Literature DB >> 30357469

Total vaginal length: Does it matter for assessing uterine prolapse?

Myriam Girgis1, Ka Lai Shek2,3, Hans Peter Dietz3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Using the International Continence Society Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (ICS POP-Q) system, uterine prolapse staging requires measurement of total vaginal length (TVL). The aim of this study was to determine whether TVT is a confounder of the relationship between uterine descent and POP symptoms.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study on 721 patients seen in a tertiary urogynaecological unit. All patients had undergone a standardised, in-house, physician-led questionnaire and digital POP-Q examination. Patients with a history of hysterectomy or with a dominant prolapse in the anterior ± posterior compartment were excluded from analysis, leaving 393 complete data sets for analysis. Association between prolapse symptoms (lump/drag) and station of cervix (i.e. C) were tested. Age, body mass index (BMI), menospausal status and vaginal parity were tested as potential confounders. Variables that were significant on binary logistic regression (P < 0.05) were included in a model for receiver operting characteristic (ROC) statistical analysis. This was repeated after adding TVL to the model. Likelihood ratio test was performed to compare models.
RESULTS: On binary logistic regression, prolapse symptoms were significantly associated with C, menopausal status and TVL (all P < 0.03). ROC analysis yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.75 with menopausal status and C in the model. Adding TVL yielded an AUC of 0.773. The difference is statistically significant on the likelihood ratio test (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Adding TVL improved the performance of cervical station in predicting prolapse symptoms, validating the practice of using TVL in staging uterine prolapse.

Entities:  

Keywords:  POP-Q; Pelvic organ prolapse; Uterine prolapse; Vaginal length

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30357469     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-018-3779-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  18 in total

1.  A PRACTICAL SYSTEM OF DIAGNOSIS AND CLASSIFICATION OF PELVIC RELAXATIONS.

Authors:  R F PORGES
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1963-12

2.  Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Fiona J Smith; C D'Arcy J Holman; Rachael E Moorin; Nicolas Tsokos
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  The time factor in the assessment of prolapse and levator ballooning.

Authors:  Francisco J Orejuela; Ka Lai Shek; Hans Peter Dietz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Utility of anterior vaginal wall length measurement in vaginal reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Amy F Collins; Paula J Doyle; Smitha Vilasagar; Gunhilde M Buchsbaum
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  POP-Q 2.0: its time has come!

Authors:  Oz Harmanli
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Digital assessment and quantification of pelvic organ prolapse (DPOP-Q): a randomised cross-over diagnostic agreement trial.

Authors:  Ganesh Thiagamoorthy; Martino Zacchè; Linda Cardozo; Madhu Naidu; Ilias Giarenis; Richard Flint; Sushma Srikrishna; Dudley Robinson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Ultrasound assessment of pelvic organ prolapse: the relationship between prolapse severity and symptoms.

Authors:  H P Dietz; O Lekskulchai
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.299

9.  Risk factors associated with an unsuccessful pessary fitting trial in women with pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Clemons; Vivian C Aguilar; Tara A Tillinghast; Neil D Jackson; Deborah L Myers
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Incontinence pessaries: size, POPQ measures, and successful fitting.

Authors:  Charles W Nager; Holly E Richter; Ingrid Nygaard; Marie Fidela Paraiso; Jennifer M Wu; Kimberly Kenton; Shanna D Atnip; Cathie Spino
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.