Literature DB >> 22444119

Parent-of-origin effects cause genetic variation in pig performance traits.

N Neugebauer1, H Luther, N Reinsch.   

Abstract

In order to assess the relative importance of genomic imprinting for the genetic variation of traits economically relevant for pork production, a data set containing 21 209 records from Large White pigs was analysed. A total of 33 traits for growth, carcass composition and meat quality were investigated. All traits were recorded between 1997 and 2006 at a test station in Switzerland and the pedigree included 15 747 ancestors. A model with two genetic effects for each animal was applied: the first corresponds to a paternal and the second to a maternal expression pattern of imprinted genes. The imprinting variance was estimated as the sum of both corresponding genetic variances per animal minus twice the covariance. The null hypothesis of no imprinting was tested by a restricted maximum likelihood ratio test with two degrees of freedom. Genomic imprinting significantly contributed to the genetic variance of 19 traits. The proportion of the total additive genetic variance that could be attributed to genomic imprinting was of the order between 5% and 19%.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 22444119     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731109991625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  12 in total

1.  Joint QTL analysis of three connected F2-crosses in pigs.

Authors:  Christine Rückert; Jörn Bennewitz
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 4.297

2.  Neuronal genes for subcutaneous fat thickness in human and pig are identified by local genomic sequencing and combined SNP association study.

Authors:  Kyung-Tai Lee; Mi-Jeong Byun; Kyung-Soo Kang; Eung-Woo Park; Seung-Hwan Lee; Seoae Cho; Hyoyoung Kim; Kyu-Won Kim; Taeheon Lee; Jong-Eun Park; Woncheoul Park; Donghyun Shin; Hong-Seog Park; Jin-Tae Jeon; Bong-Hwan Choi; Gul-Won Jang; Sang-Haeng Choi; Dae-Won Kim; Dajeong Lim; Hae-Suk Park; Mi-Rim Park; Jurg Ott; Lawrence B Schook; Tae-Hun Kim; Heebal Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Genomic best linear unbiased prediction method including imprinting effects for genomic evaluation.

Authors:  Motohide Nishio; Masahiro Satoh
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 4.297

4.  A new model for parent-of-origin effect analyses applied to Brown Swiss cattle slaughterhouse data.

Authors:  I Blunk; M Mayer; H Hamann; N Reinsch
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Genomic imprinting analyses identify maternal effects as a cause of phenotypic variability in type 1 diabetes and rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Inga Blunk; Hauke Thomsen; Norbert Reinsch; Manfred Mayer; Asta Försti; Jan Sundquist; Kristina Sundquist; Kari Hemminki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Reciprocal F1 Hybrids of Two Inbred Mouse Strains Reveal Parent-of-Origin and Perinatal Diet Effects on Behavior and Expression.

Authors:  Daniel Oreper; Sarah A Schoenrock; Rachel McMullan; Robin Ervin; Joseph Farrington; Darla R Miller; Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena; William Valdar; Lisa M Tarantino
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  Maternal and paternal genomes differentially affect myofibre characteristics and muscle weights of bovine fetuses at midgestation.

Authors:  Ruidong Xiang; Mani Ghanipoor-Samami; William H Johns; Tanja Eindorf; David L Rutley; Zbigniew A Kruk; Carolyn J Fitzsimmons; Dana A Thomsen; Claire T Roberts; Brian M Burns; Gail I Anderson; Paul L Greenwood; Stefan Hiendleder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Consequences of paternally inherited effects on the genetic evaluation of maternal effects.

Authors:  Luis Varona; Sebastián Munilla; Joaquim Casellas; Carlos Moreno; Juan Altarriba
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  The architecture of parent-of-origin effects in mice.

Authors:  Richard Mott; Wei Yuan; Pamela Kaisaki; Xiangchao Gan; James Cleak; Andrew Edwards; Amelie Baud; Jonathan Flint
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Genomic prediction using models with dominance and imprinting effects for backfat thickness and average daily gain in Danish Duroc pigs.

Authors:  Xiangyu Guo; Ole Fredslund Christensen; Tage Ostersen; Yachun Wang; Mogens Sandø Lund; Guosheng Su
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.