Literature DB >> 22442162

Offering people a choice for colorectal cancer screening.

Carlo Senore1, Andrea Ederle, Luca Benazzato, Arrigo Arrigoni, Marco Silvani, Alberto Fantin, Mario Fracchia, Paola Armaroli, Nereo Segnan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the population coverage and diagnostic yield of offering an immunochemical faecal occult blood test (FIT) to non-responders to a flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) invitation.
DESIGN: A cohort study conducted in a population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme. In this programme, eligible men and women aged 58 (Turin; 43,748 subjects) or 60 (Verona; 19,970 subjects) are invited, with a personal letter signed by their general practitioner, to undergo an FS. Bowel preparation is limited to a single enema self-administered at home. Subjects in whom one distal polyp >5 mm (≥ 10 mm in Turin) or at least one adenoma (one advanced adenoma or more than two adenomas in Turin) is detected at FS are referred for colonoscopy. People who do not respond to the invitation to undergo an FS are invited to have an FIT (OC-Sensor; Eiken, Tokyo, Japan; single sample, cut-off 100 ng/ml). Attendance rate and neoplasia yield were analysed in four consecutive birth cohorts.
RESULTS: Overall participation rate for the FS invitation was 39.3% in Verona and 29.9% in Turin. Of the eligible non-responders to the FS invitation, 19.3% (95% CI 18.9% to 19.7%) underwent an FIT. As a result, the proportion of people undergoing screening by FS or FIT was 55.2% in Verona and 39.3% in Turin, with no gender differences in either centre. FIT detected 8.3% of all advanced adenomas and 20.4% of all CRCs diagnosed at screening.
CONCLUSIONS: A strategy involving the sequential offer of FS and FIT is a feasible and efficient approach. FIT in people not attending for FS increases screening uptake and detection of advanced adenomas and CRCs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22442162     DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  10 in total

Review 1.  Faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening: the past or the future.

Authors:  Sally C Benton; Helen E Seaman; Stephen P Halloran
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2015-02

Review 2.  Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Physicians and Patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; C Richard Boland; Jason A Dominitz; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Tonya Kaltenbach; Theodore R Levin; David Lieberman; Douglas J Robertson
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  The impact of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Luiz Ronaldo Alberti; David Correa Alves De Lima; Kelly Cristine De Lacerda Rodrigues; Marcos Paulo Lima Taranto; Sergio Henrique Leão Gonçalves; Andy Petroianu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Colorectal cancer screening--optimizing current strategies and new directions.

Authors:  Ernst J Kuipers; Thomas Rösch; Michael Bretthauer
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  Recommendations on Fecal Immunochemical Testing to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia: A Consensus Statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Douglas J Robertson; Jeffrey K Lee; C Richard Boland; Jason A Dominitz; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Tonya Kaltenbach; David Lieberman; Theodore R Levin; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 6.  Colorectal cancer screening: tests, strategies, and perspectives.

Authors:  Fabrizio Stracci; Manuel Zorzi; Grazia Grazzini
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2014-10-27

7.  Effect of Sequential or Active Choice for Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Shivan J Mehta; Vikranth Induru; David Santos; Catherine Reitz; Timothy McAuliffe; Charles Orellana; Kevin G Volpp; David A Asch; Chyke A Doubeni
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-08-02

8.  Implementation of long-term non-participant reminders for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening.

Authors:  R S Kerrison; A Prentice; S Marshall; S Choglay; S Stoffel; C Rees; C von Wagner
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2021-01-04

9.  The performance of three-sample qualitative immunochemical fecal test to detect colorectal adenoma and cancer in gastrointestinal outpatients: an observational study.

Authors:  Dong Wu; Han-Qing Luo; Wei-Xun Zhou; Jia-Ming Qian; Jing-Nan Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effect of once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on the outcomes of subsequent faecal occult blood test screening.

Authors:  Jeremy P Brown; Kate Wooldrage; Ines Kralj-Hans; Suzanne Wright; Amanda J Cross; Wendy S Atkin
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 2.136

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.