Literature DB >> 22444616

Strategies for optimizing nitrogen use by ruminants.

S Calsamiglia1, A Ferret, C K Reynolds, N B Kristensen, A M van Vuuren.   

Abstract

The efficiency of N utilization in ruminants is typically low (around 25%) and highly variable (10% to 40%) compared with the higher efficiency of other production animals. The low efficiency has implications for the production performance and environment. Many efforts have been devoted to improving the efficiency of N utilization in ruminants, and while major improvements in our understanding of N requirements and metabolism have been achieved, the overall efficiency remains low. In general, maximal efficiency of N utilization will only occur at the expense of some losses in production performance. However, optimal production and N utilization may be achieved through the understanding of the key mechanisms involved in the control of N metabolism. Key factors in the rumen include the efficiency of N capture in the rumen (grams of bacterial N per grams of rumen available N) and the modification of protein degradation. Traditionally, protein degradation has been modulated by modifying the feed (physical and chemical treatments). Modifying the rumen microflora involved in peptide degradation and amino acid deamination offers an alternative approach that needs to be addressed. Current evidence indicates that in typical feeding conditions there is limited net recycling of N into the rumen (blood urea-N uptake minus ammonia-N absorption), but understanding the factors controlling urea transport across the rumen wall may reverse the balance to take advantage of the recycling capabilities of ruminants. Finally, there is considerable metabolism of amino acids (AA) in the portal-drained viscera (PDV) and liver. However, most of this process occurs through the uptake of AA from the arterial blood and not during the 'absorptive' process. Therefore, AA are available to the peripheral circulation and to the mammary gland before being used by PDV and the liver. In these conditions, the mammary gland plays a key role in determining the efficiency of N utilization because the PDV and liver will use AA in excess of those required by the mammary gland. Protein synthesis in the mammary gland appears to be tightly regulated by local and systemic signals. The understanding of factors regulating AA supply and absorption in the mammary gland, and the synthesis of milk protein should allow the formulation of diets that increase total AA uptake by the mammary gland and thus reduce AA utilization by PDV and the liver. A better understanding of these key processes should allow the development of strategies to improve the efficiency of N utilization in ruminants.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 22444616     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731110000911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  33 in total

1.  Pre-breeding blood urea nitrogen concentration and reproductive performance of Bonsmara heifers within different management systems.

Authors:  Takula Tshuma; Dietmar Erik Holm; Geoffrey Theodore Fosgate; Dirk Cornelius Lourens
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Sorghum silage supplemented with crambe meal improves dry matter intake and milk production in crossbred Holstein cows.

Authors:  Saulo Alberto do Carmo Araújo; Guilherme Pires Bicalho; Norberto da Silva Rocha; Cláudia Braga Pereira Bento; Marluci Olício Ortêncio
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Insights into the Populations of Proteolytic and Amino Acid-Fermenting Bacteria from Microbiota Analysis Using In Vitro Enrichment Cultures.

Authors:  Junshi Shen; Zhongtang Yu; Weiyun Zhu
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  Productive performance and urinary excretion of mimosine metabolites by hair sheep grazing in a silvopastoral system with high densities of Leucaena leucocephala.

Authors:  Marcos Barros-Rodríguez; Javier Solorio-Sánchez; Juan Ku-Vera; Armín Ayala-Burgos; Carlos Sandoval-Castro; Georgina Solís-Pérez
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 1.559

5.  Use of gallic acid and hydrolyzable tannins to reduce methane emission and nitrogen excretion in beef cattle fed a diet containing alfalfa silage1,2.

Authors:  Isaac A Aboagye; Masahito Oba; Karen M Koenig; Guangyong Y Zhao; Karen A Beauchemin
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Rumen function in vivo and in vitro in sheep fed Leucaena leucocephala.

Authors:  Marcos Antonio Barros-Rodríguez; Francisco Javier Solorio-Sánchez; Carlos Alfredo Sandoval-Castro; Athol Klieve; Rafael Antonio Rojas-Herrera; Eduardo Gaspar Briceño-Poot; Juan Carlos Ku-Vera
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 1.559

7.  Comparative effects of two multispecies direct-fed microbial products on energy status, nutrient digestibility, and ruminal fermentation, bacterial community, and metabolome of beef steers.

Authors:  Ibukun M Ogunade; Megan McCoun; Modoluwamu D Idowu; Sunday O Peters
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Nutritional and ecological evaluation of dairy farming systems based on concentrate feeding regimes in semi-arid environments of Jordan.

Authors:  Othman Alqaisi; Torsten Hemme; Martin Hagemann; Andreas Susenbeth
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 4.219

9.  Effect of protected-glutamine supplementation on performance, milk composition and some blood metabolites in fresh Holstein cows.

Authors:  M Nemati; S Menatian; Sh Joz Ghasemi; R Hooshmandfar; M Taheri; T Saifi
Journal:  Iran J Vet Res       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.376

10.  Level of Leucaena leucocephala silage feeding on intake, rumen fermentation, and nutrient digestibility in dairy steers.

Authors:  Nguyen Thien Truong Giang; Metha Wanapat; Kampanat Phesatcha; Sungchhang Kang
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 1.559

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.