Literature DB >> 22451338

Extent of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis before knee arthroplasty: multicenter data from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Daniel L Riddle1, William A Jiranek, Robert S Neff, Derek Whitaker, Jason R Hull.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Knee arthroplasty traditionally is recommended for persons with substantial disability and disabling pain attributable to moderate or severe osteoarthritis (OA). Pain and functional status after arthroplasty may be influenced by the extent of knee OA before surgery and recent evidence suggests persons with less severe knee OA before undergoing TKA have greater pain levels and worse function than persons with more severe knee OA. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined the proportion of patients undergoing knee arthroplasty who had less than moderate knee OA before surgery and who had either a radiographically normal medial or lateral joint space before surgery.
METHODS: One hundred sixteen persons in the Osteoarthritis Initiative underwent knee arthroplasty during a 3-year period. Ninety-seven of the 116 patients (84%) had radiographs available less than 1 year before surgery and were included. We used Z-tests to determine whether the proportion of patients with a modified Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade of 3 or higher differed from literature-based estimates. In addition, we described the proportion of patients with medial and lateral joint space narrowing.
RESULTS: The proportion of patients with a modified KL grade of 3 or higher was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.73-0.89) and was less than the 0.95 estimated population proportion. Of the patients who underwent knee arthroplasty, 85% (82 of 97 knee arthroplasties) had at least one tibiofemoral joint compartment that had no joint space narrowing. One in six patients with OA who underwent knee arthroplasty had a KL grade of 2 or lower.
CONCLUSIONS: Variation in the extent of tibiofemoral OA in patients preparing for joint arthroplasty is greater than previously described. A greater percentage of patients undergoing knee arthroplasty may be at risk for increased pain and poorer function than previously assumed after surgery because of less severe knee OA before surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22451338      PMCID: PMC3442002          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2328-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  27 in total

1.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Fixed-flexion radiography of the knee provides reproducible joint space width measurements in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Manish Kothari; Ali Guermazi; Gabriele von Ingersleben; Yves Miaux; Martine Sieffert; Jon E Block; Randall Stevens; Charles G Peterfy
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  NIH Consensus Statement on total knee replacement December 8-10, 2003.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Inverse relationship between preoperative radiographic severity and postoperative pain in patients with osteoarthritis who have undergone total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ana M Valdes; Sally A Doherty; Weiya Zhang; Kenneth R Muir; Rose A Maciewicz; Michael Doherty
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  OARSI/OMERACT initiative to define states of severity and indication for joint replacement in hip and knee osteoarthritis. An OMERACT 10 Special Interest Group.

Authors:  Laure Gossec; Simon Paternotte; Clifton O Bingham; Daniel O Clegg; Philippe Coste; Philip G Conaghan; Aileen M Davis; Giampaolo Giacovelli; Klaus-Peter Gunther; Gillian Hawker; Marc C Hochberg; Joanne M Jordan; Jeffrey N Katz; Margreet Kloppenburg; Arturo Lanzarotti; Keith Lim; L Stefan Lohmander; Nizar N Mahomed; Jean Francis Maillefert; Rebecca L Manno; Lyn M March; Steven A Mazzuca; Karel Pavelka; Leonardo Punzi; Ewa M Roos; Lucio C Rovati; Helen Shi; Jasvinder A Singh; Maria E Suarez-Almazor; Eleonora Tajana-Messi; Maxime Dougados
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.666

7.  Comparison of fixed-flexion positioning with fluoroscopic semi-flexed positioning for quantifying radiographic joint-space width in the knee: test-retest reproducibility.

Authors:  C Peterfy; J Li; S Zaim; J Duryea; J Lynch; Y Miaux; W Yu; H K Genant
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2003-02-06       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 8.  Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Olivier Ethgen; Olivier Bruyère; Florent Richy; Charles Dardennes; Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  R D Altman; M Hochberg; W A Murphy; F Wolfe; M Lequesne
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  Variation in orthopedic surgeons' perceptions of the indications for and outcomes of knee replacement.

Authors:  J G Wright; P Coyte; G Hawker; C Bombardier; D Cooke; D Heck; R Dittus; D Freund
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-03-01       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  4 in total

1.  Survivorship and patient satisfaction of robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum two-year follow-up.

Authors:  Andrew D Pearle; Jelle P van der List; Lily Lee; Thomas M Coon; Todd A Borus; Martin W Roche
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Knee osteoarthritis radiographic progression and associations with pain and function prior to knee arthroplasty: a multicenter comparative cohort study.

Authors:  D L Riddle; W A Jiranek
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 6.576

3.  Pre-operative arthritis severity as a predictor for total knee arthroplasty patients' satisfaction.

Authors:  Christoph Schnurr; Maike Jarrous; Isabell Güdden; Peer Eysel; Dietmar Pierre König
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Why are patients dissatisfied following a total knee replacement? A systematic review.

Authors:  Naoki Nakano; Haitham Shoman; Fernando Olavarria; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Ryosuke Kuroda; Vikas Khanduja
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.075

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.