BACKGROUND: One of the problems with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer is that it prolongs procedure time considerably. AIM: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a videoendoscope with water-jet function shortened the time of ESD for early gastric cancer. METHODS: A total of 82 early gastric cancers that were intramucosal, differentiated-type adenocarcinoma ≤2 cm, without ulcer or scar, in 75 consecutive patients were investigated. Three supervised resident endoscopists participated as operators. After stratification by the operator and tumor location, the lesions were randomly assigned to the water-jet videoendoscope or a conventional videoendoscope groups. An insulated tipped knife was used for the ESD procedure. Total operation time was evaluated as a primary endpoint. RESULTS: The median (25-75th percentile) total operation time for the water-jet videoendoscope group was 51 (33-87) minutes, which was shorter than the 62 (43-88) minutes for the conventional videoendoscope, but it did not reach significance (P = 0.201). Multivariate analysis revealed that the water-jet videoendoscope (OR 3.0, P = 0.046), tumor size ≤14 mm (OR 3.2, P = 0.040) and antral tumor (OR 4.5, P = 0.046) were significantly associated with short (≤60 min) operation time. CONCLUSIONS: The water-jet videoendoscope may reduce operation time of ESD for early gastric cancer, compared with conventional videoendoscope. A large-scale multicenter trial is warranted to clarify the efficacy of the water-jet videoendoscope for gastric ESD.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: One of the problems with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer is that it prolongs procedure time considerably. AIM: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a videoendoscope with water-jet function shortened the time of ESD for early gastric cancer. METHODS: A total of 82 early gastric cancers that were intramucosal, differentiated-type adenocarcinoma ≤2 cm, without ulcer or scar, in 75 consecutive patients were investigated. Three supervised resident endoscopists participated as operators. After stratification by the operator and tumor location, the lesions were randomly assigned to the water-jet videoendoscope or a conventional videoendoscope groups. An insulated tipped knife was used for the ESD procedure. Total operation time was evaluated as a primary endpoint. RESULTS: The median (25-75th percentile) total operation time for the water-jet videoendoscope group was 51 (33-87) minutes, which was shorter than the 62 (43-88) minutes for the conventional videoendoscope, but it did not reach significance (P = 0.201). Multivariate analysis revealed that the water-jet videoendoscope (OR 3.0, P = 0.046), tumor size ≤14 mm (OR 3.2, P = 0.040) and antral tumor (OR 4.5, P = 0.046) were significantly associated with short (≤60 min) operation time. CONCLUSIONS: The water-jet videoendoscope may reduce operation time of ESD for early gastric cancer, compared with conventional videoendoscope. A large-scale multicenter trial is warranted to clarify the efficacy of the water-jet videoendoscope for gastric ESD.
Authors: S Enomoto; N Yahagi; M Fujishiro; M Oka; N Kakushima; M Iguchi; K Yanaoka; K Arii; H Tamai; Y Shimizu; M Omata; M Ichinose Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2007-07-23 Impact factor: 10.093
Authors: A Imagawa; H Okada; Y Kawahara; R Takenaka; J Kato; H Kawamoto; S Fujiki; R Takata; T Yoshino; Y Shiratori Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 10.093
Authors: Shunsuke Yamamoto; N Uedo; R Ishihara; N Kajimoto; H Ogiyama; Y Fukushima; Sachiko Yamamoto; Y Takeuchi; K Higashino; H Iishi; M Tatsuta Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2009-10-02 Impact factor: 10.093
Authors: Ii-Kwun Chung; Jun Haeng Lee; Suck-Ho Lee; Sun-Joo Kim; Joo Young Cho; Won Young Cho; Young Hwangbo; Bo Ra Keum; Jong Jae Park; Hoon-Jai Chun; Hoi Jin Kim; Jae J Kim; Sam-Ryong Ji; Sang Young Seol Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2009-02-27 Impact factor: 9.427