Literature DB >> 22440275

Vascular endothelial growth factor Trap-Eye for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion: six-month results of the phase 3 COPERNICUS study.

David Boyer1, Jeffrey Heier, David M Brown, W Lloyd Clark, Robert Vitti, Alyson J Berliner, Georg Groetzbach, Oliver Zeitz, Rupert Sandbrink, Xiaoping Zhu, Karola Beckmann, Julia A Haller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of intravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) Trap-Eye in eyes with macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).
DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, prospective, controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred eighty-nine eyes with macular edema secondary to CRVO.
METHODS: Eyes were randomized 3:2 to receive VEGF Trap-Eye 2 mg or sham injection monthly for 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of eyes with a ≥15-letter gain or more in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at week 24 (primary efficacy end point), mean changes in BCVA and central retinal thickness (CRT), and proportion of eyes progressing to neovascularization of the anterior segment, optic disc, or elsewhere in the retina.
RESULTS: At week 24, 56.1% of VEGF Trap-Eye treated eyes gained 15 letters or more from baseline versus 12.3% of sham-treated eyes (P<0.001). The VEGF Trap-Eye treated eyes gained a mean of 17.3 letters versus sham-treated eyes, which lost 4.0 letters (P<0.001). Central retinal thickness decreased by 457.2 μm in eyes treated with VEGF Trap-Eye versus 144.8 μm in sham-treated eyes (P<0.001), and progression to any neovascularization occurred in 0 and 5 (6.8%) of eyes treated with VEGF Trap-Eye and sham-treated eyes, respectively (P = 0.006). Conjunctival hemorrhage, reduced visual acuity, and eye pain were the most common adverse events (AEs). Serious ocular AEs were reported by 3.5% of VEGF Trap-Eye patients and 13.5% of sham patients. Incidences of nonocular serious AEs generally were well balanced between both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: At 24 weeks, monthly intravitreal injection of VEGF Trap-Eye 2 mg in eyes with macular edema resulting from CRVO improved visual acuity and CRT, eliminated progression resulting from neovascularization, and was associated with a low rate of ocular AEs related to treatment.
Copyright © 2012 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22440275     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.01.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  71 in total

1.  Intravitreal aflibercept for macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion in patients with prior treatment with bevacizumab or ranibizumab.

Authors:  T D Papakostas; L Lim; T van Zyl; J B Miller; B S Modjtahedi; C M Andreoli; D Wu; L H Young; I K Kim; D G Vavvas; D D Esmaili; D Husain; D Eliott; L A Kim
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Predictive factors for functional improvement following intravitreal bevacizumab injections after central retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Kai Januschowski; Nicolas Feltgen; Amelie Pielen; Bernhard Spitzer; Matus Rehak; Georg Spital; Spyridon Dimopoulos; Carsten H Meyer; Gesine B Szurman
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Comparison of intravitreal ranibizumab and bevacizumab for the treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Alex Yuan; Baseer U Ahmad; David Xu; Rishi P Singh; Peter K Kaiser; Daniel F Martin; Jonathan E Sears; Andrew P Schachat; Justis P Ehlers
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Impact of treatment on long-term visual function in retinal vein occlusion-response to the comment on: retinal vein occlusion and the use of a dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®) in its treatment.

Authors:  Justus G Garweg; Souska Zandi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 5.  Aldosterone as a mediator of severity in retinal vascular disease: Evidence and potential mechanisms.

Authors:  Michael J Allingham; Priyatham S Mettu; Scott W Cousins
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 3.467

6.  Therapeutic potential of intravitreal pharmacotherapy in retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Marianne L Shahsuvaryan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Comparison between ranibizumab and aflibercept for macular edema associated with central retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Yoshitsugu Saishin; Yuka Ito; Masato Fujikawa; Tomoko Sawada; Masahito Ohji
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Potential anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies for central retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Marta S Figueroa; Inés Contreras
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  SCORE2 Report 1: Techniques to Optimize Recruitment in Phase III Clinical Trials of Patients With Central Retinal Vein Occlusion.

Authors:  Ingrid U Scott; Paul C VanVeldhuisen; Michael S Ip; Barbara A Blodi; Neal L Oden; Maria Figueroa
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 10.  Intravitreal aflibercept (Eylea(®)): a review of its use in patients with macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Lily P H Yang; Kate McKeage
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.