Literature DB >> 2245670

Use of pulmonary artery catheters in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Analysis of experience in 5,841 patients in the SPRINT Registry. SPRINT Study Group.

M M Zion1, J Balkin, D Rosenmann, U Goldbourt, H Reicher-Reiss, E Kaplinsky, S Behar.   

Abstract

This study analyzes the use of PAC in a registry comprising 5,841 hospitalized patients with AMI. A total of 371 patients received PAC. In-hospital mortality was higher in patients with CHF who received PAC, while there was no difference in patients with cardiogenic shock or persistent hypotension. Mortality in patients receiving PAC was higher irrespective of the presence or absence of "pump failure." A separate analysis of discharge summaries of 364 patients with CHF showed that PAC was used more frequently in sicker patients and that when severity of CHF was assessed, no difference in mortality was found in patients with mild or moderate CHF. We conclude that while a higher in-hospital mortality is found in patients receiving PAC, this excess is likely related to difference in severity of CHF, which had not been assessed in every individual. It is unlikely that PAC increases mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2245670     DOI: 10.1378/chest.98.6.1331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  19 in total

1.  Methods of monitoring shock.

Authors:  Ednan K Bajwa; Atul Malhotra; B Taylor Thompson
Journal:  Semin Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.119

Review 2.  Perioperative Haemodynamic Optimisation.

Authors:  Hollmann D Aya; Maurizio Cecconi; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2014-04-01

Review 3.  Minimally invasive or noninvasive cardiac output measurement: an update.

Authors:  Lisa Sangkum; Geoffrey L Liu; Ling Yu; Hong Yan; Alan D Kaye; Henry Liu
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Evaluation of the use of the fourth version FloTrac system in cardiac output measurement before and after cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Sheng-Yi Lin; An-Hsun Chou; Yung-Fong Tsai; Su-Wei Chang; Min-Wen Yang; Pei-Chi Ting; Chun-Yu Chen
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 5.  Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of infarction-related cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  M Buerke; H Lemm; S Dietz; K Werdan
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 6.  New approaches to therapy of cancers of the stomach, colon and pancreas based on peptide analogs.

Authors:  A V Schally; K Szepeshazi; A Nagy; A M Comaru-Schally; G Halmos
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  Demographics, treatment and outcome of acute coronary syndromes: 17 years of experience in a specialized cardiac centre.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre S Awaida; Jocelyn Dupuis; Pierre Théroux; Guy Pelletier; Michel Joyal; Pierre De Guise; Serge Doucet; Luc Bilodeau; Bernard Thibault; Jean-Francois Tanguay; Richard Gallo; Jean Grégoire; Philippe L L'Allier; Laurent Macle; Anil Nigam
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 8.  Haemodynamic monitoring in acute heart failure.

Authors:  Maurizio Cecconi; Toby E Reynolds; Nawaf Al-Subaie; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 9.  The evolving concepts of haemodynamic support: from pulmonary artery catheter to echocardiography and theragnostics.

Authors:  Antonio Figueiredo; Nuno Germano; Pedro Guedes; Paulo Marcelino
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2011-08

10.  Searching for an ideal hemodynamic marker to predict short-term outcome in cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Mehmet Birhan Yilmaz; Alexandre Mebazaa
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.