Literature DB >> 22448161

P53 binding sites in transposons.

Tomasz Zemojtel1, Martin Vingron.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22448161      PMCID: PMC3308033          DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Genet        ISSN: 1664-8021            Impact factor:   4.599


× No keyword cloud information.
Repeated regions of the genome harbor more functional information than commonly assumed. Two decades ago, a highly influential paper describing the consensus binding site for the key transcription factor p53 was published in Nature Genetics by el-Deiry et al. (1992). Recently, it has been observed that many p53 binding sites are species-specific (Jegga et al., 2008), suggesting a remarkable flexibility in the p53 gene regulatory network. Consistent with this idea, several recent studies have reported the existence of p53 binding sites in sequences of primate-specific interspersed repeats, including retroviral long terminal repeats (LTRs; Wang et al., 2007), short (Alus;Zemojtel et al., 2009; Cui et al., 2011), and long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs; Harris et al., 2009), highlighting the role of transposition in the emergence of cis-regulatory elements (Feschotte, 2008; Schmidt et al., 2012). We reanalyzed the 20 genomic sequences originally used by el-Deiry et al. (1992) to construct the p53 consensus binding motif. All of these binding sites could be uniquely mapped to the reference human genome sequence (hg19). Strikingly, as many as seven of these binding sites (∼35%) reside in one of three repeat classes: LTR, LINE, and DNA transposons (Table 1). Interestingly, this small set includes members of the primate-specific LTR10 and MER61 families, which were previously identified as enriched in copies with a functional p53 site (Wang et al., 2007). Additionally, we found that one of the early reported p53 binding sites is composed of a low-complexity repeat.
Table 1

Characterization of 20 sequences reported by el-Deiry et al. (.

CloneaGenomic location (hg19)NameFamilyClass
s57chr13: 114536915–114536965
N22chr11: 44182113–44182162
11A2chr14: 100093893–100093943
W211chr6: 116275323–116275368L2aL2LINE
W7B2chr13: 52641535–52641585MER61EERV1LTR
3Hchr2: 191494065–191494114HSMAR2TcMar-MarinerDNA
8Achr4: 15767109–15767147L2aL2LINE
532chr6: 170765704–170765758
64A2chr6: 88193436–88193496HERVIP10FHERV1LTR
W7A1chr7: 22821881–22821930
S61chr2: 32539190–32539238L1ME3BL1LINE
1183chr10: 121965614–121965661
N42chr7: 47737939–47737989
S201chr12: 113554293–113554341
S1503chr17: 9443256–9443316
S92Ichr19: 44049878–44049927
S592IIchr19: 44049787–44049836
2Nbchr6: 40151946–40151995LTR10B1ERV1LTR
9Hchr4: 49630288–49630337
CBE10dUn_gl000220: 101981–102031(CCTTG) nrepeat

.

Characterization of 20 sequences reported by el-Deiry et al. (. . In summary, the original work of el-Deiry et al. (1992) published 20 years ago already contained evidence for the involvement of transposable elements in spreading species-specific p53 binding sites. This raised the question: how many more gems are hidden in previously generated data sets?
  8 in total

1.  Methylation and deamination of CpGs generate p53-binding sites on a genomic scale.

Authors:  Tomasz Zemojtel; Szymon M Kielbasa; Peter F Arndt; Ho-Ryun Chung; Martin Vingron
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2008-12-26       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  Definition of a consensus binding site for p53.

Authors:  W S el-Deiry; S E Kern; J A Pietenpol; K W Kinzler; B Vogelstein
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 3.  Transposable elements and the evolution of regulatory networks.

Authors:  Cédric Feschotte
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  p53 responsive elements in human retrotransposons.

Authors:  C R Harris; A Dewan; A Zupnick; R Normart; A Gabriel; C Prives; A J Levine; J Hoh
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  Species-specific endogenous retroviruses shape the transcriptional network of the human tumor suppressor protein p53.

Authors:  Ting Wang; Jue Zeng; Craig B Lowe; Robert G Sellers; Sofie R Salama; Min Yang; Shawn M Burgess; Rainer K Brachmann; David Haussler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Functional evolution of the p53 regulatory network through its target response elements.

Authors:  Anil G Jegga; Alberto Inga; Daniel Menendez; Bruce J Aronow; Michael A Resnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Impact of Alu repeats on the evolution of human p53 binding sites.

Authors:  Feng Cui; Michael V Sirotin; Victor B Zhurkin
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 4.540

8.  Waves of retrotransposon expansion remodel genome organization and CTCF binding in multiple mammalian lineages.

Authors:  Dominic Schmidt; Petra C Schwalie; Michael D Wilson; Benoit Ballester; Angela Gonçalves; Claudia Kutter; Gordon D Brown; Aileen Marshall; Paul Flicek; Duncan T Odom
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 41.582

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  The Role of Transposable Elements in the Origin and Evolution of MicroRNAs in Human.

Authors:  Sheng Qin; Ping Jin; Xue Zhou; Liming Chen; Fei Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.