BACKGROUND: Outcomes in adult patients with rhabdomyosarcoma are poor, with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 30 %. The current study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of adult and childhood rhabdomyosarcoma patients with local and metastatic disease and to examine the impact and timing of local therapy on metastasis. METHODS: Clinicopathological features and patient outcomes were reviewed retrospectively for rhabdomyosarcoma patients receiving chemotherapy between 1981 and 2010 at our institution. Adults were defined as those aged 21 years or older. RESULTS: Of the 98 patients identified, 36 were adults (median age, 29; range, 21-72) and 62 were children (median age, 11; range, 0.6-20). Median progression-free survival of localized and metastatic disease for children and adults was as follows: localized disease, 166.9 versus 22.4 months (p = 0.005), and metastatic disease, 13.3 versus 13.3 months (p = 0.949), respectively. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that older age (≥ 21 vs. <21) was a significant poor prognostic factor in localized disease. Conversely, age was not related to survival in metastatic disease. Receiving radiotherapy to the primary site was an independent factor indicating a better prognosis. An analysis of the optimal timing of local therapy was performed for 53 patients; however, its significance on survival could not be determined. CONCLUSIONS: Age was a negative prognostic factor in rhabdomyosarcoma patients with localized disease, but it did not affect the survival in metastatic disease. For metastatic disease, although local therapies may be effective for survival, the timing of such therapies should be determined individually.
BACKGROUND: Outcomes in adult patients with rhabdomyosarcoma are poor, with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 30 %. The current study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of adult and childhood rhabdomyosarcomapatients with local and metastatic disease and to examine the impact and timing of local therapy on metastasis. METHODS: Clinicopathological features and patient outcomes were reviewed retrospectively for rhabdomyosarcomapatients receiving chemotherapy between 1981 and 2010 at our institution. Adults were defined as those aged 21 years or older. RESULTS: Of the 98 patients identified, 36 were adults (median age, 29; range, 21-72) and 62 were children (median age, 11; range, 0.6-20). Median progression-free survival of localized and metastatic disease for children and adults was as follows: localized disease, 166.9 versus 22.4 months (p = 0.005), and metastatic disease, 13.3 versus 13.3 months (p = 0.949), respectively. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that older age (≥ 21 vs. <21) was a significant poor prognostic factor in localized disease. Conversely, age was not related to survival in metastatic disease. Receiving radiotherapy to the primary site was an independent factor indicating a better prognosis. An analysis of the optimal timing of local therapy was performed for 53 patients; however, its significance on survival could not be determined. CONCLUSIONS: Age was a negative prognostic factor in rhabdomyosarcomapatients with localized disease, but it did not affect the survival in metastatic disease. For metastatic disease, although local therapies may be effective for survival, the timing of such therapies should be determined individually.
Authors: Alberto S Pappo; Elizabeth Lyden; Phillip Breitfeld; Sarah S Donaldson; Eugene Wiener; David Parham; Kristine R Crews; Peter Houghton; William H Meyer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Richard Beverly Raney; Jane Meza; James R Anderson; Christopher J Fryer; Sarah S Donaldson; John C Breneman; Thomas J Fitzgerald; Edmund A Gehan; Jeff M Michalski; Jorge A Ortega; Stephen J Qualman; Eric Sandler; Moody D Wharam; Eugene S Wiener; Harold M Maurer; William M Crist Journal: Med Pediatr Oncol Date: 2002-01
Authors: Joanne J Lager; Elizabeth R Lyden; James R Anderson; Alberto S Pappo; William H Meyer; Philip P Breitfeld Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-07-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: H M Maurer; E A Gehan; M Beltangady; W Crist; P S Dickman; S S Donaldson; C Fryer; D Hammond; D M Hays; J Herrmann Journal: Cancer Date: 1993-03-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: H M Maurer; M Beltangady; E A Gehan; W Crist; D Hammond; D M Hays; R Heyn; W Lawrence; W Newton; J Ortega Journal: Cancer Date: 1988-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Odile Oberlin; Annie Rey; Elizabeth Lyden; Gianni Bisogno; Michael C G Stevens; William H Meyer; Modesto Carli; James R Anderson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-05-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Mark A Kashtan; Thejus T Jayakrishnan; Rahul Rajeev; John C Charlson; Fabian Johnston; T Clark Gamblin; Kiran K Turaga Journal: Int J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-12-08 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Sarah N Dumont; Dejka M Araujo; Mark F Munsell; Jason A Salganick; Amaury G Dumont; Kevin A Raymond; Claude Linassier; Shreyaskumar Patel; Robert S Benjamin; Jonathan C Trent Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2013-07-15 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Maha A T Elsebaie; Mohamed Amgad; Ahmed Elkashash; Ahmed Saber Elgebaly; Gehad Gamal E L Ashal; Emad Shash; Zeinab Elsayed Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-06-19 Impact factor: 4.379