BACKGROUND: We conducted a multiinstitutional phase II study of capecitabine in combination with vinorelbine and trastuzumab in patients eligible to receive first- or second-line treatment for human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-positive (HER2(+)) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was designed to test that the true confirmed response rate (CRR) was at most 45% vs. a true CRR of at least 65%. Between March 2005 and June 2008, eligible patients received capecitabine 825 mg/m² orally on days 1 to 14, vinorelbine 25 mg/m² intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, and trastuzumab 8 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 week 1 and 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks. The main outcome measure was CRR. RESULTS: Of 47 women accrued, 45 were evaluable. This design required at least 25 confirmed responses in the 45 evaluable patients for the treatment to be considered promising. Thirty women (67%) achieved a confirmed response; 25 women (56%) had a confirmed partial response (PR); 5 women (11%) had confirmed complete responses (CRs). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.4-16.7 months). Median overall survival was 28.5 months (95% CI, 24.8-36.4 months). CONCLUSIONS: This triplet combination demonstrated promising activity in patients with HER2(+) MBC. Copyright Â
BACKGROUND: We conducted a multiinstitutional phase II study of capecitabine in combination with vinorelbine and trastuzumab in patients eligible to receive first- or second-line treatment for human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-positive (HER2(+)) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was designed to test that the true confirmed response rate (CRR) was at most 45% vs. a true CRR of at least 65%. Between March 2005 and June 2008, eligible patients received capecitabine 825 mg/m² orally on days 1 to 14, vinorelbine 25 mg/m² intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, and trastuzumab 8 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 week 1 and 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks. The main outcome measure was CRR. RESULTS: Of 47 women accrued, 45 were evaluable. This design required at least 25 confirmed responses in the 45 evaluable patients for the treatment to be considered promising. Thirty women (67%) achieved a confirmed response; 25 women (56%) had a confirmed partial response (PR); 5 women (11%) had confirmed complete responses (CRs). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.4-16.7 months). Median overall survival was 28.5 months (95% CI, 24.8-36.4 months). CONCLUSIONS: This triplet combination demonstrated promising activity in patients with HER2(+) MBC. Copyright Â
Authors: H J Burstein; I Kuter; S M Campos; R S Gelman; L Tribou; L M Parker; J Manola; J Younger; U Matulonis; C A Bunnell; A H Partridge; P G Richardson; K Clarke; L N Shulman; E P Winer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-05-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Rupert Bartsch; Catharina Wenzel; Gabriela Altorjai; Ursula Pluschnig; Margaretha Rudas; Robert M Mader; Michael Gnant; Christoph C Zielinski; Guenther G Steger Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-08-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: L Romero Acuña; M Langhi; J Pérez; J Romero Acuña; M Machiavelli; J Lacava; C Vallejo; A Romero; H Fasce; E Ortiz; S Grasso; S Amato; R Rodríguez; M Barbieri; B Leone Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: R B Livingston; G K Ellis; J R Gralow; M A Williams; R White; C McGuirt; B B Adamkiewicz; C A Long Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Francisco J Esteva; Vicente Valero; Daniel Booser; Laura T Guerra; James L Murray; Lajos Pusztai; Massimo Cristofanilli; Banu Arun; Bita Esmaeli; Herbert A Fritsche; Nour Sneige; Terry L Smith; Gabriel N Hortobagyi Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-04-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: P Fumoleau; F M Delgado; T Delozier; A Monnier; M A Gil Delgado; P Kerbrat; E Garcia-Giralt; R Keiling; M Namer; M T Closon Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1993-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michel Marty; Francesco Cognetti; Dominique Maraninchi; Ray Snyder; Louis Mauriac; Michèle Tubiana-Hulin; Stephen Chan; David Grimes; Antonio Antón; Ana Lluch; John Kennedy; Kenneth O'Byrne; PierFranco Conte; Michael Green; Carol Ward; Karen Mayne; Jean-Marc Extra Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-05-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M Spielmann; T Dorval; F Turpin; E Antoine; M Jouve; F Maylevin; D Lacombe; J Rouesse; P Pouillart; T Tursz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1994-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mark D Pegram; Gottfried E Konecny; Carminda O'Callaghan; Malgorzata Beryt; Richard Pietras; Dennis J Slamon Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2004-05-19 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Keith L Knutson; Raphael Clynes; Barath Shreeder; Patrick Yeramian; Kathleen P Kemp; Karla Ballman; Kathleen S Tenner; Courtney L Erskine; Nadine Norton; Donald Northfelt; Winston Tan; Carmen Calfa; Mark Pegram; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Edith A Perez Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2016-04-20 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Sandra M Swain; Sung-Bae Kim; Javier Cortés; Jungsil Ro; Vladimir Semiglazov; Mario Campone; Eva Ciruelos; Jean-Marc Ferrero; Andreas Schneeweiss; Adam Knott; Emma Clark; Graham Ross; Mark C Benyunes; José Baselga Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-04-18 Impact factor: 41.316