Literature DB >> 22449423

Parental and societal values for the risks and benefits of childhood combination vaccines.

Courtney Gidengil1, Tracy A Lieu, Katherine Payne, Donna Rusinak, Mark Messonnier, Lisa A Prosser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: New combination vaccines reduce the number of injections needed for immunization. However, possible drawbacks include higher prices, extra doses of vaccine antigens and increased minor adverse events. Our objective was to measure parental and societal values for attributes of childhood combination vaccines.
METHODS: We conducted a discrete choice experiment using an online survey of adults administered by Knowledge Networks. Values were measured for attributes of combination vaccines for a hypothetical child aged 6 months: (1) number of injections, (2) extra dose of hepatitis B vaccine, (3) 20% higher chance of fever, (4) community-level immunization coverage of 2-year-olds of 90% or 80%, and (5) cost per visit. Logistic regression with generalized estimating equations was used to analyze the value of different attributes and generate a marginal willingness-to-pay for a change in attribute level.
RESULTS: The response rate was 64% (N=558). Most respondents were parents (63%) and most respondents agreed that combination vaccines were safe (77%). Respondents were willing to pay $7.68 to avoid an injection (compared to $9.94 when looking at parents only). However, respondents were willing to pay $41.57 to avoid higher risk of fever after one set of immunizations (10% versus 30%) and $65.42 for higher immunization coverage rates. These results were very similar for parents only. There was no significant preference to avoid an extra dose of hepatitis B vaccine.
CONCLUSIONS: Respondents were willing to pay larger amounts to avoid increased risk of minor adverse events and to increase community-level immunization coverage than to avoid injections. These values should be taken into account when determining the risks and benefits of combination vaccines.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22449423     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  18 in total

1.  Parents' preferences for enhanced access in the pediatric medical home: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Joseph S Zickafoose; Lisa R DeCamp; Lisa A Prosser
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 16.193

Review 2.  Risk as an attribute in discrete choice experiments: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Mark Harrison; Dan Rigby; Caroline Vass; Terry Flynn; Jordan Louviere; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 3.  Valuing Meta-Health Effects for Use in Economic Evaluations to Inform Reimbursement Decisions: A Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Richard De Abreu Lourenco; Marion Haas; Jane Hall; Rosalie Viney
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Individual Preferences for Child and Adolescent Vaccine Attributes: A Systematic Review of the Stated Preference Literature.

Authors:  Christine Michaels-Igbokwe; Shannon MacDonald; Gillian R Currie
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Mothers' preferences regarding new combination vaccines for their children in Japan, 2014.

Authors:  Aiko Shono; Masahide Kondo
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  The Value(s) of Vaccination: Building the Scientific Evidence According to a Value-Based Healthcare Approach.

Authors:  Giovanna Elisa Calabro'; Elettra Carini; Alessia Tognetto; Irene Giacchetta; Ester Bonanno; Marco Mariani; Walter Ricciardi; Chiara de Waure
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-03-09

7.  Identifying the impact of social influences in health-related discrete choice experiments.

Authors:  Esther W de Bekker-Grob; Kirsten Howard; Joffre Swait
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 8.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael D Clark; Domino Determann; Stavros Petrou; Domenico Moro; Esther W de Bekker-Grob
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Preferences for vaccination program attributes among parents of young infants in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Zhuoying Huang; Abram L Wagner; Muzi Lin; Xiaodong Sun; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Matthew L Boulton; Jia Ren; Lisa A Prosser
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Correlation between pediatrician supply and public health in Japan as evidenced by vaccination coverage in 2010: secondary data analysis.

Authors:  Rie Sakai; Günther Fink; Wei Wang; Ichiro Kawachi
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.