Literature DB >> 22447958

Heart failure in patients with sick sinus syndrome treated with single lead atrial or dual-chamber pacing: no association with pacing mode or right ventricular pacing site.

Sam Riahi1, Jens Cosedis Nielsen, Søren Hjortshøj, Poul Erik B Thomsen, Søren Højberg, Mogens Møller, Dorthe Dalsgaard, Tonny Nielsen, Mogens Asklund, Elsebeth V Friis, Per D Christensen, Erik H Simonsen, Ulrik H Eriksen, Gunnar V H Jensen, Jesper H Svendsen, William D Toff, Jeffrey S Healey, Henning R Andersen.   

Abstract

AIMS: Previous studies indicate that ventricular pacing may precipitate heart failure (HF). We investigated occurrence of HF during long-term follow-up among patients with sick sinus syndrome (SSS) randomized to AAIR or DDDR pacing. Furthermore, we investigated effects of percentage of ventricular pacing (%VP) and pacing site in the ventricle. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We analysed data from 1415 patients randomized to AAIR (n = 707) or DDDR pacing (n = 708). Ventricular pacing leads were recorded as located in either an apical or a non-apical position. The %VP and HF hospitalizations were recorded during follow-up. Patients were classified with new HF, if in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class IV or if presence of ≥2 of: oedema; dyspnoea; NYHA functional class III. Mean follow-up was 5.4 ± 2.4 years. Heart failure hospitalizations did not differ between groups. In the AAIR group, 170 of the 707 (26%) patients developed HF vs. 169 of the 708 (26%) patients in the DDDR group, hazard rate ratio (HR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79-1.22, P = 0.87. In DDDR patients, 146 of the 512 patients (29%) with ventricular leads in an apical position developed HF vs. 28 of the 161 patients (17%) with the leads in a non-apical position, HR 0.67, CI 0.45-1.00, P = 0.05. After adjustments this difference was non-significant. The incidence of HF was not associated with %VP (P = 0.57).
CONCLUSION: In patients with SSS, HF was not associated with pacing mode, %VP, or ventricular lead localization. This suggests that DDDR pacing is safe in patients with SSS without precipitating HF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22447958     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eus069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  11 in total

Review 1.  The importance of avoiding unnecessary right ventricular pacing in clinical practice.

Authors:  Finn Akerström; Miguel A Arias; Marta Pachón; Jesús Jiménez-López; Alberto Puchol; Justo Juliá-Calvo
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-26

Review 2.  Cardiac pacing strategies and post-implantation risk of atrial fibrillation and heart failure events in sinus node dysfunction patients: a collaborative analysis of over 6000 patients.

Authors:  Shaojie Chen; Zhenglong Wang; Marcio Galindo Kiuchi; Bruno Rustum Andrea; Mitchell W Krucoff; Shaowen Liu; Helmut Pürerfellner
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 3.  His Bundle Pacing: Techniques and Outcomes.

Authors:  Mads Brix Kronborg; Jens Cosedis Nielsen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Prevalence and clinical significance of left bundle branch block according to classical or strict definition criteria in permanent pacemaker patients.

Authors:  Andrea Mazza; Maria Grazia Bendini; Raffaele De Cristofaro; Mariolina Lovecchio; Sergio Valsecchi; Massimo Leggio; Giuseppe Boriani
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 2.882

5.  Mid- to Long-Term Clinical and Echocardiographic Effects of Post-procedural Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shun Xu; Enrui Zhang; Zhiyong Qian; Jinyu Sun; Fengwei Zou; Yao Wang; Xiaofeng Hou; Jiangang Zou
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-28

6.  AV timing in pacemaker patients with first-degree AV block: which is preferable, intrinsic AV conduction or pacing?

Authors:  Yoshihiro Aizawa; Toshiko Nakai; Yukitoshi Ikeya; Rikitake Kogawa; Yuki Saito; Kazuto Toyama; Tetsuro Yumikura; Naoto Otsuka; Koichi Nagashima; Yasuo Okumura
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 1.814

Review 7.  Cardiomyopathy induced by artificial cardiac pacing: myth or reality sustained by evidence?

Authors:  Andrés Di Leoni Ferrari; Anibal Pires Borges; Luciano Cabral Albuquerque; Carolina Pelzer Sussenbach; Priscila Raupp da Rosa; Ricardo Medeiros Piantá; Mario Wiehe; Marco Antônio Goldani
Journal:  Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep

8.  Pacemaker-Mediated Programmable Hypertension Control Therapy.

Authors:  Petr Neuzil; Béla Merkely; Andrejs Erglis; Germanas Marinskis; Joris R de Groot; Herwig Schmidinger; Manuel Rodriguez Venegas; Michiel Voskuil; Thomas Sturmberger; Jan Petru; Niels Jongejan; Josef Aichinger; Ginta Kamzola; Audrius Aidietis; Laszlo Gellér; Tomas Mraz; Istvan Osztheimer; Yuval Mika; Steven Evans; Daniel Burkhoff; Karl-Heinz Kuck
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Post-pacemaker implant QRS duration and heart failure admission in patients with sick sinus syndrome and complete atrioventricular block.

Authors:  Wei-Chieh Lee; Hsiu-Yu Fang; Huang-Chung Chen; Yung-Lung Chen; Tzu-Hsien Tsai; Kuo-Li Pan; Yu-Sheng Lin; Mien-Cheng Chen
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2019-05-20

10.  Paced QRS duration predicts left ventricular function in patients with permanent pacemakers - One-year follow-up study using equilibrium radionuclide angiography (ERNA).

Authors:  Gautam Sharma; Sudhir Suryakant Shetkar; Chetan D Patel; Harmandeep Singh; Nitish Naik; Ambuj Roy; Rajnish Juneja; Prashanthan Sanders
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2015-07-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.