Literature DB >> 22438492

The benefit of being a social butterfly: communal roosting deters predation.

Susan D Finkbeiner1, Adriana D Briscoe, Robert D Reed.   

Abstract

Aposematic passion-vine butterflies from the genus Heliconius form communal roosts on a nightly basis. This behaviour has been hypothesized to be beneficial in terms of information sharing and/or anti-predator defence. To better understand the adaptive value of communal roosting, we tested these two hypotheses in field studies. The information-sharing hypothesis was addressed by examining following behaviour of butterflies departing from natural roosts. We found no evidence of roost mates following one another to resources, thus providing no support for this hypothesis. The anti-predator defence hypothesis was tested using avian-indiscriminable Heliconius erato models placed singly and in aggregations at field sites. A significantly higher number of predation attempts were observed on solitary models versus aggregations of models. This relationship between aggregation size and attack rate suggests that communally roosting butterflies enjoy the benefits of both overall decreased attack frequency as well as a prey dilution effect. Communal roosts probably deter predators through collective aposematism in which aggregations of conspicuous, unpalatable prey communicate a more effective repel signal to predators. On the basis of our results, we propose that predation by birds is a key selective pressure maintaining Heliconius communal roosting behaviour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22438492      PMCID: PMC3367783          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.0203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  17 in total

1.  The effects of predator learning, forgetting, and recognition errors on the evolution of warning coloration.

Authors:  M R Servedio
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Multiple, recurring origins of aposematism and diet specialization in poison frogs.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Santos; Luis A Coloma; David C Cannatella
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  UV photoreceptors and UV-yellow wing pigments in Heliconius butterflies allow a color signal to serve both mimicry and intraspecific communication.

Authors:  Seth M Bybee; Furong Yuan; Monica D Ramstetter; Jorge Llorente-Bousquets; Robert D Reed; Daniel Osorio; Adriana D Briscoe
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Environmental elements involved in communal roosting in Heliconius butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae).

Authors:  Christian Salcedo
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.377

5.  Enhancement of chromatic contrast increases predation risk for striped butterflies.

Authors:  Nina Stobbe; H Martin Schaefer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Postmating female odor in Heliconius butterflies: a male-contributed antiaphrodisiac?

Authors:  L E Gilbert
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-07-30       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Multiple benefits of gregariousness cover detectability costs in aposematic aggregations.

Authors:  M Riipi; R V Alatalo; L Lindström; J Mappes
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-10-04       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Positive selection of a duplicated UV-sensitive visual pigment coincides with wing pigment evolution in Heliconius butterflies.

Authors:  Adriana D Briscoe; Seth M Bybee; Gary D Bernard; Furong Yuan; Marilou P Sison-Mangus; Robert D Reed; Andrew D Warren; Jorge Llorente-Bousquets; Chuan-Chin Chiao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Gene expression underlying adaptive variation in Heliconius wing patterns: non-modular regulation of overlapping cinnabar and vermilion prepatterns.

Authors:  Robert D Reed; W Owen McMillan; Lisa M Nagy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  An antiaphrodisiac in Heliconius melpomene butterflies.

Authors:  Stefan Schulz; Catalina Estrada; Selma Yildizhan; Michael Boppré; Lawrence E Gilbert
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 2.626

View more
  21 in total

1.  How do predators generalize warning signals in simple and complex prey communities? Insights from a videogame.

Authors:  Mónica Arias; John W Davey; Simon Martin; Chris Jiggins; Nicola Nadeau; Mathieu Joron; Violaine Llaurens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  A field demonstration of the costs and benefits of group living to edible and defended prey.

Authors:  Edward A M Curley; Hannah E Rowley; Michael P Speed
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  The choosing of sleeping position in the overnight aggregation by the solitary bees Amegilla florea urens in Iriomote Island of Japan.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Yokoi; Naoto Idogawa; Ikuo Kandori; Aoi Nikkeshi; Mamoru Watanabe
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-03-07

4.  Maintaining mimicry diversity: optimal warning colour patterns differ among microhabitats in Amazonian clearwing butterflies.

Authors:  Keith R Willmott; Julia C Robinson Willmott; Marianne Elias; Chris D Jiggins
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Frequency dependence shapes the adaptive landscape of imperfect Batesian mimicry.

Authors:  Susan D Finkbeiner; Patricio A Salazar; Sofía Nogales; Cassidi E Rush; Adriana D Briscoe; Ryan I Hill; Marcus R Kronforst; Keith R Willmott; Sean P Mullen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Behavioural Contagion Explains Group Cohesion in a Social Crustacean.

Authors:  Pierre Broly; Jean-Louis Deneubourg
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Vertical heterogeneity in predation pressure in a temperate forest canopy.

Authors:  Kathleen R Aikens; Laura L Timms; Christopher M Buddle
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Inferring predator behavior from attack rates on prey-replicas that differ in conspicuousness.

Authors:  Yoel E Stuart; Nathan Dappen; Neil Losin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Body size but not warning signal luminance influences predation risk in recently metamorphosed poison frogs.

Authors:  Eric E Flores; Martin Stevens; Allen J Moore; Hannah M Rowland; Jonathan D Blount
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Ambient temperature influences birds' decisions to eat toxic prey.

Authors:  M Chatelain; C G Halpin; C Rowe
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.844

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.