Literature DB >> 28857763

Competitive Antagonism of Anesthetic Action at the γ-Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptor by a Novel Etomidate Analog with Low Intrinsic Efficacy.

Celena Ma1, Ervin Pejo, Megan McGrath, Selwyn S Jayakar, Xiaojuan Zhou, Keith W Miller, Jonathan B Cohen, Douglas E Raines.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The authors characterized the γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor pharmacology of the novel etomidate analog naphthalene-etomidate, a potential lead compound for the development of anesthetic-selective competitive antagonists.
METHODS: The positive modulatory potencies and efficacies of etomidate and naphthalene-etomidate were defined in oocyte-expressed α1β3γ2L γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors using voltage clamp electrophysiology. Using the same technique, the ability of naphthalene-etomidate to reduce currents evoked by γ-aminobutyric acid alone or γ-aminobutyric acid potentiated by etomidate, propofol, pentobarbital, and diazepam was quantified. The binding affinity of naphthalene-etomidate to the transmembrane anesthetic binding sites of the γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor was determined from its ability to inhibit receptor photoaffinity labeling by the site-selective photolabels [H]azi-etomidate and R-[H]5-allyl-1-methyl-5-(m-trifluoromethyl-diazirynylphenyl) barbituric acid.
RESULTS: In contrast to etomidate, naphthalene-etomidate only weakly potentiated γ-aminobutyric acid-evoked currents and induced little direct activation even at a near-saturating aqueous concentration. It inhibited labeling of γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors by [H]azi-etomidate and R-[H]5-allyl-1-methyl-5-(m-trifluoromethyl-diazirynylphenyl) barbituric acid with similar half-maximal inhibitory concentrations of 48 μM (95% CI, 28 to 81 μM) and 33 μM (95% CI, 20 to 54 μM). It also reduced the positive modulatory actions of anesthetics (propofol > etomidate ~ pentobarbital) but not those of γ-aminobutyric acid or diazepam. At 300 μM, naphthalene-etomidate increased the half-maximal potentiating propofol concentration from 6.0 μM (95% CI, 4.4 to 8.0 μM) to 36 μM (95% CI, 17 to 78 μM) without affecting the maximal response obtained at high propofol concentrations.
CONCLUSIONS: Naphthalene-etomidate is a very low-efficacy etomidate analog that exhibits the pharmacology of an anesthetic competitive antagonist at the γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28857763      PMCID: PMC5645246          DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  55 in total

1.  Allyl m-trifluoromethyldiazirine mephobarbital: an unusually potent enantioselective and photoreactive barbiturate general anesthetic.

Authors:  Pavel Y Savechenkov; Xi Zhang; David C Chiara; Deirdre S Stewart; Rile Ge; Xiaojuan Zhou; Douglas E Raines; Jonathan B Cohen; Stuart A Forman; Keith W Miller; Karol S Bruzik
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 2.  The benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA receptors.

Authors:  E Sigel; A Buhr
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 14.819

3.  Mapping general anesthetic binding site(s) in human α1β3 γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors with [³H]TDBzl-etomidate, a photoreactive etomidate analogue.

Authors:  David C Chiara; Zuzana Dostalova; Selwyn S Jayakar; Xiaojuan Zhou; Keith W Miller; Jonathan B Cohen
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 4.  Flumazenil, naloxone and the 'coma cocktail'.

Authors:  Marco L A Sivilotti
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Alpha5GABAA receptors mediate the amnestic but not sedative-hypnotic effects of the general anesthetic etomidate.

Authors:  Victor Y Cheng; Loren J Martin; Erin M Elliott; John H Kim; Howard T J Mount; Franco A Taverna; John C Roder; John F Macdonald; Amit Bhambri; Neil Collinson; Keith A Wafford; Beverley A Orser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Stereospecific binding of the potent narcotic analgesic (3H) Etorphine to rat-brain homogenate.

Authors:  E J Simon; J M Hiller; I Edelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Gating allosterism at a single class of etomidate sites on alpha1beta2gamma2L GABA A receptors accounts for both direct activation and agonist modulation.

Authors:  Dirk Rüsch; Huijun Zhong; Stuart A Forman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  The in vitro and in vivo enantioselectivity of etomidate implicates the GABAA receptor in general anaesthesia.

Authors:  Delia Belelli; Anna-Lisa Muntoni; Simon D Merrywest; Luc J Gentet; Anna Casula; Helen Callachan; Paola Madau; David K Gemmell; Niall M Hamilton; Jeremy J Lambert; Keith T Sillar; John A Peters
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.250

9.  Reversal agents in anaesthesia and critical care.

Authors:  Nibedita Pani; Pradeep A Dongare; Rajeeb Kumar Mishra
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2015-10

10.  Correction for Inhibition Leads to an Allosteric Co-Agonist Model for Pentobarbital Modulation and Activation of α1β3γ2L GABAA Receptors.

Authors:  Alexis M Ziemba; Stuart A Forman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Etomidate and Etomidate Analog Binding and Positive Modulation of γ-Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptors: Evidence for a State-dependent Cutoff Effect.

Authors:  Megan McGrath; Zhiyi Yu; Selwyn S Jayakar; Celena Ma; Mansi Tolia; Xiaojuan Zhou; Keith W Miller; Jonathan B Cohen; Douglas E Raines
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Selective actions of benzodiazepines at the transmembrane anaesthetic binding sites of the GABAA receptor: In vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  Megan McGrath; Helen Hoyt; Andrea Pence; Stuart A Forman; Douglas E Raines
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2021-09-26       Impact factor: 8.739

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.