BACKGROUND: Genetic and environmental factors likely influence susceptibility to nonsyndromic cryptorchidism, a common disease presenting at birth or in later childhood. We compared cases and controls to define differential risk factors for congenital versus acquired cryptorchidism. METHODS: We compared questionnaire and clinical data from cases of congenital cryptorchidism (n = 230), acquired cryptorchidism (n = 182) and hernia/hydrocele (n = 104) with a group of healthy male controls (n = 358). Potential predictor variables (p < 0.2 in univariable analysis) were included in stepwise multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: Temporary (odds ratio [OR], 0.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4-0.8) or exclusive (OR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-0.9) breastfeeding was reduced and soy formula feeding increased (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.9) in acquired but not congenital or hernia/hydrocele groups. The highest risk estimates were observed for primary soy formula feeding with limited or no breastfeeding (OR 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4-4.3; adjusted OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.4-5.4) in the acquired group. Primary feeding risk estimates were equivalent or strengthened when multivariable models were limited to age greater than 2 years, full-term or not small for gestational age, or Caucasian subjects. Pregnancy complications and increased maternal exposure to cosmetic or household chemicals were not consistently associated with either form of cryptorchidism in these models. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support reduced breastfeeding and soy formula feeding as potential risk factors for acquired cryptorchidism. Although additional studies are needed, hormonally active components of breast milk and soy formula could influence the establishment of normal testis position in the first months of life, leading to apparent ascent of testes in childhood. Birth Defects Research (Part A), 2012.
BACKGROUND: Genetic and environmental factors likely influence susceptibility to nonsyndromic cryptorchidism, a common disease presenting at birth or in later childhood. We compared cases and controls to define differential risk factors for congenital versus acquired cryptorchidism. METHODS: We compared questionnaire and clinical data from cases of congenital cryptorchidism (n = 230), acquired cryptorchidism (n = 182) and hernia/hydrocele (n = 104) with a group of healthy male controls (n = 358). Potential predictor variables (p < 0.2 in univariable analysis) were included in stepwise multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: Temporary (odds ratio [OR], 0.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4-0.8) or exclusive (OR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-0.9) breastfeeding was reduced and soy formula feeding increased (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.9) in acquired but not congenital or hernia/hydrocele groups. The highest risk estimates were observed for primary soy formula feeding with limited or no breastfeeding (OR 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4-4.3; adjusted OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.4-5.4) in the acquired group. Primary feeding risk estimates were equivalent or strengthened when multivariable models were limited to age greater than 2 years, full-term or not small for gestational age, or Caucasian subjects. Pregnancy complications and increased maternal exposure to cosmetic or household chemicals were not consistently associated with either form of cryptorchidism in these models. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support reduced breastfeeding and soy formula feeding as potential risk factors for acquired cryptorchidism. Although additional studies are needed, hormonally active components of breast milk and soy formula could influence the establishment of normal testis position in the first months of life, leading to apparent ascent of testes in childhood. Birth Defects Research (Part A), 2012.
Authors: Claudia A Snijder; Andreas Kortenkamp; Eric A P Steegers; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Albert Hofman; Ulla Hass; Alex Burdorf Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2012-02-02 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Michael E O'Callaghan; Alastair H MacLennan; Catherine S Gibson; Gai L McMichael; Eric A Haan; Jessica L Broadbent; Paul N Goldwater; Gustaaf A Dekker Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Trent D Lund; Daniel J Munson; Megan E Haldy; Kenneth D R Setchell; Edwin D Lephart; Robert J Handa Journal: Biol Reprod Date: 2003-12-17 Impact factor: 4.285
Authors: Morgana L Mongraw-Chaffin; Barbara A Cohn; Richard D Cohen; Roberta E Christianson Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2007-11-17 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Julia S Barthold; Yanping Wang; Thomas F Kolon; Claude Kollin; Agneta Nordenskjöld; Alicia Olivant Fisher; T Ernesto Figueroa; Ahmad H BaniHani; Jennifer A Hagerty; Ricardo Gonzalez; Paul H Noh; Rosetta M Chiavacci; Kisha R Harden; Debra J Abrams; Cecilia E Kim; Abigail B Mateson; Alan K Robbins; Jin Li; Robert E Akins; Hakon Hakonarson; Marcella Devoto Journal: J Urol Date: 2014-10-25 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Jason K Gurney; Katherine A McGlynn; James Stanley; Tony Merriman; Virginia Signal; Caroline Shaw; Richard Edwards; Lorenzo Richiardi; John Hutson; Diana Sarfati Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2017-06-27 Impact factor: 14.432
Authors: Julia Spencer Barthold; Yanping Wang; Thomas F Kolon; Claude Kollin; Agneta Nordenskjöld; Alicia Olivant Fisher; T Ernesto Figueroa; Ahmad H BaniHani; Jennifer A Hagerty; Ricardo Gonzaléz; Paul H Noh; Rosetta M Chiavacci; Kisha R Harden; Debra J Abrams; Cecilia E Kim; Jin Li; Hakon Hakonarson; Marcella Devoto Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2015-07-24 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Julia Spencer Barthold; Anton Wintner; Jennifer A Hagerty; Kenneth J Rogers; Md Jobayer Hossain Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 5.555