Literature DB >> 22439235

A biomechanical comparison of static versus dynamic lag screw modes for cephalomedullary nails used to fix unstable peritrochanteric fractures.

Paul R T Kuzyk1, Suraj Shah, Rad Zdero, Michael Olsen, James P Waddell, Emil H Schemitsch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The gamma nail has an option to statically lock its lag screw (static mode) or to allow its lag screw to move within the nail to compress the intertrochanteric fracture (dynamic mode). The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical stiffness of static and dynamic lag screw modes for a cephalomedullary nail used to fix an unstable peritrochanteric fracture.
METHODS: Unstable four-part peritrochanteric fractures were created in 30 synthetic femurs and fixed with Long Gamma 3 Nails. Mechanical tests were conducted for axial, lateral, and torsional stiffness with intact femurs, femur-nail constructs with static lag screw mode,and femur-nail constructs with dynamic lag screw mode. A paired Student's t test was used for all statistical comparisons between test groups.
RESULTS: Axial and torsional stiffness of intact femurs was significantly greater than femur-nail constructs (p < 0.01 all comparisons),whereas lateral stiffness was significantly less (p < 0.01 all comparisons). Axial stiffness of the femur-nail construct was significantly greater (p < 0.01) in static mode (484.3 N/mm 80.2 N/mm) than in dynamic mode (424.1 N/mm 78.0 N/mm).Lateral stiffness was significantly greater (p < 0.01) in static mode (113.9 N/mm 8.4 N/mm) than in dynamic mode (109.5N/mm 8.8 N/mm). Torsional stiffness was significantly greater (p = 0.02) in dynamic mode (114.5 N/mm 28.2 N/mm) than in static mode (111.7 N/mm 27.0 N/mm). DISCUSSION: There is a 60 N/mm (12.4%) reduction in axial stiffness when the lag screw is in dynamic mode. Given the statistically significant reduction in axial and lateral stiffness with use of the dynamic mode, static lag screw mode should be further explored clinically for treatment of unstable peritrochanteric fractures.
Copyright © 2012 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22439235     DOI: 10.1097/ta.0b013e3182170823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.313


  5 in total

1.  Locking in trochanteric fractures: a comparison of static versus dynamic locking using the Gamma3 nail.

Authors:  G W L Hulshof; M van der Stelt; H Schutte; P J van Koperen; T K Timmers; G D J van Olden; W P Kluijfhout
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-08-17

2.  Breakage of a Lag Screw of Cephalomedullary Nail: A Technique of Removal.

Authors:  Direk Tantigate; Kongkhet Riansuwan; Banchong Mahaisavariya; Kitichai Sukjaitham
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2015-05-18

3.  Biomechanical Consequences of Nail Insertion Point and Anterior Cortical Perforation for Antegrade Femoral Nailing.

Authors:  Michael Ching; Aaron Gee; Christopher Del Balso; Abdel Lawendy; Emil H Schemitsch; Radovan Zdero; David Sanders
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Outcomes of Wedge Wing in the Lag Screw for Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures in Elderly Patients.

Authors:  Jong Seok Baik; Keon Rok Kim; Byung Ha Park; Suc Hyun Kweon
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2021-06-04

5.  Biomechanical comparison of medial sustainable nail and proximal femoral nail antirotation in the treatment of an unstable intertrochanteric fracture.

Authors:  Shaobo Nie; Ming Li; Hui Ji; Zhirui Li; Wenwen Li; Hao Zhang; Zhang Licheng; Peifu Tang
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.410

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.