Literature DB >> 18090444

Ashley X.

Kristi L Kirschner1, Rebecca Brashler, Teresa A Savage.   

Abstract

The recent case of Ashley X has sparked much recent public debate and controversy, and raises critical questions for physiatrists and rehabilitation professionals. The case came to light when Gunther and Diekema published an article in the October 2006 issue of Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine describing a novel growth attenuation treatment for Ashley X, a 6-yr-old girl with developmental disabilities. Her parents also published a blog about Ashley, with detailed explanations for their rationale in choosing this treatment on behalf of Ashley which involved beliefs about her future and quality of life. Ashley's parents refer to the series of interventions as the Ashley Treatment in their blog, and this phrase has also been adopted by the popular press and others who have commented on the case. In this article we present an analysis of the Ashley X treatment and use a disability ethics approach to examine the perspectives of various stakeholders involved, including Ashley and other girls with extensive disabilities, parents, physicians, and bioethics committees. We conclude with critical questions for physiatrists and other disability specialists who are in a unique position to examine medical controversies involving people with disabilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18090444     DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31815b77b2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  1 in total

Review 1.  Prenatal testing for intellectual disability: misperceptions and reality with lessons from Down syndrome.

Authors:  Kruti Acharya
Journal:  Dev Disabil Res Rev       Date:  2011
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.