| Literature DB >> 22438698 |
Sengchanh Kounnavong1, Toshihiko Sunahara, Masahiro Hashizume, Junko Okumura, Kazuhiko Moji, Boungnong Boupha, Taro Yamamoto.
Abstract
Anemia is a severe public health problem in the Lao People's Democratic Republic (PDR). Consequently, a new control strategy to reduce the burden of anemia has been introduced for preschool children (aged 6-52 months). The objective of this study was to assess the current prevalence of anemia and related factors in preschool children in southern rural Lao PDR. A population-based cross-sectional study was carried out in six communities in Songkhone district, Savannakheth province, in February 2009. As a result, the prevalence of anemia was found to be 48.9% (95% confidence interval (CI), 43.5-54.3), although most cases were mild. A multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that there was no protective effect of breastfeeding against anemia. The anemia prevalence was higher in 1) children aged 6-23 months (Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.73, 95% CI, 1.02-2.90) than in older children, 2) children in large families (6 or more members) (OR = 1.96, 95% CI, 1.17-3.29), and 3) children in three remote villages with relatively difficult access to markets (OR = 3.01, 95% CI, 1.25-7.47).In Lao PDR, improvement of food practices and home-fortified food supplementation interventions are essential. High-risk groups should be targeted and a long-term health education program that aims to modify food habits implemented. Furthermore, in settings where iron deficiency is not the only cause of anemia, combining an iron supplement with other measures is necessary.Entities:
Keywords: Anemia; Lao PDR; potential factors; preschool children; prevalence
Year: 2011 PMID: 22438698 PMCID: PMC3289278 DOI: 10.2149/tmh.2011-13
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trop Med Health ISSN: 1348-8945
Fig. 1.Map of the study area. The thick and thin orange lines indicate paved and unpaved roads, respectively. The red circles indicate markets.
General characteristics of the children in the six study villages (n = 331)
| Characteristics | Muangkhai No. (%) | Kouthi No. (%) | Lahakhok No. (%) | Lahanam No. (%) | Thakhamlian No. (%) | Bengkhamlai No. (%) | Total No. (%) | Pª | |
| Sex | Girls | 22 (45.8) | 21 (48.8) | 33 (84.6) | 60 (57.1) | 29 (54.7) | 29 (67.4) | 194 (58.6) | 0.003 |
| Boys | 26 (54.2) | 22 (51.2) | 6 (15.4) | 45 (42.9) | 24 (45.3) | 14 (32.6) | 137 (41.4) | ||
| Age | 6–23 mo | 18 (37.5) | 15 (34.9) | 14 (35.9) | 33 (31.4) | 13 (24.5) | 21 (48.8) | 114 (34.4) | 0.227 |
| >23 mo | 30 (62.5) | 28 (85.1) | 25 (64.1) | 72 (68.6) | 40 (75.5) | 22 (51.2) | 217 (65.6) | ||
| Sociodemographic | |||||||||
| <6 years | 29 (60.4) | 38 (88.4) | 24 (61.5) | 48 (45.7) | 35 (66.0) | 40 (93.0) | 214 (64.7) | <0.001 | |
| >6 years | 19 (39.6) | 5 (11.6) | 15 (38.5) | 57 (54.3) | 18 (34.0) | 3 (7.0) | 117 (35.3) | ||
| Home | 1 (2.1) | 1 (2.3) | 3 (7.7) | 20 (19.0) | 8 (15.1) | 1 (2.3) | 34(10.3) | 0.002b | |
| Out | 47 (97.9) | 42 (97.7) | 36 (92.3) | 85 (81.0) | 45 (84.9) | 42 (97.7) | 297 (89.7) | ||
| 1–6 members | 24 (50.0) | 17 (39.5) | 26 (66.7) | 35 (33.3) | 26 (49.1) | 20 (46.5) | 158 (47.7) | 0.002 | |
| >6 members | 24 (50.0) | 26 (60.5) | 13 (33.3) | 70 (66.7) | 27 (50.9) | 23 (53.5) | 173 (52.3) | ||
| Low | 48 (100.0) | 37 (86.0) | 35 (89.7) | 41 (39.0) | 38 (70.7) | 28 (65.1) | 227 (68.6) | <0.001 | |
| High | 0 (0.0) | 6 (14.0) | 4 (10.3) | 64 (61.0) | 15 (28.3) | 15 (34.9) | 104 (31.4) | ||
| Feeding practices | |||||||||
| Never breastfed | 34 (70.8) | 34 (79.1) | 30 (76.9) | 81 (77.1) | 41 (77.4) | 25 (58.1) | 245 (74.0) | 0.188 | |
| Currently breastfed | 14 (29.2) | 9 (20.9) | 9 (23.1) | 24 (22.9) | 12 (22.6) | 18 (41.9) | 86 (26.0) | ||
| No | 39 (81.3) | 43 (100.0) | 39 (100.0) | 96 (91.4) | 53 (100.0) | 17 (39.5) | 287 (86.7) | <0.001 | |
| Yes | 9 (18.8) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 9 (8.6) | 0 (0.0) | 26 (60.5) | 44 (13.3) | ||
| Health status | |||||||||
