors:  Marlene Zuk; John T Rotenberry; Robin M Tinghitella
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Nocturnal aerial predation of fireflies by light-seeking fireflies.

Authors:  J E Lloyd; S R Wing
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-11-11       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Evidence for adaptive changes in egg laying in crickets exposed to bacteria and parasites.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Costly signals in a field cricket can indicate high- or low-quality direct benefits depending upon the environment.

Authors:  Amanda E Tolle; William E Wagner
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin's finches.

Authors:  Peter R Grant; B Rosemary Grant
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-04-26       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Female field crickets incur increased parasitism risk when near preferred song.

Authors:  Cassandra M Martin; William E Wagner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Female life span and fertility are increased by the ejaculates of preferred males.

Authors:  William E Wagner; Christopher J Harper
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  The relative importance of different direct benefits in the mate choices of a field cricket.

Authors:  William E Wagner; Alexandra L Basolo
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  4 in total

1.  Eavesdropping on cooperative communication within an ant-butterfly mutualism.

Authors:  Mark A Elgar; David R Nash; Naomi E Pierce
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2016-09-27

2.  Parasitoid infestation changes female mating preferences.

Authors:  Oliver M Beckers; William E Wagner
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  Sex-based differences in anti-predator response of crickets to chemical cues of a mammalian predator.

Authors:  Brian P Tanis; Bradley Bott; Brian J Gaston
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Background noise disrupts host-parasitoid interactions.

Authors:  Jennifer N Phillips; Sophia K Ruef; Christopher M Garvin; My-Lan T Le; Clinton D Francis
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.963

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.