Literature DB >> 19747043

A comprehensive analysis of hearing preservation after radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma.

Isaac Yang1, Michael E Sughrue, Seunggu J Han, Derick Aranda, Lawrence H Pitts, Steven W Cheung, Andrew T Parsa.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) has evolved into a practical alternative to open microsurgical resection in the treatment of patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS). Hearing preservation rates in GKS series suggest very favorable outcomes without the possible acute morbidity associated with open microsurgery. To mitigate institutional and practitioner bias, the authors performed an analytical review of the published literature on the GKS treatment of vestibular schwannoma patients. Their aim was to objectively characterize the prognostic factors that contribute to hearing preservation after GKS, as well as methodically summarize the reported literature describing hearing preservation after GKS for VS.
METHODS: A comprehensive search of the English-language literature revealed a total of 254 published studies reporting assessable and quantifiable outcome data obtained in patients who underwent radiosurgery for VSs. Inclusion criteria for articles were 4-fold: 1) hearing preservation rates reported specifically for VS; 2) hearing status reported using the American Association of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) or Gardner-Robertson classification; 3) documentation of initial tumor size; and 4) GKS was the only radiosurgical modality in the treatment. In the analysis only patients with AAO-HNS Class A or B or Gardner-Robertson Grade I or II status at the last follow-up visit were defined as having preserved hearing. Hearing preservation and outcome data were then aggregated and analyzed based on the radiation dose, tumor volume, and patient age.
RESULTS: The 45 articles that met the authors' inclusion criteria represented 4234 patients in whom an overall hearing preservation rate was 51%, irrespective of radiation dose, patient age, or tumor volume. Practitioners who delivered an average < or = 13-Gy dose of radiation reported a higher hearing preservation rate (60.5% at < or = 13 Gy vs 50.4% at > 13 Gy; p = 0.0005). Patients with smaller tumors (average tumor volume < or = 1.5 cm(3)) had a hearing preservation rate (62%) comparable with patients harboring larger tumors (61%) (p = 0.8968). Age was not a significant prognostic factor for hearing preservation rates as in older patients there was a trend toward improved hearing preservation rates (56% at < 65 years vs 71% at > or = 65 years of age; p < 0.1134). The average overall follow-up in the studies reviewed was 44.4 +/- 32 months (median 35 months).
CONCLUSIONS: These data provide a methodical overview of the literature regarding hearing preservation with GKS for VS and a less biased assessment of outcomes than single-institution studies. This objective analysis provides insight into advising patients of hearing preservation rates for GKS treatment of VSs that have been reported, as aggregated in the published literature. Analysis of the data suggests that an overall hearing preservation rate of approximately 51% can be expected approaching 3-4 years after radiosurgical treatment, and the analysis reveals that patients treated with < or = 13 Gy were more likely to have preserved hearing than patients receiving larger doses of radiation. Furthermore, larger tumors and older patients do not appear to be at any increased risk for hearing loss after GKS for VS than younger patients or patients with smaller tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19747043     DOI: 10.3171/2009.8.JNS0985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  36 in total

1.  Hearing thresholds and FMRI of auditory cortex following eighth cranial nerve surgery.

Authors:  Harold Burton; Jill B Firszt; Timothy Holden
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Tinnitus Management in Lateral Skull Base Lesions.

Authors:  Juan San Juan; Gregory J Basura
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-11-30

Review 3.  [Radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of vestibular schwannoma].

Authors:  K Hamm; H-U Herold; G Surber; S Rosahl
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Low-Dose Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas: Tumor Control and Cranial Nerve Function Preservation After 11 Gy.

Authors:  Andrew J Schumacher; Rohan R Lall; Rishi R Lall; Allan Nanney; Amit Ayer; Samir Sejpal; Benjamin P Liu; Maryanne Marymont; Plato Lee; Bernard R Bendok; John A Kalapurakal; James P Chandler
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2016-05-31

5.  Emerging Indications for Fractionated Gamma Knife Radiosurgery.

Authors:  Emory McTyre; Corbin A Helis; Michael Farris; Lisa Wilkins; Darrell Sloan; William H Hinson; J Daniel Bourland; William A Dezarn; Michael T Munley; Kounosuke Watabe; Fei Xing; Adrian W Laxton; Stephen B Tatter; Michael D Chan
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Clinical Results After Single-fraction Radiosurgery for 1,002 Vestibular Schwannomas.

Authors:  Paul Y Windisch; Joerg-Christian Tonn; Christoph Fürweger; Berndt Wowra; Markus Kufeld; Christian Schichor; Alexander Muacevic
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-12-16

7.  Auditory rehabilitation of patients with neurofibromatosis Type 2 by using cochlear implants.

Authors:  Pamela C Roehm; Jon Mallen-St Clair; Daniel Jethanamest; John G Golfinos; William Shapiro; Susan Waltzman; J Thomas Roland
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 8.  The emerging role of hearing loss rehabilitation in patients with vestibular schwannoma treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery: literature review.

Authors:  Carlotta Morselli; N Boari; M Artico; M Bailo; L O Piccioni; I Giallini; M de Vincentiis; P Mortini; P Mancini
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 9.  [Update on diagnostics and microsurgical treatment of vestibular schwannoma].

Authors:  F H Ebner; M Tatagiba
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.214

10.  Should initial surveillance of vestibular schwannoma be abandoned?

Authors:  Sarah Eljamel; Musheer Hussain; M Sam Eljamel
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2011-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.