| No | 12 (25.0) | 13 (30.2) | 8 (20.5) | 31 (29.5) | 17 (25.0) | 11 (25.6) | 92 (27.8) | 0.837 | |
| Yes | 36 (75.0) | 30 (69.8) | 31 (79.5) | 74 (70.5) | 36 (75.0) | 32 (74.4) | 239 (72.2) | ||
| No | 24 (50.0) | 24 (55.8) | 30 (76.9) | 69 (65.7) | 36 (67.9) | 31 (72.1) | 214 (64.7) | 0.078 | |
| Yes | 24 (50.0) | 19 (44.2) | 9 (23.1) | 36 (34.3) | 17 (32.1) | 12 (27.9) | 117 (35.3) | ||
| No | 46 (95.8) | 40 (93.1) | 37 (94.8) | 95 (90.4) | 47 (88.6) | 42 (97.6) | 307 (92.7) | 0.292b | |
| Yes | 2 (4.2) | 3 (6.9) | 2 (5.2) | 10 (9.6) | 6 (11.4) | 1 (2.3) | 24 (7.3) | ||
| No | 23 (48.9) | 30 (69.8) | 23 (58.9) | 58 (55.2) | 38 (71.7) | 26 (60.5) | 198 (59.8) | 0.124 | |
| Yes | 25 (52.1) | 13 (30.2) | 16 (41.0) | 47 (44.8) | 15 (28.3) | 17 (39.5) | 133 (40.2) | ||
| No | 29 (60.4) | 33 (76.7) | 27 (69.2) | 73 (69.5) | 44 (83.0) | 37 (86.0) | 243 (73.4) | 0.041 | |
| Yes | 19 (39.5) | 10 (23.3) | 12 (30.7) | 32 (30.4) | 9 (16.9) | 6 (13.9) | 88 (26.6) | ||
ª For comparison across villages (Pearson Chi-square test, df = 5)
b Villages were pooled into two groups (Muangkhai+ Kouthi + Lahakhok vs. Lahanam + Thakhamlian + Bengkhamlai) because of the small expected number for some table cells (df = 1)
Mean haemoglobin level (SD) and unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (and 95% CI) for the association between anemia and socioeconomic, health, and nutritional risk factors (n = 331)
| Characteristics | Hemoglobin concentration(g/L) [mean (SD)] | N (%) | Anemia Odds Ratio (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unadjusted | Adjusteda | ||||
| Sex | Girls | 108.8 (14.7) | 94 (48.5) | 0.95 (0.62, 1.47) | |
| Boys | 108.9 (14.0) | 68 (49.6) | 1.00 | ||
| Age | 6–23 mo | 105.2 (15.7) | 68 (59.7) | 1.92 (1.22, 3.13) | 1.90 (1.10, 3.30) |
| >24 mo | 110.8 (13.2) | 94 (43.3) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Village | Muangkhai | 107.0 (13.1) | 28 (58.3) | 2.61 (1.13, 6.23) | 3.01 (1.25, 7.47) |
| Kouthi | 104.0 (11.8) | 26 (60.5) | 2.85 (1.20, 6.99) | 3.64 (1.47, 9.36) | |
| Lahakhok | 107.5 (18.5) | 23 (59.0) | 2.68 (1.11, 6.70) | 3.94 (1.56, 10.39) | |
| Lahanam | 109.4 (12.6) | 50 (47.6) | 1.70 (0.82, 3.60) | 1.99 (0.93, 4.40) | |
| Thakhamlian | 111.6 (15.9) | 20 (37.7) | 1.13 (0.49, 2.64) | 1.42 (0.60, 3.45) | |
| Bengkhamlai | 112.5 (15.0) | 15 (34.9) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Education | <6 years | 109.0 (14.9) | 101 (47.2) | 0.82 (0.52, 1.28) | |
| >6 years | 108.7 (13.4) | 61 (52.1) | 1.00 | ||
| Working status | Out | 108.6 (14.5) | 147 (49.5) | 1.24 (0.61, 2.57) | |
| Home | 111.6 (12.7) | 15 (44.1) | 1.00 | ||
| SES* | Low | 108.6 (14.3) | 114 (50.2) | 1.05 (0.60, 1.85) | |
| High | 109.4 (14.6) | 48 (46.2) | 1.00 | ||
| Family size | >6 members | 108.0 (14.4) | 95 (54.9) | 1.97 (1.67, 3.33) | 1.96 (1.17, 3.29) |
| 1–6 members | 109.8 (13.7) | 67 (42.4) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Breastfed | Never breastfed | 110.1 (13.5) | 111 (45.3) | 0.57 (0.34, 0.93) | 0.70 (0.39, 1.25) |
| Currently breastfed | 105.4 (16.1) | 51 (59.3) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Afford baby food | No | 108.5 (14.3) | 144 (50.2) | 1.18 (0.51, 2.76) | |
| Yes | 111.4 (14.6) | 18 (40.9) | 1.00 | ||
| Deworming | No | 106.4 (15.6) | 51 (55.4) | 1.43 (0.88, 2.33) | |
| Yes | 109.8 (13.8) | 111 (46.4) | 1.00 | ||
| Diarrhea/Cough | Yes | 105.9 (14.4) | 64 (54.7) | 1.42 (0.86, 2.34) | 1.37 (0.84, 2.23) |
| No | 110.5 (14.5) | 98 (45.8) | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Wasting | No | 108.8 (14.5) | 151 (49.2) | 1.14 (0.5, 2.68) | |
| Yes | 109.8 (12.4) | 11 (45.8) | 1.00 | ||
| Stunting | No | 109.7 (14.9) | 93 (47.0) | 0.82 (0.53, 1.28) | |
| Yes | 107.6 (13.5) | 69 (51.9) | 1.00 | ||
| Underweight | No | 109.5 (14.9) | 114 (46.9) | 0.74 (0.45, 1.20) | |
| Yes | 107.1 (12.6) | 48 (54.6) | 1.00 | ||
ª Adjusted for covariates that have a P value less than 0.2 (age, family size, illness, breastfeeding status, and location) using multiple logistic regression