Literature DB >> 22444987

Genetics of animal temperament: aggressive behaviour at mixing is genetically associated with the response to handling in pigs.

R B D'Eath1, R Roehe, S P Turner, S H Ison, M Farish, M C Jack, A B Lawrence.   

Abstract

Aggression when pigs are mixed into new social groups has negative impacts on welfare and production. Aggressive behaviour is moderately heritable and could be reduced by genetic selection. The possible wider impacts of selection for reduced aggressiveness on handling traits and activity in the home pen were investigated using 1663 male and female pedigree pigs (898 purebred Yorkshire and 765 Yorkshire × Landrace). Aggressive behaviour was observed over 24 h after pigs were mixed at 10 weeks of age into groups balanced for unfamiliarity and weight. Aggression was highly heritable (duration of involvement in reciprocal fighting h2 = 0.47 ± 0.03, and duration of delivering one-sided aggression h2 = 0.34 ± 0.03). Three weeks after mixing, home pen inactivity (indicated by the frequency of lying) was observed over 24 h. Inactivity was weakly heritable (h2 = 0.05 ± 0.01) but showed no significant genetic association with aggression. Pigs' behaviour during handling by humans was assessed on entry to, whilst inside and on exit from a weigh crate at both mixing and end of test at 22 weeks. Pigs were generally easy to handle, moving easily into and out of the crate. Scores indicating 'very difficult to move' were rare. Handling scores at weighing were weakly heritable (h2 = 0.03 to 0.17), and moderately correlated across the two weighings (rg = 0.28 to 0.76). Aggressive behaviour at mixing was genetically associated with handling at the end of test weighing: pigs that fought and delivered one-sided aggression had handling scores indicating more active behaviour at weighing (e.g. moving quickly into the crate v. fighting rg = 0.41 ± 0.05 and v. bullying rg = 0.60 ± 0.04). Also, there was a genetic association between receiving one-side aggression at mixing and producing high-pitched vocalisations in the weigh crate (rg = 0.78 ± 0.08). Correlated behavioural responses occurring across different challenging situations (e.g. social mixing and human handling) have been described by the concept of animal temperament (also known as coping styles, personality or behavioural syndromes), but this has rarely been demonstrated at the genetic level in farm animals. These findings may have practical implications for the development of breeding programmes aimed at altering animal temperament. Breeding to reduce aggression could result in some reduction in activity at weighing. This would have consequences for animal production, because pigs which are inactive at weighing take longer to move into and out of the weigh crate, and perhaps also for animal welfare.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 22444987     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731109990528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  13 in total

1.  Behavioural genetic differences between Chinese and European pigs.

Authors:  Qingpo Chu; Tingting Liang; Lingling Fu; Huizhi Li; Bo Zhou
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  Identification of chromosomal locations associated with tail biting and being a victim of tail-biting behaviour in the domestic pig (Sus scrofa domesticus).

Authors:  Kaitlin Wilson; Ricardo Zanella; Carlos Ventura; Hanne Lind Johansen; Tore Framstad; Andrew Janczak; Adroaldo J Zanella; Holly Louise Neibergs
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Repeatability and heritability of behavioural types in a social cichlid.

Authors:  Noémie Chervet; Markus Zöttl; Roger Schürch; Michael Taborsky; Dik Heg
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2011-05-04

4.  Rearing in female-only groups and dietary mineral supplementation improves sow welfare in the early parities and lifetime performance.

Authors:  Phoebe Hartnett; Laura A Boyle; Keelin O'Driscoll
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2020-09-21

5.  Diversifying and correlational selection on behavior toward conspecific and heterospecific competitors in brook stickleback (Culaea inconstans).

Authors:  Kathryn S Peiman; Beren W Robinson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Indirect genetic effects and housing conditions in relation to aggressive behaviour in pigs.

Authors:  Irene Camerlink; Simon P Turner; Piter Bijma; J Elizabeth Bolhuis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Personality Research in Mammalian Farm Animals: Concepts, Measures, and Relationship to Welfare.

Authors:  Marie-Antonine Finkemeier; Jan Langbein; Birger Puppe
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-06-28

8.  Suitability of traits related to aggression and handleability for integration into pig breeding programmes: Genetic parameters and comparison between Gaussian and binary trait specifications.

Authors:  Uta König von Borstel; Björn Tönepöhl; Anne K Appel; Barbara Voß; Horst Brandt; Saeid Naderi; Matthias Gauly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Identification of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Porcine MAOA Gene Associated with Aggressive Behavior of Weaned Pigs after Group Mixing.

Authors:  Ruonan Chen; Qingpo Chu; Chunyan Shen; Xian Tong; Siyuan Gao; Xinpeng Liu; Bo Zhou; Allan P Schinckel
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 10.  A Systematic Review of Genomic Regions and Candidate Genes Underlying Behavioral Traits in Farmed Mammals and Their Link with Human Disorders.

Authors:  Amanda B Alvarenga; Hinayah R Oliveira; Shi-Yi Chen; Stephen P Miller; Jeremy N Marchant-Forde; Lais Grigoletto; Luiz F Brito
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.