Literature DB >> 31173631

Skeletal representations of shape in human vision: Evidence for a pruned medial axis model.

Vladislav Ayzenberg1, Yunxiao Chen2, Sami R Yousif3, Stella F Lourenco1.   

Abstract

A representation of shape that is low dimensional and stable across minor disruptions is critical for object recognition. Computer vision research suggests that such a representation can be supported by the medial axis-a computational model for extracting a shape's internal skeleton. However, few studies have shown evidence of medial axis processing in humans, and even fewer have examined how the medial axis is extracted in the presence of disruptive contours. Here, we tested whether human skeletal representations of shape reflect the medial axis transform (MAT), a computation sensitive to all available contours, or a pruned medial axis, which ignores contours that may be considered "noise." Across three experiments, participants (N = 2062) were shown complete, perturbed, or illusory two-dimensional shapes on a tablet computer and were asked to tap the shapes anywhere once. When directly compared with another viable model of shape perception (based on principal axes), participants' collective responses were better fit by the medial axis, and a direct test of boundary avoidance suggested that this result was not likely because of a task-specific cognitive strategy (Experiment 1). Moreover, participants' responses reflected a pruned computation in shapes with small or large internal or external perturbations (Experiment 2) and under conditions of illusory contours (Experiment 3). These findings extend previous work by suggesting that humans extract a relatively stable medial axis of shapes. A relatively stable skeletal representation, reflected by a pruned model, may be well equipped to support real-world shape perception and object recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31173631      PMCID: PMC6894409          DOI: 10.1167/19.6.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  41 in total

1.  Parsing silhouettes: the short-cut rule.

Authors:  M Singh; G D Seyranian; D D Hoffman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-05

2.  Bent out of shape: The visual inference of non-rigid shape transformations applied to objects.

Authors:  Patrick Spröte; Roland W Fleming
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Segmentation of object outlines into parts: a large-scale integrative study.

Authors:  Joeri De Winter; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-07-25

4.  Localization of shapes: eye movements and perception compared.

Authors:  Dhanraj Vishwanath; Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Medial-point description of shape: a representation for action coding and its psychophysical correlates.

Authors:  I Kovács; A Fehér; B Julesz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes.

Authors:  D Marr; H K Nishihara
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1978-02-23

7.  How are object shape axes defined? Evidence from mirror-image confusions.

Authors:  Thitaporn Chaisilprungraung; Joseph German; Michael McCloskey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Attention as inference: selection is probabilistic; responses are all-or-none samples.

Authors:  Edward Vul; Deborah Hanus; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2009-11

9.  Visual object recognition in patients with right-hemisphere lesions: axes or features?

Authors:  E K Warrington; M James
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Visual perception of shape altered by inferred causal history.

Authors:  Patrick Spröte; Filipp Schmidt; Roland W Fleming
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  4 in total

1.  The Dorsal Visual Pathway Represents Object-Centered Spatial Relations for Object Recognition.

Authors:  Vladislav Ayzenberg; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 6.709

2.  Perception of an object's global shape is best described by a model of skeletal structure in human infants.

Authors:  Vladislav Ayzenberg; Stella Lourenco
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 8.713

3.  Skeletal descriptions of shape provide unique perceptual information for object recognition.

Authors:  Vladislav Ayzenberg; Stella F Lourenco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Neural correlates of local parallelism during naturalistic vision.

Authors:  John Wilder; Morteza Rezanejad; Sven Dickinson; Kaleem Siddiqi; Allan Jepson; Dirk B Walther
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.