Literature DB >> 22451801

Should initial surveillance of vestibular schwannoma be abandoned?

Sarah Eljamel, Musheer Hussain, M Sam Eljamel.   

Abstract

Early diagnosis of vestibular schwannoma (VS) has increased in recent years because of increased longevity and availability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Initial conservative radiological surveillance is often requested by patients and physicians to establish whether these tumors are growing before embarking on intervention. Initial observation of at least 1 year in all small VS was therefore recommended by some authors. We evaluated our prospective skull base database of VSs that were managed with initial radiological surveillance to establish when this policy should be abandoned and what predicts future growth. Fifty-four consecutive patients with VS in our institution who were managed by initial yearly MRI scanning were studied. The MRI data were collected prospectively and analyzed by Kodak CareStream viewing software where VS maximum diameters in three perpendicular planes and volume were calculated. One patient was excluded from the analysis as he had only one MRI follow-up. The median age of the 53 patients was 59 years (range, 26 to 86 years), 25 were males and 28 were females, and 33 were under 65 years of age; 18 VSs were extracanalicular, 18 were intracanalicular, and 17 extended both inside and outside the canal; 21 VSs were 1.2 cm(3) or less, 22 were 1.2 to 4 cm(3), and the rest were >4 cm(3). Using volumetric analysis, 29.72% of conservatively managed VS grew by at least 2 mm per year, and 70.82% did not grow in 5 years. Age, gender, symptoms, and side did not predict future growth. However, growth in the first year was a strong predictor of future growth (p < 0.001) and initial volume was also a strong predictor of future growth (p < 0.05). Twenty-nine percent of observed VSs grew by at least 2 mm per year in the first 5 years of surveillance. As the growth rate is slow, initial radiological surveillance is justified in elderly patients and patients with small VSs and nonserviceable hearing. Growth in the first year was a strong predictor of future growth. The reported treatment effect should be interpreted in the light of 70.24% of VSs that either shrink or do not change in the first 5 years.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; microsurgery; radiosurgery; schwannoma; vestibular

Year:  2011        PMID: 22451801      PMCID: PMC3312417          DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1265824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skull Base        ISSN: 1531-5010


  18 in total

1.  The conservative management of acoustic neuroma: a review of forty-four patients with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  B O'Reilly; C D Murray; D M Hadley
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  2000-04

2.  Long-term hearing results in patients after surgical removal of acoustic tumors with hearing preservation.

Authors:  M J McKenna; C Halpin; R G Ojemann; J B Nadol; W W Montgomery; R A Levine; E Carlisle; R Martuza
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1992-03

3.  Incidence of vestibular schwannomas.

Authors:  M Tos; S Charabi; J Thomsen
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 4.  Conservative management of acoustic neuromas.

Authors:  J M Nedzelski; D A Schessel; A Pfleiderer; E E Kassel; D W Rowed
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 5.  Management of 1000 vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): hearing function in 1000 tumor resections.

Authors:  M Samii; C Matthies
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Radiologic surveillance of acoustic neuromas.

Authors:  S H Selesnick; G Johnson
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1998-11

7.  Preservation of hearing and facial nerve function in resection of acoustic neuroma.

Authors:  J B Nadol; C M Chiong; R G Ojemann; M J McKenna; R L Martuza; W W Montgomery; R A Levine; S F Ronner; R J Glynn
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  The changing clinical presentation of acoustic tumors in the MRI era.

Authors:  S H Selesnick; R K Jackler; L W Pitts
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Preservation of hearing in acoustic neuromas treated by gamma knife surgery.

Authors:  J M Thomassin; J P Epron; J Régis; C Delsanti; A Sarabian; J C Peragut; W Pellet
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.875

10.  A comprehensive analysis of hearing preservation after radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma.

Authors:  Isaac Yang; Michael E Sughrue; Seunggu J Han; Derick Aranda; Lawrence H Pitts; Steven W Cheung; Andrew T Parsa
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  4 in total

1.  A New Sensitive Test Using Virtual Reality and Foam to Probe Postural Control in Vestibular Patients: The Unilateral Schwannoma Model.

Authors:  Grâce Oussou; Christophe Magnani; Ioannis Bargiotas; Georges Lamas; Frederic Tankere; Catherine Vidal
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 4.086

2.  Stereotactic Radiosurgery versus Natural History in Patients with Growing Vestibular Schwannomas.

Authors:  Albert Tu; Peter Gooderham; Paul Mick; Brian Westerberg; Brian Toyota; Ryojo Akagami
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2015-03-02

3.  EAONO position statement on Vestibular Schwannoma: Imaging Assessment Question: How should growth of Vestibular Schwannoma be defined?

Authors:  Romain Kania; Benjamin Vérillaud; Domitille Camous; Charlotte Hautefort; Thomas Somers; Jérôme Waterval; Sébastien Froelich; Philippe Herman
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.017

4.  The Natural History of Small Vestibular Schwannomas.

Authors:  Serra L Aktan; Sarah Finucane; Matthew Kircher; Dennis Moore; Mariah Bashir
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.