Literature DB >> 22453110

Patient characteristics associated with a successful pessary fitting.

Danielle Markle1, Laura Skoczylas, Crystal Goldsmith, Karen Noblett.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: : The objective of the study was to assess if patient characteristics, including Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification measurements, are predictive of successful pessary fitting in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and/or incontinence.
METHODS: : This was a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent a pessary fitting for POP and/or incontinence. Multiple demographic parameters, pessary fitting data, and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification measurements were examined.
RESULTS: : Complete data were available on 158 patients, and 59% were successfully fit. Shorter total vaginal length (TVL), less than 8 cm, was associated with an unsuccessful pessary fitting (odds ratio [OR], 0.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.46). A genital hiatus (GH)/TVL ratio of less than 0.9 was predictive of successful fitting (OR, 12.5; 95% CI, 1.5-102). Patients with a prior hysterectomy were more likely to have an unsuccessful pessary fitting (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22-0.8). The GH/TVL ratio and TVL were predictors only in patients with a previous hysterectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: : Patients with a previous hysterectomy and a TVL of less than 8 cm or a GH/TVL ratio of 0.9 or greater can be counseled that successful pessary fitting is unlikely.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22453110     DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e31822f00ae

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 2151-8378            Impact factor:   2.091


  10 in total

1.  Natural history of pessary use in women aged 65 - 74 versus 75 years and older with pelvic organ prolapse: a 12-year study.

Authors:  Sophie Ramsay; Le Mai Tu; Cara Tannenbaum
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Successful use of ring pessary with support for advanced pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Jing Ding; Chun Chen; Xiao-Chen Song; Lei Zhang; Mou Deng; Lan Zhu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Is it safe and effective to maintain the vaginal pessary without removing it for 2 consecutive years?

Authors:  Alessio Miceli; Manuel Fernández-Sánchez; Juan Polo-Padillo; José-Luis Dueñas-Díez
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Total vaginal length: Does it matter for assessing uterine prolapse?

Authors:  Myriam Girgis; Ka Lai Shek; Hans Peter Dietz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Defecatory dysfunction and other clinical variables are predictors of pessary discontinuation.

Authors:  Erin G Dengler; Louisa A Mounsey; Francesca Gines; Manahil Agha; Terri Long; Elizabeth J Geller
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Vaginal Pessaries for Pelvic Organ Prolapse or Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2021-05-06

7.  Ring and Gellhorn pessaries used in patients with pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective study of 8 years.

Authors:  Junfang Yang; Jinsong Han; Fuli Zhu; Yu Wang
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 2.344

8.  Factors associated with unsuccessful pessary fitting and reasons for discontinuation in Korean women with pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Sumin Oh; Hye Ryun Namkung; Hee Yeon Yoon; So Yeon Lee; Myung Jae Jeon
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2021-12-13

Review 9.  Parameters associated with unsuccessful pessary fitting for pelvic organ prolapse up to three months follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claudia Manzini; Lisan M Morsinkhof; C Huub van der Vaart; Mariëlla I J Withagen; Anique T M Grob
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 1.932

10.  Predictors of unsuccessful pessary fitting in women with prolapse: a cross-sectional study in general practice.

Authors:  Chantal M C R Panman; Marian Wiegersma; Boudewijn J Kollen; Huibert Burger; Marjolein Y Berger; Janny H Dekker
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 2.894

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.