Literature DB >> 22438685

Fluoroscopically guided three-tube insertion for the treatment of postoperative gastroesophageal anastomotic leakage.

Guowen Yin1, Qingyu Xu, Shixi Chen, Xiangjun Bai, Feng Jiang, Qin Zhang, Lin Xu, Weidong Xu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of three-tube insertion for the treatment of postoperative gastroesophageal anastomotic leakage (GEAL).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2007 to January 2011, 28 cases of postoperative GEAL after an esophagectomy with intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomotic procedures for esophageal and cardiac carcinoma were treated by the insertion of three tubes under fluoroscopic guidance. The three tubes consisted of a drainage tube through the leak, a nasogastric decompression tube, and a nasojejunum feeding tube. The study population consisted of 28 patients (18 males, 10 females) ranging in their ages from 36 to 72 years (mean: 59 years). We evaluated the feasibility of three-tube insertion to facilitate leakage site closure, and the patients' nutritional benefit by checking their serum albumin levels between pre- and post-enteral feeding via the feeding tube.
RESULTS: The three tubes were successfully placed under fluoroscopic guidance in all twenty-eight patients (100%). The procedure times for the three tube insertion ranged from 30 to 70 minutes (mean time: 45 minutes). In 27 of 28 patients (96%), leakage site closure after three-tube insertion was achieved, while it was not attained in one patient who received stent implantation as a substitute. All patients showed good tolerance of the three-tube insertion in the nasal cavity. The mean time needed for leakage treatment was 21 ± 3.5 days. The serum albumin level change was significant, increasing from pre-enteral feeding (2.5 ± 0.40 g/dL) to post-enteral feeding (3.7 ± 0.51 g/dL) via the feeding tube (p < 0.001). The duration of follow-up ranged from 7 to 60 months (mean: 28 months).
CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this study, the insertion of three tubes under fluoroscopic guidance is safe, and also provides effective relief from postesophagectomy GEAL. Moreover, our findings suggest that three-tube insertion may be used as the primary procedure to treat postoperative GEAL.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophageal and cardiac carcinoma; GEAL; Interventional procedure; Three-tube insertion

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22438685      PMCID: PMC3303901          DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2012.13.2.182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Radiol        ISSN: 1229-6929            Impact factor:   3.500


  23 in total

1.  Diagnosis and conservative management of intrathoracic leakage after oesophagectomy.

Authors:  T C Dehn; K Menon
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Handsewn or stapled esophagogastric anastomoses after esophagectomy for cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  J D Urschel; C J Blewett; W F Bennett; J D Miller; J E Young
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.429

3.  A randomized trial of endoscopic and fluoroscopic placement of postpyloric feeding tubes in critically ill patients.

Authors:  James A Foote; Paul R Kemmeter; Pablo A Prichard; Randal S Baker; James D Paauw; Jeffery C Gawel; Alan T Davis
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Cancer of the esophagus: esophagogastric anastomotic leak--a retrospective study of predisposing factors.

Authors:  P K Patil; S G Patel; R C Mistry; R K Deshpande; P B Desai
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Enteral feeding tubes: placement by using fluoroscopy and endoscopy.

Authors:  D J Ott; H E Mattox; D W Gelfand; M Y Chen; W C Wu
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Use of the transgluteal route for percutaneous abscess drainage in acute diverticulitis to facilitate delayed surgical repair.

Authors:  J M Ryan; B L Murphy; G W Boland; P R Mueller
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review.

Authors:  J D Urschel
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements.

Authors:  M B Orringer; B Marshall; M D Iannettoni
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Critical appraisal of the significance of intrathoracic anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for cancer.

Authors:  B P Whooley; S Law; A Alexandrou; S C Murthy; J Wong
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  A new three-layer-funnel-shaped esophagogastric anastomosis for surgical treatment of esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Han-Lei Dan; Yang Bai; Hui Meng; Cong-Lin Song; Jie Zhang; Yong Zhang; Lei-Chi Wan; Ya-Li Zhang; Zhen-Shu Zhang; Dian-Yuan Zhou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  2 in total

1.  Choice of therapeutic strategies in intrathoracic anastomotic leak following esophagectomy.

Authors:  Juntang Guo; Xiangyang Chu; Yang Liu; Naikang Zhou; Yongfu Ma; Chaoyang Liang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 2.754

2.  Management of intrathoracic and cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Moniek H P Verstegen; Stefan A W Bouwense; Frans van Workum; Richard Ten Broek; Peter D Siersema; Maroeska Rovers; Camiel Rosman
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 5.469

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.