Literature DB >> 22442920

Caesarean section in the world: a new ecological approach.

A Zizza1, A Tinelli, A Malvasi, E Barbone, M Stark, A De Donno, M Guido.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to estimate the most recent caesarean section rates in the world and examine the association between these rates and old and new indicators of health care.
METHODS: Authors analyzed the Caesarean Section (CS) rates, also in geo-economic and economic groups, and correlated them to maternal and neonatal mortality, to births attended by skilled health personnel and to births among adolescents. Analysis of covariance and piecewise regressions were used for the statistical analysis.
RESULTS: In 47.2% of the countries, the CS rate exceeded 15%. Countries of Latin America and the Caribbean along with Europe, North America and Oceania had the highest values. The analysis showed an inverse association between CS rates and Maternal Mortality (MMR) and Neonatal Mortality (NMR) for all geographical areas except for Europe. The greatest association was observed in lower-middle-income countries. In developing countries only 50% of cases, occur in medical facilities and only half of these are seen by medical, nursing and obstetrical staff. Age of the mother appears to influence the outcome and choice of delivery type. Countries where an high ABR rate is present have low CS use.
CONCLUSIONS: To best evaluate the consequences of the increasing rate of CS, it would be useful to identify the most sensitive outcome indicators.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22442920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prev Med Hyg        ISSN: 1121-2233


  10 in total

1.  Selection of a correct treatment protocol in caesarean scar pregnancies.

Authors:  Orhan Altınboğa; Betül Yakıştıran; Seyit Ahmet Erol; Yüksel Oğuz; Batuhan Bakırarar; Cavidan Gülerman; Şevki Çelen; Ali Turhan Çağlar
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Caesarean Section Frequency among Immigrants, Second- and Third-Generation Women, and Non-Immigrants: Prospective Study in Berlin/Germany.

Authors:  Matthias David; Theda Borde; Silke Brenne; Wolfgang Henrich; Jürgen Breckenkamp; Oliver Razum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Pregnancy outcomes associated with Cesarean deliveries in Peruvian public health facilities.

Authors:  Gustavo F Gonzales; Vilma L Tapia; Alfredo L Fort; Ana Pilar Betran
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2013-10-04

4.  Variations in childbirth interventions in high-income countries: protocol for a multinational cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Anna Seijmonsbergen-Schermers; Thomas van den Akker; Katrien Beeckman; Annick Bogaerts; Monalisa Barros; Patricia Janssen; Lorena Binfa; Eva Rydahl; Lucy Frith; Mechthild M Gross; Berglind Hálfdánsdóttir; Deirdre Daly; Jean Calleja-Agius; Patricia Gillen; Anne Britt Vika Nilsen; Eugene Declercq; Ank de Jonge
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies.

Authors:  Ana Pilar Betran; Maria Regina Torloni; Jun Zhang; Jiangfeng Ye; Rafael Mikolajczyk; Catherine Deneux-Tharaux; Olufemi Taiwo Oladapo; João Paulo Souza; Özge Tunçalp; Joshua Peter Vogel; Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 3.223

6.  A global reference for caesarean section rates (C-Model): a multicountry cross-sectional study.

Authors:  J P Souza; A P Betran; A Dumont; B de Mucio; C M Gibbs Pickens; C Deneux-Tharaux; E Ortiz-Panozo; E Sullivan; E Ota; G Togoobaatar; G Carroli; H Knight; J Zhang; J G Cecatti; J P Vogel; K Jayaratne; M C Leal; M Gissler; N Morisaki; N Lack; O T Oladapo; Ö Tunçalp; P Lumbiganon; R Mori; S Quintana; A D Costa Passos; A C Marcolin; A Zongo; B Blondel; B Hernández; C J Hogue; C Prunet; C Landman; C Ochir; C Cuesta; C Pileggi-Castro; D Walker; D Alves; E Abalos; Ecd Moises; E M Vieira; G Duarte; G Perdona; I Gurol-Urganci; K Takahiko; L Moscovici; L Campodonico; L Oliveira-Ciabati; M Laopaiboon; M Danansuriya; M Nakamura-Pereira; M L Costa; M R Torloni; M R Kramer; P Borges; P B Olkhanud; R Pérez-Cuevas; S B Agampodi; S Mittal; S Serruya; V Bataglia; Z Li; M Temmerman; A M Gülmezoglu
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 6.531

7.  Obstetricians' Opinions of the Optimal Caesarean Rate: A Global Survey.

Authors:  Francesca L Cavallaro; Jenny A Cresswell; Carine Ronsmans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  First birth cesarean proportion: A missed indicator in controlling policies.

Authors:  Roya Safari-Faramani; Ali Akbar Haghdoost; Nouzar Nakhaei; Shohreh Foroudnia; Zahra Mahmoodabadi; Mansooreh Safizadeh
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2016-07-10

9.  Does an Immigrant Background Affect the Indication, Incidence or Outcome of Emergency Cesarean Section? Results of the Prospective Data Collection of 111 Births.

Authors:  Matthias David; Katrin Alexandra Scherer; Wolfgang Henrich; Jürgen Breckenkamp
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 2.915

10.  Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population-based ecological study with longitudinal data.

Authors:  J Ye; J Zhang; R Mikolajczyk; M R Torloni; A M Gülmezoglu; A P Betran
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 6.531

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.