Literature DB >> 22449863

Prior action execution has no effect on corticospinal facilitation during action observation.

Michela Loporto1, Craig J McAllister, Martin G Edwards, David J Wright, Paul S Holmes.   

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been used widely in research investigating corticospinal (CS) excitability during action observation. Generally, this work has shown that observation of an action performed by others, in the absence of overt movement, modulates the excitability of the CS pathway in humans. Despite the extent of the literature exploring action observation effects, however, there has been little research to date that has compared observation with the combination of observation and execution directly. Here, we report a single-pulse TMS study that investigated whether CS excitability during action observation was modulated by actions performed by the observers prior to viewing a ball pinching action. The results showed that CS excitability during action observation increased when compared to observation of a static hand, but that there was no additional motor facilitation when participants performed the same action prior to observing it. Our findings highlight the importance of action observation and its consequences on the CS system, whilst also illustrating the limited effect of prior action execution on the CS pathway for a simple action task.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22449863     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  7 in total

1.  Corticospinal excitability is modulated by distinct movement patterns during action observation.

Authors:  M K Huntley; S Muller; Ann-Maree Vallence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Combined action observation and imagery facilitates corticospinal excitability.

Authors:  David J Wright; Jacqueline Williams; Paul S Holmes
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Viewing Instructions Accompanying Action Observation Modulate Corticospinal Excitability.

Authors:  David J Wright; Sheree A McCormick; Jacqueline Williams; Paul S Holmes
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Screen Position Preference Offers a New Direction for Action Observation Research: Preliminary Findings Using TMS.

Authors:  Martin Riach; David J Wright; Zoë C Franklin; Paul S Holmes
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  The acute effects of action observation on muscle strength/weakness and corticospinal excitability in older adults.

Authors:  Kylie K Harmon; Ryan M Girts; Jason I Pagan; Gabriela Rodriguez; Matt S Stock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 2.064

6.  Reflecting on mirror mechanisms: motor resonance effects during action observation only present with low-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Michela Loporto; Paul S Holmes; David J Wright; Craig J McAllister
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Grasp-specific motor resonance is influenced by the visibility of the observed actor.

Authors:  Karen L Bunday; Roger N Lemon; James M Kilner; Marco Davare; Guy A Orban
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-09-11       Impact factor: 4.027

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.