Literature DB >> 22452543

The influence of uncemented femoral stem length and design on its primary stability: a finite element analysis.

M Reimeringer1, N Nuño, C Desmarais-Trépanier, M Lavigne, P A Vendittoli.   

Abstract

One of the crucial factors for short- and long-term clinical success of total hip arthroplasty cementless implants is primary stability. Indeed, motion at the bone-implant interface above 40 μm leads to partial bone ingrowth, while motion exceeding 150 μm completely inhibits bone ingrowth. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of two cementless femoral stem designs with different lengths on the primary stability. A finite element model of a composite Sawbones(®) fourth generation, implanted with five lengths of the straight prosthesis design and four lengths of the curved prosthesis design, was loaded with hip joint and abductor forces representing two physiological activities: fast walking and stair climbing. We found that reducing the straight stem length from 146 to 54 mm increased the average micromotion from 17 to 52 μm during fast walking, while the peak value increased from 42 to 104 μm. With the curved stem, reducing length from 105 to 54 mm increased the average micromotion from 10 to 29 μm, while the peak value increased from 37 to 101 μm. Similar findings are obtained for stair climbing for both stems. Although the present study showed that femoral stem length as well as stem design directly influences its primary stability, for the two femoral stems tested, length could be reduced substantially without compromising the primary stability. With the aim of minimising surgical invasiveness, newer femoral stem design and currently well performing stems might be used with a reduced length without compromising primary stability and hence, long-term survivorship.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22452543     DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2012.662677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin        ISSN: 1025-5842            Impact factor:   1.763


  11 in total

1.  Analysis of migration of the Nanos® short-stem hip implant within two years after surgery.

Authors:  Stefan Budde; Frank Seehaus; Michael Schwarze; Christof Hurschler; Thilo Floerkemeier; Henning Windhagen; Yvonne Noll; Max Ettinger; Fritz Thorey
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes with the Nanos™ short-stem hip implant at 24 months: A prospective, single-center study.

Authors:  Stefan Budde; Michael Schwarze; Thilo Floerkemeier; Jochen Plagge; Nils Wirries; Henning Windhagen; Fritz Thorey; Alexander Derksen
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-06-06

3.  Development of an Instrument to Assess the Stability of Cementless Femoral Implants Using Vibration Analysis During Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Steven Leuridan; Quentin Goossens; Leonard Cezar Pastrav; Michiel Mulier; Wim Desmet; Jos Vander Sloten; Kathleen Denis
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.316

4.  Assessment of retention force and bone apposition in two differently coated femoral stems after 6 months of loading in a goat model.

Authors:  Knut Harboe; Nils R Gjerdet; Einar Sudmann; Kari Indrekvam; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 5.  Short-stem prostheses in primary total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Shao-Chuan Huo; Fan Wang; Lu-Jue Dong; Wei Wei; Jing-Qi Zeng; Hong-Xing Huang; Qing-Min Han; Rui-Qi Duan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Designing an Optimized Novel Femoral Stem.

Authors:  Parto Babaniamansour; Mehdi Ebrahimian-Hosseinabadi; Anousheh Zargar-Kharazi
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

7.  The Influence of Tribological Pairings and Other Factors on Migration Patterns of Short Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thilo Floerkemeier; Michael Schwarze; Christof Hurschler; Jens Gronewold; Henning Windhagen; Gabriela von Lewinski; Stefan Budde
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Complex Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Small Stems for Big Challenges.

Authors:  Phillip A Bostian; Brian T Grisez; Adam E Klein; Benjamin M Frye
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-03-23

9.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes after total hip arthroplasty with the NANOS neck preserving hip stem: a 10 to 16-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Vincenzo De Santis; Nadia Bonfiglio; Mattia Basilico; Greta Tanzi Germani; Maria Rosaria Matrangolo; Angelo Carosini; Giuseppe Malerba; Giulio Maccauro
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Finite Element Analysis of Different Hip Implant Designs along with Femur under Static Loading Conditions.

Authors:  Chethan K N; Shyamasunder Bhat N; Zuber M; Satish Shenoy B
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2019-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.