BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is feasible as a treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC) when it is performed by an experienced endoscopist. We investigated whether it was feasible for novice endoscopists to perform ESD for EGC, and how difficult it was to learn the procedure. METHODS: This case series study was performed in a cancer referral center. Three resident endoscopists, who had already learned basic procedures, performed ESD under supervision for 30 consecutive lesions, and their procedures were analyzed. The procedure was divided for assessment into (i) mucosal incision and (ii) submucosal dissection by completion of the circumferential mucosal cut. An insulated-tip knife was used for mucosal incision and submucosal dissection. A total of 90 mucosal EGCs (< or = 2 cm) without ulcers or scars in 87 patients were included. Outcomes were: rates of complete resection, complications, and self-completion; operation time; learning curve; and reasons for change of supervisor as an indicator of difficulty. RESULTS: Among the 90 procedures, there was a good overall complete resection rate of 93 %, with an acceptable complication rate of 4.4 %; the complications were delayed hemorrhage in two patients, and perforations in another two patients that were repaired successfully by endoscopic clipping. The self-completion rate and operation time were significantly worse for submucosal dissection than for mucosal incision. Two of the three operators showed a flat learning curve for submucosal dissection. Difficulty with the procedure was related mainly to uncontrollable hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate supervision, gastric ESD by residents is feasible, with equivalent complete resection rates and acceptable complication rates compared with those of experienced endoscopists, although there was difficulty in achieving sufficient self-completion rates in submucosal dissection. Better control of bleeding during submucosal dissection may be a key to improving the procedure. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart. New York.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is feasible as a treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC) when it is performed by an experienced endoscopist. We investigated whether it was feasible for novice endoscopists to perform ESD for EGC, and how difficult it was to learn the procedure. METHODS: This case series study was performed in a cancer referral center. Three resident endoscopists, who had already learned basic procedures, performed ESD under supervision for 30 consecutive lesions, and their procedures were analyzed. The procedure was divided for assessment into (i) mucosal incision and (ii) submucosal dissection by completion of the circumferential mucosal cut. An insulated-tip knife was used for mucosal incision and submucosal dissection. A total of 90 mucosal EGCs (< or = 2 cm) without ulcers or scars in 87 patients were included. Outcomes were: rates of complete resection, complications, and self-completion; operation time; learning curve; and reasons for change of supervisor as an indicator of difficulty. RESULTS: Among the 90 procedures, there was a good overall complete resection rate of 93 %, with an acceptable complication rate of 4.4 %; the complications were delayed hemorrhage in two patients, and perforations in another two patients that were repaired successfully by endoscopic clipping. The self-completion rate and operation time were significantly worse for submucosal dissection than for mucosal incision. Two of the three operators showed a flat learning curve for submucosal dissection. Difficulty with the procedure was related mainly to uncontrollable hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate supervision, gastric ESD by residents is feasible, with equivalent complete resection rates and acceptable complication rates compared with those of experienced endoscopists, although there was difficulty in achieving sufficient self-completion rates in submucosal dissection. Better control of bleeding during submucosal dissection may be a key to improving the procedure. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart. New York.
Authors: Ji Young Yoon; Choong Nam Shim; Sook Hee Chung; Wan Park; Hyunsoo Chung; Hyuk Lee; Sung Kwan Shin; Sang Kil Lee; Yong Chan Lee; Jun Chul Park Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-07-14 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Zhong-Sheng Lu; Yun-Sheng Yang; Dan Feng; Shu-Fang Wang; Jing Yuan; Jin Huang; Xiang-Dong Wang; Jiang-Yun Meng; Hong Du; Hong-Bin Wang Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2012-12-21 Impact factor: 5.742