BACKGROUND: Previous studies have yielded conflicting results on the adenoma detection rate with narrow band imaging (NBI) compared with white light imaging (WLI). To overcome the confounding factors of these studies, we aimed to evaluate the colonic adenoma detection rate with primary NBI versus that with primary WLI by using consistent NBI system, endoscope, and imaging settings, and experienced colonoscopists. METHODS: In this multicenter prospective trial, 813 patients were randomized to undergo high-definition, tandem colonoscopy in the right colon with either NBI followed by WLI (NBI-WLI group) or WLI followed by NBI (WLI-NBI group). The NBI settings were fixed at surface structure enhancement level A-5 and adaptive index of hemoglobin color enhancement level 3. All detected polyps were resected or biopsied for histopathological analysis. The primary and secondary outcome measures were the adenoma detection rates and miss rates, respectively, with primary imaging. RESULTS: The NBI-WLI and WLI-NBI groups comprised 389 and 393 patients, respectively, who met the inclusion criteria. The groups did not differ significantly in age, gender, institution, indication for colonoscopy, bowel preparation, or observation time. The adenoma detection rates of primary NBI and WLI were 42.3 and 42.5 %, respectively [difference not significant (NS)]. The adenoma miss rate was significantly less with primary NBI than with primary WLI (21.3 vs. 27.8 %; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: NBI does not improve the adenoma detection rate during primary colonoscopy; however, it has a lower miss rate for adenoma lesions in the proximal colon than WLI.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have yielded conflicting results on the adenoma detection rate with narrow band imaging (NBI) compared with white light imaging (WLI). To overcome the confounding factors of these studies, we aimed to evaluate the colonic adenoma detection rate with primary NBI versus that with primary WLI by using consistent NBI system, endoscope, and imaging settings, and experienced colonoscopists. METHODS: In this multicenter prospective trial, 813 patients were randomized to undergo high-definition, tandem colonoscopy in the right colon with either NBI followed by WLI (NBI-WLI group) or WLI followed by NBI (WLI-NBI group). The NBI settings were fixed at surface structure enhancement level A-5 and adaptive index of hemoglobin color enhancement level 3. All detected polyps were resected or biopsied for histopathological analysis. The primary and secondary outcome measures were the adenoma detection rates and miss rates, respectively, with primary imaging. RESULTS: The NBI-WLI and WLI-NBI groups comprised 389 and 393 patients, respectively, who met the inclusion criteria. The groups did not differ significantly in age, gender, institution, indication for colonoscopy, bowel preparation, or observation time. The adenoma detection rates of primary NBI and WLI were 42.3 and 42.5 %, respectively [difference not significant (NS)]. The adenoma miss rate was significantly less with primary NBI than with primary WLI (21.3 vs. 27.8 %; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: NBI does not improve the adenoma detection rate during primary colonoscopy; however, it has a lower miss rate for adenoma lesions in the proximal colon than WLI.
Authors: Daniel C DeMarco; Elizabeth Odstrcil; Luis F Lara; David Bass; Chase Herdman; Timothy Kinney; Kapil Gupta; Leon Wolf; Thomas Dewar; Thomas M Deas; Manoj K Mehta; M Badar Anwer; Randall Pellish; J Kent Hamilton; Daniel Polter; K Gautham Reddy; Ira Hanan Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: A Adler; H Pohl; I S Papanikolaou; H Abou-Rebyeh; G Schachschal; W Veltzke-Schlieker; A C Khalifa; E Setka; M Koch; B Wiedenmann; T Rösch Journal: Gut Date: 2007-08-06 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M N Ho; M J O'Brien; L S Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; M Schapiro; J H Bond; J F Panish Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1993-12-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Simon L Goede; Karen M Kuntz; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Amy B Knudsen; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Florence K Tangka; David H Howard; Joseph Chin; Ann G Zauber; Laura C Seeff Journal: Med Care Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 2.983