BACKGROUND: A recent study showed that methylphenidate induces emergence from isoflurane general anesthesia. Isoflurane and propofol are general anesthetics that may have distinct molecular mechanisms of action. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that methylphenidate actively induces emergence from propofol general anesthesia. METHODS: Using adult rats, the effect of methylphenidate on time to emergence after a single bolus of propofol was determined. The ability of methylphenidate to restore righting during a continuous target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol was also tested. In a separate group of rats, a TCI of propofol was established and spectral analysis was performed on electroencephalogram recordings taken before and after methylphenidate administration. RESULTS: Methylphenidate decreased median time to emergence after a single dose of propofol from 735 s (95% CI: 598-897 s, n = 6) to 448 s (95% CI: 371-495 s, n = 6). The difference was statistically significant (P = 0.0051). During continuous propofol anesthesia with a median final target plasma concentration of 4.0 μg/ml (95% CI: 3.2-4.6, n = 6), none of the rats exhibited purposeful movements after injection of normal saline. After methylphenidate, however, all six rats promptly exhibited arousal and had restoration of righting with a median time of 82 s (95% CI: 30-166 s). Spectral analysis of electroencephalogram data demonstrated a shift in peak power from δ (less than 4 Hz) to θ (4-8 Hz) and β (12-30 Hz) after administration of methylphenidate, indicating arousal in 4/4 rats. CONCLUSIONS: Methylphenidate decreases time to emergence after a single dose of propofol, and induces emergence during continuous propofol anesthesia in rats. Further study is warranted to test the hypothesis that methylphenidate induces emergence from propofol general anesthesia in humans.
BACKGROUND: A recent study showed that methylphenidate induces emergence from isoflurane general anesthesia. Isoflurane and propofol are general anesthetics that may have distinct molecular mechanisms of action. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that methylphenidate actively induces emergence from propofol general anesthesia. METHODS: Using adult rats, the effect of methylphenidate on time to emergence after a single bolus of propofol was determined. The ability of methylphenidate to restore righting during a continuous target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol was also tested. In a separate group of rats, a TCI of propofol was established and spectral analysis was performed on electroencephalogram recordings taken before and after methylphenidate administration. RESULTS:Methylphenidate decreased median time to emergence after a single dose of propofol from 735 s (95% CI: 598-897 s, n = 6) to 448 s (95% CI: 371-495 s, n = 6). The difference was statistically significant (P = 0.0051). During continuous propofol anesthesia with a median final target plasma concentration of 4.0 μg/ml (95% CI: 3.2-4.6, n = 6), none of the rats exhibited purposeful movements after injection of normal saline. After methylphenidate, however, all six rats promptly exhibited arousal and had restoration of righting with a median time of 82 s (95% CI: 30-166 s). Spectral analysis of electroencephalogram data demonstrated a shift in peak power from δ (less than 4 Hz) to θ (4-8 Hz) and β (12-30 Hz) after administration of methylphenidate, indicating arousal in 4/4 rats. CONCLUSIONS:Methylphenidate decreases time to emergence after a single dose of propofol, and induces emergence during continuous propofol anesthesia in rats. Further study is warranted to test the hypothesis that methylphenidate induces emergence from propofol general anesthesia in humans.
Authors: Ken Solt; Joseph F Cotten; Aylin Cimenser; Kin F K Wong; Jessica J Chemali; Emery N Brown Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Ken Solt; Christa J Van Dort; Jessica J Chemali; Norman E Taylor; Jonathan D Kenny; Emery N Brown Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: J J Chemali; J D Kenny; O Olutola; N E Taylor; E Y Kimchi; P L Purdon; E N Brown; K Solt Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: P L Purdon; K J Pavone; O Akeju; A C Smith; A L Sampson; J Lee; D W Zhou; K Solt; E N Brown Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Celena Ma; Ervin Pejo; Megan McGrath; Selwyn S Jayakar; Xiaojuan Zhou; Keith W Miller; Jonathan B Cohen; Douglas E Raines Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 7.892