Literature DB >> 22444718

Quality of life in long-term survivors of metastatic breast cancer.

Jane L Meisel1, Susan M Domchek, Robert H Vonderheide, Anita Giobbie-Hurder, Nancy U Lin, Eric P Winer, Ann H Partridge.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Psychosocial distress is common after a diagnosis of breast cancer. Little is known about the psychosocial adjustment of women living long term with metastatic breast cancer.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of women living with metastatic breast cancer for 5 years or longer. The survey included demographic and medical history, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Revised Impact of Events Scale (IES-R), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-Breast), and the Duke-University of North Carolina (UNC) Functional Social Support (DUFSS) Questionnaire. Demographic and disease characteristics were assessed by using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and the Fisher exact test. The relationships between IES-R, DUFSS, and the HADS were assessed by using the Spearman correlation coefficients. Statistical tests were 2-sided, with significance defined as P ≤ .05.
RESULTS: Eighteen (64%) of 28 eligible women completed the survey. Women who completed the survey were more likely to have had node-positive disease (2P = .0007), to had taken adjuvant therapy (2P = .01), and to have had hormone-receptor positive disease than women who did not (2P = .04). Among those who completed the survey, data from the FACT-Breast and the DUFSS indicated that women are physically functioning well but still face significant emotional challenges. Results from the HADS indicated that 2 (11.1%) of 18 women were depressed and that 2 (11.1%) of 18 women were anxious. Six (33%) of 18 women had scores on the IES-R Scale that indicated a powerful impact of traumatic stress on the ability to function. In the total sample of 18, the IES-R was significantly correlated with the HADS-Anxiety score (Spearman correlation, 0.81; 2P = .0002) but not with the HADS-Depression score (Spearman correlation, 0.40; 2P = .12).
CONCLUSIONS: Although overall quality of life is good in this population of women living long term with metastatic breast cancer, there is a subset of women who are dealing with significant anxiety and depression, and a larger group who are experiencing burdensome sadness, hopelessness, and apprehension about their disease. Ongoing work to address the needs of this population is warranted. Copyright Â
© 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22444718     DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2012.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1526-8209            Impact factor:   3.225


  10 in total

1.  Physical activity and fitness in women with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Jasmine Yee; Glen M Davis; Jane M Beith; Nicholas Wilcken; David Currow; Jon Emery; Jane Phillips; Andrew Martin; Rina Hui; Michelle Harrison; Eva Segelov; Sharon L Kilbreath
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.442

2.  What contributes to long-term quality of life in breast cancer patients who are undergoing surgery? Results of a multidimensional study.

Authors:  Victoria Wittmann; Melinda Látos; Zoltán Horváth; Zsolt Simonka; Attila Paszt; György Lázár; Márta Csabai
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Health-related Quality of Life in Hormone Receptor-Positive Early Breast Cancer: Analyses From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare Health Outcomes Survey.

Authors:  Nadia A Nabulsi; Khatija W Naing; Huiwen Deng; Jenilee Cueto; Alemseged A Asfaw; Colin C Hubbard; Jifang Zhou; Inyoung Lee; Debanjali Mitra; Gregory S Calip; Ernest H Law
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2022-07-11

4.  Quality of Life, Mood, and Prognostic Understanding in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer A Shin; Areej El-Jawahri; Amanda Parkes; Stephen M Schleicher; Helen P Knight; Jennifer S Temel
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 2.947

5.  Metastatic Breast Cancer Collateral Damage Project (MBCCD): Scale development and preliminary results of the Survey of Health, Impact, Needs, and Experiences (SHINE).

Authors:  Timothy J Williamson; Susan M Love; Jessica N Clague DeHart; Alexandra Jorge-Miller; Leah Eshraghi; Heather Cooper Ortner; Annette L Stanton
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 6.  Everolimus plus exemestane for the treatment of advanced breast cancer: a review of subanalyses from BOLERO-2.

Authors:  Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.715

7.  Assessment of quality of life (QoL) in breast cancer patients by using EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR-23 questionnaires: A tertiary care center survey in the western region of Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Muhammad Imran; Rolina Al-Wassia; Shadi Salem Alkhayyat; Mukhtiar Baig; Bashayer Abdulrahim Al-Saati
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Measuring Quality of Life Using Patient-Reported Outcomes in Real-World Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: The Need for a Standardized Approach.

Authors:  Marloes E Clarijs; Jacob Thurell; Friedrich Kühn; Carin A Uyl-de Groot; Elham Hedayati; Maria M Karsten; Agnes Jager; Linetta B Koppert
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Quality of Life and its Related Factors Among Iranian Patients with Metastatic Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer: A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Jabbar Heydari Fard; Ghasem Janbabaei
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2014-09

10.  Sleep Quality and Related Factors in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Yi-Ping Weng; Rei-Mei Hong; Vincent Chin-Hung Chen; Chia-Jui Tsai; Dah-Cherng Yeh; Yu-Hung Fang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.989

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.