Literature DB >> 22440553

Assessment of diurnal systemic dose of agrochemicals in regulatory toxicity testing--an integrated approach without additional animal use.

Shakil A Saghir1, Michael J Bartels, David L Rick, Alene T McCoy, Reza J Rasoulpour, Robert G Ellis-Hutchings, M Sue Marty, Claire Terry, Jason P Bailey, Richard Billington, James S Bus.   

Abstract

Integrated toxicokinetics (TK) data provide information on the rate, extent and duration of systemic exposure across doses, species, strains, gender, and life stages within a toxicology program. While routine for pharmaceuticals, TK assessments of non-pharmaceuticals are still relatively rare, and have never before been included in a full range of guideline studies for a new agrochemical. In order to better understand the relationship between diurnal systemic dose (AUC(24h)) and toxicity of agrochemicals, TK analyses in the study animals is now included in all short- (excluding acute), medium- and long-term guideline mammalian toxicity studies including reproduction/developmental tests. This paper describes a detailed procedure for the implementation of TK in short-, medium- and long-term regulatory toxicity studies, without the use of satellite animals, conducted on three agrochemicals (X11422208, 2,4-D and X574175). In these studies, kinetically-derived maximum doses (KMD) from short-term studies instead of, or along with, maximum tolerated doses (MTD) were used for the selection of the high dose in subsequent longer-term studies. In addition to leveraging TK data to guide dose level selection, the integrated program was also used to select the most appropriate method of oral administration (i.e., gavage versus dietary) of test materials for rat and rabbit developmental toxicity studies. The integrated TK data obtained across toxicity studies (without the use of additional/satellite animals) provided data critical to understanding differences in response across doses, species, strains, sexes, and life stages. Such data should also be useful in mode of action studies and to improve human risk assessments.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22440553     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  5 in total

1.  Predicting the future: opportunities and challenges for the chemical industry to apply 21st-century toxicity testing.

Authors:  Raja S Settivari; Nicholas Ball; Lynea Murphy; Reza Rasoulpour; Darrell R Boverhof; Edward W Carney
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Opportunities and challenges related to saturation of toxicokinetic processes: Implications for risk assessment.

Authors:  Yu-Mei Tan; Hugh A Barton; Alan Boobis; Rachel Brunner; Harvey Clewell; Rhian Cope; Jeffrey Dawson; Jeanne Domoradzki; Peter Egeghy; Pankaj Gulati; Brandall Ingle; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Kelly Lowe; Anna Lowit; Elizabeth Mendez; David Miller; Jeffrey Minucci; James Nguyen; Alicia Paini; Monique Perron; Katherine Phillips; Hua Qian; Tharacad Ramanarayanan; Fiona Sewell; Philip Villanueva; John Wambaugh; Michelle Embry
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  An F1-extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study in Crl:CD(SD) rats with 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid.

Authors:  Mary Sue Marty; Barbara H Neal; Carol L Zablotny; Barry L Yano; Amanda K Andrus; Michael R Woolhiser; Darrell R Boverhof; Shakil A Saghir; Adam W Perala; Julie K Passage; Marie A Lawson; James S Bus; James C Lamb; Larry Hammond
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Life-stage-, sex-, and dose-dependent dietary toxicokinetics and relationship to toxicity of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) in rats: implications for toxicity test dose selection, design, and interpretation.

Authors:  Shakil A Saghir; Mary S Marty; Carol L Zablotny; Julie K Passage; Adam W Perala; Barbara H Neal; Larry Hammond; James S Bus
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  A novel approach to calculating the kinetically derived maximum dose.

Authors:  Lyle D Burgoon; Claudio Fuentes; Christopher J Borgert
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 5.153

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.