Literature DB >> 22440608

Bone healing using a bi-phasic ceramic bone substitute demonstrated in human vertebroplasty and with histology in a rabbit cancellous bone defect model.

H P Hatten1, M J Voor.   

Abstract

A non-exothermic material that demonstrates clinical pain relief comparable to polymethylacrylate (PMMA) for vertebroplasty and promotes bone healing is desirable. The purpose of this investigation is to demonstrate clinical pain score improvement and bone healing following vertebroplasty with a novel bi-phasic ceramic cement. Twenty patients were prospectively treated for compression fractures in a single center in the USA with the injectable bi-phasic ceramic bone substitute. Statistical comparison of pain scores was made during a 12 month follow-up retrospectively against a matched cohort of patients treated with PMMA vertebroplasty by the same neuroradiologist (HPH) in the same setting. The bone remodeling material was also evaluated with histology in a New Zealand white rabbit model. The bi-phasic material demonstrated a pre-operative mean VAS score of 8.5 (± 1.6) with a significant post-operative pain relief mean VAS score of 1.8 (± 2.5) after one week, which was maintained throughout the 12 month follow-up period. These data are in line with the pain scores for the PMMA treated cohort. CT scans six and 12 months after surgery with the bi-phasic cement showed healing of the osteoporotic fractures. In the rabbit model, histology with the study material showed evidence of incorporation, new bone growth and bone healing in a cancellous bone defect. Both the clinical results and the histologic evidence of bone healing and new bone growth support the application of this new bioinjectable material as an alternative to the use of PMMA for vertebroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22440608      PMCID: PMC3312082          DOI: 10.1177/159101991201800114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol        ISSN: 1591-0199            Impact factor:   1.610


  19 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures with percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty.

Authors:  N B Watts; S T Harris; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  New fractures after vertebroplasty: adjacent fractures occur significantly sooner.

Authors:  A T Trout; D F Kallmes; T J Kaufmann
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Properties of acrylic bone cement: state of the art review.

Authors:  G Lewis
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1997

4.  Intradiskal extravasation with low-volume cement filling in percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Mubin I Syed; Neel A Patel; Solomon Jan; Michael S Harron; Kamal Morar; Azim Shaikh
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Future directions. Augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral bodies.

Authors:  M P Bostrom; J M Lane
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Bioceramic vertebral augmentation with a calcium sulphate/hydroxyapatite composite (Cerament SpineSupport): in vertebral compression fractures due to osteoporosis.

Authors:  Michael Rauschmann; Thomas Vogl; Akhil Verheyden; Robert Pflugmacher; Thomas Werba; Sven Schmidt; Johannes Hierholzer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Risk factors of new compression fractures in adjacent vertebrae after percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  S H Kim; H S Kang; J A Choi; J M Ahn
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.990

8.  Biodegradation and biocompatability of a calcium sulphate-hydroxyapatite bone substitute.

Authors:  M Nilsson; J S Wang; L Wielanek; K E Tanner; L Lidgren
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-01

9.  Occurrence of new vertebral body fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Anita A Uppin; Joshua A Hirsch; Luis V Centenera; Bernard A Pfiefer; Artemis G Pazianos; In Sup Choi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  [Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty].

Authors:  P Galibert; H Deramond; P Rosat; D Le Gars
Journal:  Neurochirurgie       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.553

View more
  11 in total

1.  Longitudinal assessment of oxytocin efficacy on bone and bone marrow fat masses in a rabbit osteoporosis model through 3.0-T magnetic resonance spectroscopy and micro-CT.

Authors:  Y Qiu; J Yao; X Wu; B Zhou; H Shao; T Hua; Z Xiong; G Tang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Preparation and cytocompatibility of a novel bismuth aluminate/calcium phosphate cement with high radiopacity.

Authors:  Tingting Wu; Shue Yang; Haishan Shi; Jiandong Ye
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Use of a biphasic cement bone substitute in the management of metaphyseal fractures.

Authors:  Quan You Yeo; Ernest Beng Kee Kwek
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-08-10

4.  Augmentation of tibial plateau fractures with an injectable bone substitute: CERAMENT™. Three year follow-up from a prospective study.

Authors:  Riccardo Iundusi; Elena Gasbarra; Michele D'Arienzo; Andrea Piccioli; Umberto Tarantino
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 5.  Injectable bone cements: What benefits the combination of calcium phosphates and bioactive glasses could bring?

Authors:  Öznur Demir-Oğuz; Aldo R Boccaccini; Dagnija Loca
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-04-20

6.  Complete twelve month bone remodeling with a bi-phasic injectable bone substitute in benign bone tumors: a prospective pilot study.

Authors:  Jacek Kaczmarczyk; Piotr Sowinski; Maciej Goch; Katarzyna Katulska
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  The effect of a biphasic injectable bone substitute on the interface strength in a rabbit knee prosthesis model.

Authors:  Vasilis Zampelis; Magnus Tägil; Lars Lidgren; Hanna Isaksson; Isam Atroshi; Jian-Sheng Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Assessment of cellular viability on calcium sulphate/hydroxyapatite injectable scaffolds.

Authors:  Randa Alfotawi; Kurt Naudi; Matthew J Dalby; K Elizabeth Tanner; Jeremy D McMahon; Ashraf Ayoub
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 7.813

9.  Healing potentials of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement combined with platelet gel in the critical-sized radial bone defect of rats.

Authors:  Ahmad Oryan; Soodeh Alidadi; Amin Bigham-Sadegh; Ali Moshiri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Tissue reaction and material biodegradation of a calcium sulfate/apatite biphasic bone substitute in rat muscle.

Authors:  Jian-Sheng Wang; Magnus Tägil; Hanna Isaksson; Mathias Boström; Lars Lidgren
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.