Literature DB >> 22446534

Comparing geometric models for orientation: Medial vs. principal axes.

Debbie M Kelly, Stephane Durocher.   

Abstract

Research examining the encoding of geometry for orientation has received considerable attention in the last 25 years with the proposition of a geometric module.1 Supporting the importance of geometry in the formation of a spatial representation, to date the majority of species studied show an encoding of geometry, even when presumably more salient and reliable features could be used. Although studies have shown that animals encode geometric information such as distance, direction or angular amplitude from the environment, few have tested the assumption that geometry is encoded using global properties such as the major principal axis, a strongly supported proposition. Here we present an alternative model to principal axis, specifically medial axis. In addition we describe the straight skeleton model, which may also offer insights into the understanding of geometric encoding by orienting animals.

Year:  2011        PMID: 22446534      PMCID: PMC3306338          DOI: 10.4161/cib.17318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Commun Integr Biol        ISSN: 1942-0889


  9 in total

1.  Pigeons encode relative geometry.

Authors:  D M Kelly; M L Spetch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2001-10

2.  Shape parameters explain data from spatial transformations: comment on Pearce et al. (2004) and Tommasi & Polli (2004).

Authors:  Ken Cheng; C R Gallistel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2005-04

Review 3.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Squaring theory and evidence.

Authors:  Ken Cheng; Nora S Newcombe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-02

Review 4.  Bayesian integration of spatial information.

Authors:  Ken Cheng; Sara J Shettleworth; Janellen Huttenlocher; John J Rieser
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation.

Authors:  K Cheng
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1986-07

6.  Representation of two geometric features of the environment in the domestic chick ( Gallus gallus).

Authors:  Luca Tommasi; Camilla Polli
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Reorienting when cues conflict: evidence for an adaptive-combination view.

Authors:  Kristin R Ratliff; Nora S Newcombe
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-12

8.  Transfer of spatial behavior between different environments: implications for theories of spatial learning and for the role of the hippocampus in spatial learning.

Authors:  John M Pearce; Mark A Good; Peter M Jones; Anthony McGregor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2004-04

9.  Re-orienting in space: do animals use global or local geometry strategies?

Authors:  Debbie M Kelly; Cinzia Chiandetti; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.703

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Skeletal representations of shape in human vision: Evidence for a pruned medial axis model.

Authors:  Vladislav Ayzenberg; Yunxiao Chen; Sami R Yousif; Stella F Lourenco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  On Discriminating between Geometric Strategies of Surface-Based Orientation.

Authors:  Bradley R Sturz; Kent D Bodily
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-04-25

3.  Reorienting in virtual 3D environments: do adult humans use principal axes, medial axes or local geometry?

Authors:  Althea H Ambosta; James F Reichert; Debbie M Kelly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.