Literature DB >> 22454385

Cryptorchidism and hypospadias in a cohort of 934,538 Danish boys: the role of birth weight, gestational age, body dimensions, and fetal growth.

Morten Søndergaard Jensen1, Allen J Wilcox, Jørn Olsen, Jens Peter Bonde, Ane Marie Thulstrup, Cecilia Høst Ramlau-Hansen, Tine Brink Henriksen.   

Abstract

Early delivery and low birth weight are strong predictors of the urogenital anomalies cryptorchidism (undescended testis) and hypospadias. Understanding these associations may lead to important etiologic clues. Therefore, the authors revisited the prevailing hypotheses regarding fetal growth restriction as a risk factor for urogenital anomalies. They studied a population of 934,538 Danish boys born alive between January 1, 1980, and December 31, 2008. Cryptorchidism and hypospadias were associated with low weight-for-gestational-age, an indicator of fetal growth restriction, and furthermore the authors observed strong interaction with early delivery. Low birth weight in a singleton compared with the mean birth weight of all singleton brothers in the family or in a twin compared with the male co-twin was associated with higher risk of urogenital anomalies, suggesting an effect of relative fetal growth restriction within families. Contrary to previous reports, newborns' body dimensions assessed independently of birth weight were not associated with urogenital anomalies. The hypothesis that shared factors cause both fetal growth restriction and urogenital anomalies was supported by comparison of urogenital anomaly risks in singletons and twins and by patterns of cryptorchidism and hypospadias co-occurrence in individuals. These novel insights might also extend to other male reproductive conditions with prenatal etiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22454385     DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwr421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  19 in total

1.  Placental pathology and hypospadias.

Authors:  Yan Chen; Luming Sun; Hongquan Geng; Xiaoping Lei; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.756

2.  Single penile incision for combined hypospadias and inguinal surgery: A comparative study.

Authors:  Michael E Chua; Naif Alqarni; Jessica M Ming; Fahad Alyami; Joana Dos Santos; Roberto Iglesias Lopes; Walid A Farhat; Martin A Koyle
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  DSDs: genetics, underlying pathologies and psychosexual differentiation.

Authors:  Valerie A Arboleda; David E Sandberg; Eric Vilain
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 4.  Risk factors for cryptorchidism.

Authors:  Jason K Gurney; Katherine A McGlynn; James Stanley; Tony Merriman; Virginia Signal; Caroline Shaw; Richard Edwards; Lorenzo Richiardi; John Hutson; Diana Sarfati
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Clinical aspects of histological and hormonal parameters in boys with cryptorchidism: Thesis for PhD degree.

Authors:  Simone Engmann Hildorf
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 3.428

6.  Placental Weight and Male Genital Anomalies: A Nationwide Danish Cohort Study.

Authors:  Linn Håkonsen Arendt; Cecilia Høst Ramlau-Hansen; Allen J Wilcox; Tine Brink Henriksen; Jørn Olsen; Morten Søndergaard Lindhard
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Altered infant feeding patterns in boys with acquired nonsyndromic cryptorchidism.

Authors:  Julia Spencer Barthold; Jobayer Hossain; Alicia Olivant-Fisher; Anita Reilly; T Ernesto Figueroa; Ahmad Banihani; Jennifer Hagerty; Ricardo González; Paul H Noh; Jeanne M Manson
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2012-10-18

8.  The exposome--exciting opportunities for discoveries in reproductive and perinatal epidemiology.

Authors:  Germaine M Buck Louis; Edwina Yeung; Rajeshwari Sundaram; S Katherine Laughon; Cuilin Zhang
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 3.980

Review 9.  Anogenital distance as a marker of androgen exposure in humans.

Authors:  A Thankamony; V Pasterski; K K Ong; C L Acerini; I A Hughes
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.842

Review 10.  Epidemiologic methods for investigating male fecundity.

Authors:  Jørn Olsen; Cecilia Høst Ramlau-Hansen
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.