Literature DB >> 22441022

The Cataract National Dataset electronic multi-centre audit of 55,567 operations: risk indicators for monocular visual acuity outcomes.

J M Sparrow1, H Taylor, K Qureshi, R Smith, K Birnie, R L Johnston.   

Abstract

AIMS: To report risk factors for visual acuity (VA) improvement and harm following cataract surgery using electronically collected multi-centre data conforming to the Cataract National Dataset (CND).
METHODS: Routinely collected anonymised data were remotely extracted from the electronic patient record systems of 12 participating NHS Trusts undertaking cataract surgery. Following data checks and cleaning, analyses were performed to identify risk indicators for: (1) a good acuity outcome (VA 6/12 or better), (2) the pre- to postoperative change in VA, and (3) VA loss (doubling or worse of the visual angle).
RESULTS: In all, 406 surgeons from 12 NHS Trusts submitted data on 55,567 cataract operations. Preoperative VA was known for 55,528 (99.9%) and postoperative VA outcome for 40,758 (73.3%) operations. Important adverse preoperative risk indicators found in at least 2 of the 3 analyses included older age (3), short axial length (3), any ocular comorbidity (3), age-related macular degeneration (2), diabetic retinopathy (3), amblyopia (2), corneal pathology (2), previous vitrectomy (2), and posterior capsule rupture (PCR) during surgery (3). PCR was the only potentially modifiable adverse risk indicator and was powerfully associated with VA loss (OR=5.74).
CONCLUSION: Routinely collected electronic data conforming to the CND provide sufficient detail for identification and quantification of preoperative risk indicators for VA outcomes of cataract surgery. The majority of risk indicators are intrinsic to the patient or their eye, with a notable exception being PCR during surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22441022      PMCID: PMC3376295          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2012.51

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  12 in total

1.  Comparison of the visual function index to the Snellen Visual Acuity Test in predicting older adult self-restricted driving.

Authors:  Shahram Lotfipour; Bhakti Harishchandra Patel; Thomas Aaron Grotsky; Craig L Anderson; Erin M Carr; Suleman Syed Ahmed; Bharath Chakravarthy; John Christian Fox; Federico E Vaca
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.491

2.  The cataract national data set electronic multi-centre audit of 55,567 operations: case-mix adjusted surgeon's outcomes for posterior capsule rupture.

Authors:  J M Sparrow; H Taylor; K Qureshi; R Smith; R L Johnston
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Visual function and outcomes after cataract surgery in a Singapore population.

Authors:  Seang-Mei Saw; Peter Tseng; Wing-Kwong Chan; Tat-Keong Chan; Sze-Guan Ong; Donald Tan
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Visual outcomes of cataract surgery in the United States, Canada, Denmark, and Spain. Report From the International Cataract Surgery Outcomes Study.

Authors:  J C Norregaard; C Hindsberger; J Alonso; L Bellan; P Bernth-Petersen; C Black; E Dunn; T F Andersen; M Espallargues; G F Anderson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-08

5.  The Cataract National Dataset Electronic Multi-centre Audit of 55,567 operations: anaesthetic techniques and complications.

Authors:  N El-Hindy; R L Johnston; P Jaycock; T Eke; A J Braga; D M Tole; P Galloway; J M Sparrow
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  The Cataract National Dataset electronic multi-centre audit of 55,567 operations: updating benchmark standards of care in the United Kingdom and internationally.

Authors:  P Jaycock; R L Johnston; H Taylor; M Adams; D M Tole; P Galloway; C Canning; J M Sparrow
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  The Cataract National Dataset electronic multi-centre audit of 55,567 operations: variation in posterior capsule rupture rates between surgeons.

Authors:  R L Johnston; H Taylor; R Smith; J M Sparrow
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  The Cataract National Dataset electronic multicentre audit of 55,567 operations: when should IOLMaster biometric measurements be rechecked?

Authors:  N E Knox Cartwright; R L Johnston; P D Jaycock; D M Tole; J M Sparrow
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Predictors of outcome in patients who underwent cataract surgery.

Authors:  O D Schein; E P Steinberg; S D Cassard; J M Tielsch; J C Javitt; A Sommer
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  The Cataract National Dataset electronic multicentre audit of 55,567 operations: antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications.

Authors:  J D Benzimra; R L Johnston; P Jaycock; P H Galloway; G Lambert; A K K Chung; T Eke; J M Sparrow
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.775

View more
  21 in total

1.  Predictive modeling of risk factors and complications of cataract surgery.

Authors:  Gregory L Gaskin; Suzann Pershing; Tyler S Cole; Nigam H Shah
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 2.597

2.  The Royal College of Ophthalmologists' Cataract Surgery Commissioning Guidance: executive summary.

Authors:  A C Day; R Wormald; S Coronini-Cronberg; R Smith
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Are rates of vision loss in patients in English glaucoma clinics slowing down over time? Trends from a decade of data.

Authors:  T Boodhna; L J Saunders; D P Crabb
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  The impact of outsourcing on cataract training in the UK.

Authors:  S Wijetilleka; C M Yeo; A Roberts; R Sengupta
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Trabeculectomy training in England: are we safe at training? Two year surgical outcomes.

Authors:  A Walkden; J Huxtable; M Senior; H Lee; S Naylor; S Turner; K Ivanova; J Koppens; B Todd; A Macleod; F Sii; N Anand; P Shah; A King; D C Broadway; J F Kirwan; A McNaught; A Bhan-Bhargava
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Confidence of ophthalmology specialist trainees in the management of posterior capsule rupture and vitreous loss.

Authors:  A M J Turnbull; S C Lash
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Association of Cataract Surgical Outcomes With Late Surgeon Career Stages: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Robert J Campbell; Sherif R El-Defrawy; Sudeep S Gill; Marlo Whitehead; Erica de L P Campbell; Philip L Hooper; Chaim M Bell; Martin W Ten Hove
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 7.389

8.  The Royal College of Ophthalmologists' National Ophthalmology Database Study of cataract surgery: report 2, relationships of axial length with ocular copathology, preoperative visual acuity, and posterior capsule rupture.

Authors:  A C Day; P H J Donachie; J M Sparrow; R L Johnston
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Final anatomic and visual outcomes appear independent of duration of silicone oil intraocular tamponade in complex retinal detachment surgery.

Authors:  Maedbh Rhatigan; Elizabeth McElnea; Patrick Murtagh; Kirk Stephenson; Elaine Harris; Paul Connell; David Keegan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 1.779

10.  Changing trends in postoperative cataract care: impact of electronic patient records in optometrist-delivered shared care.

Authors:  A M Mongan; F Kerins; B McKenna; S M Quinn; P Mullaney
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 1.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.