OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the potential impact of proposed DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). METHOD: The study focused on a sample of 933 participants evaluated during the DSM-IV field trial; 657 carried a clinical diagnosis of an ASD, and 276 were diagnosed with a non-autistic disorder. Sensitivity and specificity for proposed DSM-5 diagnostic criteria were evaluated using field trial symptom checklists as follows: individual field trial checklist items (e.g., nonverbal communication); checklist items grouped together as described by a single DSM-5 symptom (e.g., nonverbal and verbal communication); individual DSM-5 criterion (e.g., social-communicative impairment); and overall diagnostic criteria. RESULTS: When applying proposed DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for ASD, 60.6% (95% confidence interval: 57%-64%) of cases with a clinical diagnosis of an ASD met revised DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for ASD. Overall specificity was high, with 94.9% (95% confidence interval: 92%-97%) of individuals accurately excluded from the spectrum. Sensitivity varied by diagnostic subgroup (autistic disorder = 0.76; Asperger's disorder = 0.25; pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified = 0.28) and cognitive ability (IQ < 70 = 0.70; IQ ≥ 70 = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: Proposed DSM-5 criteria could substantially alter the composition of the autism spectrum. Revised criteria improve specificity but exclude a substantial portion of cognitively able individuals and those with ASDs other than autistic disorder. A more stringent diagnostic rubric holds significant public health ramifications regarding service eligibility and compatibility of historical and future research.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the potential impact of proposed DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). METHOD: The study focused on a sample of 933 participants evaluated during the DSM-IV field trial; 657 carried a clinical diagnosis of an ASD, and 276 were diagnosed with a non-autistic disorder. Sensitivity and specificity for proposed DSM-5 diagnostic criteria were evaluated using field trial symptom checklists as follows: individual field trial checklist items (e.g., nonverbal communication); checklist items grouped together as described by a single DSM-5 symptom (e.g., nonverbal and verbal communication); individual DSM-5 criterion (e.g., social-communicative impairment); and overall diagnostic criteria. RESULTS: When applying proposed DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for ASD, 60.6% (95% confidence interval: 57%-64%) of cases with a clinical diagnosis of an ASD met revised DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for ASD. Overall specificity was high, with 94.9% (95% confidence interval: 92%-97%) of individuals accurately excluded from the spectrum. Sensitivity varied by diagnostic subgroup (autistic disorder = 0.76; Asperger's disorder = 0.25; pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified = 0.28) and cognitive ability (IQ < 70 = 0.70; IQ ≥ 70 = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: Proposed DSM-5 criteria could substantially alter the composition of the autism spectrum. Revised criteria improve specificity but exclude a substantial portion of cognitively able individuals and those with ASDs other than autistic disorder. A more stringent diagnostic rubric holds significant public health ramifications regarding service eligibility and compatibility of historical and future research.
Authors: Marja-Leena Mattila; Marko Kielinen; Sirkka-Liisa Linna; Katja Jussila; Hanna Ebeling; Risto Bloigu; Robert M Joseph; Irma Moilanen Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Tracy A Becerra; Ondine S von Ehrenstein; Julia E Heck; Jorn Olsen; Onyebuchi A Arah; Shafali S Jeste; Michael Rodriguez; Beate Ritz Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Matthew J Maenner; Catherine E Rice; Carrie L Arneson; Christopher Cunniff; Laura A Schieve; Laura A Carpenter; Kim Van Naarden Braun; Russell S Kirby; Amanda V Bakian; Maureen S Durkin Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Kris Evers; Jarymke Maljaars; Sarah J Carrington; Alice S Carter; Francesca Happé; Jean Steyaert; Susan R Leekam; Ilse Noens Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Moran Hausman-Kedem; Barry E Kosofsky; Gail Ross; Kaleb Yohay; Emily Forrest; Margaret H Dennin; Reena Patel; Kristen Bennett; James P Holahan; Mary J Ward Journal: J Psychopathol Behav Assess Date: 2018-01-20
Authors: Matthew J Maenner; Laura A Schieve; Catherine E Rice; Christopher Cunniff; Ellen Giarelli; Russell S Kirby; Li-Ching Lee; Joyce S Nicholas; Martha S Wingate; Maureen S Durkin Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 8.829